Bounty and too many participants

[Coinlovertoo]

Well that is usually happen when the platforms.of an ico's are very presentable
Because they are very obsess on what would be gained rewards after the campaign .
That is the postscript of all peope here.

[1714010427]

1714010427

[1714010427]

1714010427

[Ricsung]

Yes, there are many bounty hunters involved in every project. I am a bit uncomfortable with some activities that postpone the ICO plan without restricting the number of people. But there's no way. I've been sticking to it for a long time.

[W2014]

With many new participants, we got many new newbies with low skills and they do very bad marketing, why we need to support them?

[Scor1937]

Companies r interested when there are a lot of participants. They aren`t very interested in how much we earn. They need to do a lot of advertising for some budget. The more advertising (participants), the more information about the project

[Q2kc]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

you cannot stop people joining bounty campaign because they can gain money from it, so some bounty manager like sylon and others limit the participants, but if you want to gain more on bounty, my suggestion to you join the signature or article writing, because these campaigns only have few participants, Goodluck!

[SnapFX]

Really, the last six months, we big inflow of persons interested to participate in bounty - campaigns observes. The competition grows, among ICO projects more and more deception appears.
I think that in the future many bounty-managers will enter KYC for the projects and it will allow to eliminate robots.

[MainIbem]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

There are regulations to the participation of all bounties. Most managers require you to have a minimum followership before you join the bounty. Others regulate the rank level for you to join the campaign. Still, others have a cap to the numbers of participants. However, as the day goes by, more and more persons are coming to know bitcointalk and bounty programs as a way of earning extra income. Therefore the number of persons joining will definitely increase as time goes on.

[clvchb]

The bounty is becoming more and more popular, and the number of encrypted digital bounty hunters is growing every day. As a result, some managers limit the number of participants in their companies. I think this is the right decision and fully support it.

[Qungis]

My opinion is that everyone needs money and everyone is trying to make money where he is able to earn them.

[Nikitavoz]

We`ll not see less participants with u, the more this direction develops, the more participants will be in any business, and the crypto will not be an exception. But all this will only facilitate the involvement of new people in crypto, and this is very good news, at least for me. Success in this direction depends only on the number of people.

[heidikarenina]

Yes, bounty campaign is getting more and more popular, and there are many new participants also, but it doesn't mean with more participants we earn less rewards for bounty campaign. In fact, there are many bounty campaigns which they didn't limit their participants.

[krishnaverma]

Really, the last six months, we big inflow of persons interested to participate in bounty - campaigns observes. The competition grows, among ICO projects more and more deception appears.
I think that in the future many bounty-managers will enter KYC for the projects and it will allow to eliminate robots.

KYC is not a good idea and even the adding has spoken against it. Even the crypto is essentially against this idea. This can be even dangerous for some members here to reveal their real identity as they are dealing with huge money or transactions on this forum itself under an anonymous name.

[prdn]

There are a lot of Bounty Hunters and ico's don't keep their promises, and the bounty are no longer low and no deliveries.

[pat231]

The popularity of bounty all over the world has made marks in people's lives. Glad to know that despite others suspicion, still many people choose to join bounties for they know what it can bring to their lives and to others. It looks like you are worried about your personal profit in the bounty campaign. For the investor and the campaign itself, a large number of participants is the success of the project

[alexey8080]

Bounty campaigns are getting harder these days. As you said many participants.
But there are more ICO nowadays too, so you can choose from.

[EmJay]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

 There are so many participants because like you , everyone else wants to earn too. Maybe bounty campaigns should limit only the bounty participants they will be accepting but  the more parricipants the more it helps promoting the project in which it can attract more investors. Other than that I don't know what regulations should be implemented. Everyone deserves to join as long as you are not cheating.

[Zach707]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

This would be the decision of the bounty manager if he want to limit the participants in his bounty campaign. On the ICO's point of view, they want more people to participate in their campaign so that many people will know of their project.

[SabrinaBianka]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

You have point, So amazix team adjust their rules and add the following rule. Some people didn't follow their rules so its disqualified. I think that's better, Because if all people was bounty hunter. There is no investor that can invest on ICO, Its better to include a limit for each campaign. better is 1500 People for Facebook campaign same on Twitter, 1000 People for signature campaign. This is needed because for me the rewards is fix and participants and stakes is not.

[Walter789]

I think there's no wrong for havimg too many participants in bounty campaign particularly in social media campaign. This things happened when merit system implemented because there are members that stock on their current rank so all them think it is more difficult to earn bounty tokens through signature campaign. So instead of participating jn signature campaign they grab the opportunity to earn profits by participating in social media campaign.

As long they have more friends and followers in their social media account they could possibly earn more. We know that in social media campaign there's no need any ranking system in social media campaign.

There's no wrong in participating social media campaign, the important is they do their job well and they don't break any rules and regulations.



Thank you.

[Crypto_Wanderer]

More people - less profit in one hand and more different Bounties in another. It's better to take part in those which are more limited campaigns. Here is a kind of regulation, not so many participants in translation and moderation, media.