Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 10:59:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: merged mining vs side-chains (another kind of merged mining)  (Read 6903 times)
Peter Todd
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1150


View Profile
October 21, 2013, 10:39:11 AM
 #21

killerstorm: https://github.com/petertodd/decentralized-consensus-systems.git <- github repo for that paper; I just added a bunch of todo notes on what needs writing.

If you want to be a moderator, report many posts with accuracy. You will be noticed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715165959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715165959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715165959
Reply with quote  #2

1715165959
Report to moderator
1715165959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715165959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715165959
Reply with quote  #2

1715165959
Report to moderator
1715165959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715165959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715165959
Reply with quote  #2

1715165959
Report to moderator
bitcool
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1441
Merit: 1000

Live and enjoy experiments


View Profile
October 21, 2013, 12:05:57 PM
 #22

Quote
We start with an assumption that there exist a financial market which allows one to profit when a price of a certain currency drops.

Recall that short selling is tightly regulated, for that exact reason. If such a market did exist, it'd probably be a black market (for now, at any rate). Anyway, you could apply the same argument to Bitcoin itself. The network is not that hard to DoS, so, perhaps everyone should just give up Wink

It's easy to over think things. When Bitcoin was new a lot of very smart people I talked to about it came up with very reasonable and convincing arguments about why it couldn't work. All those people were wrong. By all means think things through, but be careful of falling into the trap of being too clever!
Don't CampBX and Mpex support short selling already?

OTOH, short selling requires credit, thus trust, something hard to come by in black markets.
Peter Todd
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1150


View Profile
October 21, 2013, 12:25:06 PM
 #23

Don't CampBX and Mpex support short selling already?

OTOH, short selling requires credit, thus trust, something hard to come by in black markets.

You could also effectively short a merge-mined system - in a trust-free decentralized manner - by using oracle betting like the system alp is working on.

"I bet Namecoin will have a hash rate of X on date Y"

petersiddle98
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 272
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 21, 2013, 12:36:44 PM
 #24

Is it more profitable using merged mining?

Mike Hearn
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1129


View Profile
October 21, 2013, 01:47:33 PM
 #25

Don't CampBX and Mpex support short selling already?

I don't know, but MPex at least is almost certainly illegal.
bluemeanie1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 257


bluemeanie


View Profile WWW
October 22, 2013, 01:23:51 AM
 #26

If you havent already taken a look at the Confidence Chains proposal, I suggest you do.  It solves most of these issues in a very simple way.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwUFHE6KYsM0ZkxLVmFwbXQ3ck0/preview?pli=1

Just who IS bluemeanie?    On NXTautoDAC and a Million Stolen NXT

feel like your voice isn't being heard? PM me.   |   stole 1M NXT?
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!