Bounty and too many participants

[akadiimamontov]

I completely agree with you. Strict rules must be established. But that's just how much it benefits the customer, it's a question.

[1713884606]

1713884606

[1713884606]

1713884606

[1713884606]

1713884606

[1713884606]

1713884606

[1713884606]

1713884606

[1713884606]

1713884606

[imperatorbounty7]

     What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.

[dxgam]

in my opinion, with the large number of new participants joining the bounty campaign, it will get little results. at least the managers who run bounty campaigns more restrict participants who join bounty campaigns and apply strict rules.

[amaterazu]

Its a good sign that crypto currency are getting popular and peoples start to try to get crypto currency into their hands. But our rewards are getting small and I hope that it will be more fair in the future.

[dxgam]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I agree with you that if more and more new participants join the bounty campaign, the less revenue we earn, the managers managing the bounty campaign need to limit the participants joining the bounty campaign, and enforce strict rules so that no multi-account on a bounty campaign.

[honestinvestor]

This was to be expected - so to speak, the laws of supply and demand - the bounty of people more and more and generosity is not the same. ico - for various fraudulent organizational projects it is the most.(

[thinhthai]

So, you also can choose campaign with little person joined or have a limited. I don't hesitate to share with you BPS right now. Take consideration!!! 

[stoxalpha]

First, participating in a bounty requires a lot of time and effort. Not everyone is willing to do this. And there are not many coins issued by the bounty mission. If there are more participants, all participants will receive fewer coins. For publishers, the more people are involved, the more happy they are. Their purpose is to let more people know their coins. For ICO participants, the more people involved in the bounty mission, the more valuable ICO's investment is.

[vakeswork]

not the usual thing anyway because it is now the participants are also increasing. luckily there is a merit system that makes inhibition increase rank to anticipate the number of spammers here

Merit system affects only on a signature campaign. Now I'm thinking that social networks campaign don't worth the time, because of no participants limits in the majority. Only campaigns with a limit will give a profit. Less participants in reddit and translation campaigns.

Totally agree with you. Only campaigns with limits give a good profit

[mulia sabee]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I see positive only.
I think with the number of participants to join in the bounty, like twitter danFacebook it means that participants in this forum is growing and increasingly preferred by various communities. about big and small income that is in accordance with what we are doing in this forum.

[griga85]

rewards bounty companies will soon change their appearance. At the moment, some companies have begun to enter the maximum number of participants. I think that after a while, accounts with the rank of Jr.Member will not be able to participate, and people with the account above will understand that the reward is very low and will give up this job

[mprepkiah]

the number of participants who support a bounty will facilitate in promoting it and can smooth the success when ico, join the signature will get more results than on joining bounty facebook and twitter

[Bitcoinidaman]

An alternative route would be for bounty managers to scale the rewards based on the amount of participation, so if there's a lot of participants in one ICO, then give bonus stakes, because I'm pretty sure it's not costing them a damn thing to distribute their own coins in exchange for advertising.

[rdzepc]

This is because there is no commercialized bounty forum. BTT is not a special bounty forum, but many ICOs have come to this forum to promote their products because of the number of BTT cryptocurrency players.

[Exforgant]

In my opinion, bounty managers should held the process of regulating of participation in bounty campaignes in a more stict way. There are should be a limited amount of participants in bounty campaignes, so when you finish working, you will get a proper amount of stakes. There are a lot of bounty campaignes, enough for everyone. But they must be better regulated.

[fathur01]

I think you need to tighten the rules in relation to the participants of the bounty. It is also necessary to reduce the number of participants who can take part in the bounty companies.

[poutgkj56]

I don't think it's a problem. It still depends on the bounty program, because there are limits their participants, while others allow so many participants may be because they want to get the Twitter and Facebook followers and spread their project. There are also many participants that mean many people like your project because they join.

[londawzen]

Agreed. We need to impose restrictions to payments were not so small. Now a thriving multi-accounting 

[chits]

This is a positive moment for the organizers of ICO, because than more participants then better  effect can be achieved. I think that in such a situation for the ICO it does not make sense to limit the number of participants if so many people are ready to attend. It is Bounty Hunters should think before joining the Bounty campaigns where there are 1000 or more participants.

[4ernuy]

I do not think that this is a big problem, many of the participants are eliminated during the campaign, and  they will receive fewer staks.