Bounty and too many participants

[Sithara007]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Regulations are needed on the bounty participants, as well as on the ICOs. I agree that the quality of the participants have dropped over the past few months. But the same is true for the ICOs as well. A lot many of the bounty campaigns are not paying its participants. After 2-3 months of time and effort, we get a message like this: "The ICO has failed and therefore we have decided not to distribute the bounty". Seriously? WTF?

[1713579637]

1713579637

[1713579637]

1713579637

[1713579637]

1713579637

[1713579637]

1713579637

[1713579637]

1713579637

[Lordshiva]

yeah you are correct the number of bounty participants is growing day by day . that will decrease the reward also. most of the time it happens to famous bounties. but now some bounty managers limit the participant amount so that will rectify this problem.

Yes that is the only solution of that problem is bounty managers should limit the number of participants..specially in social media campaigns..otherwise in some days bounties will become just like the faucets were used to... Because of low rewards i have stopped to participate in social media campaigns anymore

[Vaniaevergarden]

Bounties evolve. Now we see an increased number of both ICO and participants of the bounties. The time will come, it will all go to the quality. All that we can do now is to act properly, thus not being subjected to natural selection.

[Lamborgini]

I agree with you. Lots of Bounty Program followers participate. Perhaps this is the effect of the development of Cryptocurrency and ICO causing many people who want to join the Bounty program to get a chance to win a token prize.
I also agree if there are some grant campaign rules to be more strict in the rules and they will only choose the best participants.

[summerbray]

Yes indeed it is good for getting profit but it is not that easy to get bigger profit now because theyre is a lot of participant and it is normal for it which its good because it has a lot of potential to success

[LyaBog]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I agree completely.  That it is necessary to toughen rules of participation in bounty companies.  Because it began to appear a lot of non-literate managers - who do not work honestly.  But just because of the negligence of the leaders of the bounty of companies and accrue tokens.  And good qualified managers get paid a penny.  I have already read a similar branch, where a man cited many facts of dishonest managers.

[Mikospark]

People want to earn money, so I think there is not much can be done to control the increase of bounty participants. Because the desire for money is one of the strongest motivations. I think that you can choose a good bounty manager with good ICO,  who has strict rules and also choose bounty campaigns that limit the number of participants.

[godspree]

It is a problem that's becoming more and more urgent nowadays. The number of bounty participants is increasing enormously and it leads to the fact that after working for a couple of months you get 30-40 dollars for the whole campaigne. It irritates a little bit because your efforts don't bring a satisfying result.  It seems to me that it can be solved if managers would limit the number of participants in bounty campaignes.

[Thirio]

That's a tough one; it's definitely an early adoption model for profit, but what sort of regulations can be put in place? How would you define the "Best" participants? Likely any system would only make it suitable for long-term participants/members of some group and only serve to discourage anyone who is just entering the community.

Possible solution would be limiting the participants. Some bounties even have 3k+ members on their spreadsheet, not that i'm against it, and it's probably good for the project too, considering more participants would endorse the project. But on the other hand, most of these people are just using alt accounts. Yep, this is a tough one.

[daglordjames]

yes, there are too many participants in bounty campaigns because its easy and popular but i saw some bounty campaigns that has few participants.

[Schwifty27]

i think its because its popular and most of people here is doing it and maybe its easy to do by doing their tasks.

[sorehammer]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

You are right there should some hard rules for bounty participants and bounty managers should should strictly get them followed by participants.Bounty Managers should analyze accounts of every participants and should include those whose are making constructive posts and having high merits and should start from high ranks.In this way reward will be high and bounty potential participants would work hard to make their accounts constructive.

[tolobua]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Maybe you can start a campaign on LineApp, there you do not seem to get a competitor

[SGToken]

If there are many participants of the bounty , there will be many bounty for participants to join too.
That's mean it's totally fair and nothing weird or unfair is happening  at all.
People want to have a job and bounty is a place where people getting jobs and that's all , very simple

[97percent]

It's a sign of increasingly famous bounty and crypto users are also increasing. I would not be too concerned with the allocation. For me the growing positive market is more important and I should focus on what I have done before.

[lam06061999]

I think the bounty campaign options a lot, so we need not be afraid to not get a share. We are free to choose the bounty we want. Do not be a little annoyed because bounty participants a lot of it signifies that bounty is good.

[leow]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Agree with you! This is a big problem for the participants of the bounty, because now count on a good profit is not necessary. It remains to be hoped that the managers of bounty companies in the future will impose restrictions on the number of participants. Although some sites have long practiced such restrictions.

[trisdivergent1201]

I hope that companies will carefully select the participants to recruit them less and pay them more. Because try to hire so many of them and not everybody do their work properly

[Zigzagkuy]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Sometimes social media campaigns are created by some rules, but they can not reduce the number of participants. It's not anyone's fault. Maybe there should be standardization to follow bounty campaigns like ranking rules in this forum. That's just my opinion.

[hh4mmm]

yes that is true, now in normal senses don't you think that is why we get limited to the upgrade in rank so that they can be able to settle every that participated in a particular project, moreover since they now that in time phase their will be more participants. but they population now is much even us to as normal is problem, i can't even earn up to 1% of what i do earn before is problems. i don't what to do about the sudden increment.