Bounty and too many participants

[CKdexter]

that's because the increase popularity of cryptocurrencyes during last year atract many newbies to the crypro world. majority of them dont have enough capital to invest in projects. so they used to do bounty and earn some free stuff to build a capital

[1713877285]

1713877285

[bnsdywoahg]

This is a normal situation when the pure participants are growing and at the same time the profit is unfortunately reduced. We need to choose campaigns for participation more carefully.

[corat coret]

do strict rules need to be enforced before participating in a bounty campaign ?, I guess that only makes the number of participants very few, and instead makes the bounty campaign eventually become a scam

[ice098]

It is necessary to find very good companies with very few people.There are such companies and their payments are much higher

For me having many participants in a bounty is not good because more participants less reward to get, that's why it's better to join in bounty that has less participants because you can get more reward. But since bounty is become popular, many people right now is participating to it, and its not easy to find bounty that has less participants, so i think keep joining in bounty even it has lfew or many people participate to it because it still worth it.

[Sithara007]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I have also noticed the rise in the participants, especially with the social media bounty. A lot of new members are joining, and at the same time the quality of the work is going down. Unfortunately, many of the bounty managers care more about quantity rather than quality.

[Totoky]

I think peoples has right and deserved a chance to participate in bounty even they are newbie. Hope there will be more good bounties with bigger rewards, because Twitter campaigns now are totally useless, lot of work with personal tweets, reports and so on... Also blogs are bad, there are many copy/paste articles..

[Cryptokeke]

Ofcourse its it got too many participants because bounty campaign now is very famous, because it gives free altcoins in just advertising the ICO so many people will join bounty campaigns. You can earn altcoins for free and can get money out from it.

[Captainluffy24]

I definitely agree on this! There are times that you will no longer earn something because of this issue.  Managers needs to regulate number of participants just like how sylon do his thing.

[icowind]

The requirements of the current bounty activities have become increasingly stringent, and as more and more people participate in the bounty activities, the benefits we can obtain from them are gradually decreasing. I think this is a very normal phenomenon.

[soothinggel]

The problem is, people think a proper ICO should run a bounty campaign, and so they should make one whether it is really what they need or not.

[itrade777]

Many new bounty hunters join every single day in the bounty campaign because it is easy and it is free. The one who join here early have huge advantage compare to us because right now it is very hard to earn MERITS cause of the new policy. So the one who will earn less still is the new comers.

[verziagra]

yes it is very good if the rule is applied in every bounty in this forum. many participants are breaking the rules and making harmful work. it is better to choose the participants who are considered good and pay more participants who work well.

[pandanaran]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It is one of the things that happen because the popularity of bounty and cryptocurrency, the ICOs just want to advertise their project to publict and the little earnings for bounty this is not something they have to deal with, they only give tokens to bounty participants according to their rules, only just to face this we also have to change.

[Suharjo]

yes it is true today crypto society is more interested in bounty campaign than to invest in crypto project. this is because the number of ICOs that are less successful or even just contain fraud. so many investors are currently avoiding ICO. but in the camp a bounty of gift-sharing is based on the level of the level so it will be difficult for new people to make a profit.

[qiman]

I am not sure now what is happening in the bounty section anymore. I have also made many videos but these last two months I am barely getting anything anymore. I keep checking the dates for some bounties that have ended and they are not paying out. I think soon many people will start leaving the bounties. I will continue making videos for now but am currently looking for a full time job as a Teacher now as I do not think we can survive from bounties in a western country anymore. I think mainly those in developing countries will continue mainly with bounties full time as they have cheaper living costs.

[Geoll29]

I think the owners are already strict when choosing the best participants. And they show this by not giving rewards to those are not doing their chores. A stricter policy is not also good because the weak ones won't be able to earn just like the others.

[fathur01]

I think we should introduce a limit on the number of participants in the bounty of the company. Personally, what infuriates me is the fact that people want so badly to participate in the bounty of the companies that do it with multiple accounts, well, and similar phenomena. I think that we need some rules to resolve this issue.

[skylar]

IMHO it is good thing for the project itself when some project have too many participant on it. the good side is just because so many people will spread the word about the project into any media, it could help to rise up the token price too after that. the bad side is the reward for the bounty hunter will become tiny. I agree to limit participant only in BTCtalk signature campaign but not for social media campaign.

[benedictonathan]

It is necessary to find very good companies with very few people.There are such companies and their payments are much higher

For me having many participants in a bounty is not good because more participants less reward to get, that's why it's better to join in bounty that has less participants because you can get more reward. But since bounty is become popular, many people right now is participating to it, and its not easy to find bounty that has less participants, so i think keep joining in bounty even it has lfew or many people participate to it because it still worth it.

Most of what I have encountered so far has limited number of twitter and facebook participants, some choose to pay only like 2000 participants for each platform. Then the problem lies with the payment. Facebook and twitter has some of the lowest value payments in a bounty participation and that is only basing on experience. Blocklancer for example lets participants "work" for them for like 6 months or five, only to be paid less than 150 tokens at the end of the campaign then the value of that their work is like only a few dollars. We need to find ways to prevent from being DUPED by these kinds of greedy companies letting us work only to get a few dollars after a few months.

[fzatni]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think more and more that come is fair because this global forum do not blame people who just came, this is a positive trend for crypto because the more in the know a lot of society and liquidity increases maybe this new beginning ICO raises a little reward for the bounty