Bounty and too many participants

[DonateBB]

Bounty is still worth it. It's depends of the type of the bounty you join. If you only just join social media bounty you maybe only get a little but if you have skills in translation you may get a lot more

Now, there are too many people involved in the bonus campaign, I think in the future Bounty campaigns will be widely spread and many people know them, so the number of participants is quite large so we will Get fewer tokens at the end of the campaign. And once people arrive, there are people who offer scams, which in turn will wipe out other bounty hunters.

[1714000208]

1714000208

[1714000208]

1714000208

[JTEN18]

It is not surprising at all. In fact the community is important for the campaign. But when it is all about reward, yes, it is true that more participants less reward. For me it would be better if bounty participation is limited according to budget.

[stripykitteh]

so now there are a lot of bounty participants and their number is growing every day, and payments are getting smaller and smaller (

I find that the opposite is happening with that. If the participant list is growing then it would mean that the people would have to do more work to get the money. More money would be pouring into this crypto thing.

[zarintasnim]

Yes i am agree with you that now days so many participant on bounty program especially Facebook and Twitter. Complete a bounty after one or two month get very few reward.It time to come bounty rules update and only take who have quality.

[Peple]

You can find a campaign where conditions will be more difficult and fewer people, the total number of people on the forum will still increase

[xTachibana]

Yes, in my opinion this is quite a serious problem, because smaller projects can not compete with large ones, because all participants tend to get into projects with the largest bounty payment!

[atutay]

In my opinion, the best that campaign managers ca do about that is to limit the number of participants on each campaign and set a specific schedule of when the registration will close.

[travwill]

I prefer companies with limits, they are few, but this is better than companies with a huge number of participants. Especially a lot of people in the companies of popular managers.

[Kita Kita]

I prefer companies with limits, they are few, but this is better than companies with a huge number of participants. Especially a lot of people in the companies of popular managers.

For me when the bounty has too many participants, the rewards we can get will became very low so my advice is always find a bounty campaign that has not a lot of participants but have a great project and great team.

[lunastovski]

I advise you to participate in the bounty where few participants.  This is the best choice.

[trantrangg999]

First of all you speak like bounty should be monopolized, it should not. Why should you, me, or whoever for that matter have more right to join bounty campaigns than the rest. I have to say I do not like your tone of voice it sounds very selfish .

[Andrej Peiboski]

There are not "too many". The system will self regulate, as any other system.

[Acapri]

If you think there are too many participants in bounty campaign, most especially for those who are yet to come into it. They are missing a lot of opportunities. No matter how much the number of participants are, if you do your tasks so well, you will still get good rewards.

[sergikrnd]

the number of participants is really growing very fast. But the investor will not leave. I myself am involved in some projects in the bounty and invested in icontext.

[icopir]

When too many people participate in bounty campaigns, it always beats by the number of awards received

[hegewrw]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I advise you to look for a bounty, where there is a limit on the number of participants.  Or look for a bounty where there are few participants.

[huongthuy195t]

But there are more ICO nowadays so its okay if there are more participants, they have right to earn more from ICO. Its better because when they have money from ICO, they will invest in ICO. So this industry will be huge.

[sonofliberty]

I would like to have all the bounties having a cap of participants, byu doing that we will get more payments with less work done

[Dmitry_K]

This is a normal situation when the pure participants are growing and at the same time the profit is unfortunately reduced. We need to choose campaigns for participation more carefully.

[Chaki]

Bounty hive and bountyOx is welcoming you to join their ICO project if your looking for campaign with limited number of participant so the award is prior calculated.