|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
batishta
|
 |
March 16, 2018, 01:43:25 PM |
|
Very interesting arrangement of projects in the rating. My personal rating would be different. Watching not the rating you want to learn some coins
|
|
|
|
|
Lora Davis
Member
 Offline
Activity: 742
Merit: 80
|
|
March 16, 2018, 01:44:02 PM |
|
Thank you, useful!
So many projects in one place! Excellent!
|
|
|
|
|
vejdemann
Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 75
|
|
March 16, 2018, 02:23:56 PM |
|
Yes, it's can be usefull, thank you for this find! I will study this in more detail when I will have free time.
So if you can, please update your topic periodically.
|
|
|
|
|
oleg2228118
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 1
|
|
March 16, 2018, 02:25:12 PM |
|
Very interesting and necessary! Thanks for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shivansps
|
|
March 16, 2018, 02:32:06 PM |
|
That's very interesting and useful rating. Github means active developers. I prefer active development rather than only marketing and talking about how good their project is. Will definitely add this thread to my top.
|
|
|
|
|
iBenGunArmor (OP)
|
|
March 16, 2018, 05:00:53 PM |
|
That's very interesting and useful rating. Github means active developers. I prefer active development rather than only marketing and talking about how good their project is. Will definitely add this thread to my top.
Thank you very much, indeed, the activity of developers makes it clear how the project is supported and developed by the team, and this is an important point in our technological sphere. I note for myself a few points, this is the liquidity of the product and its prospect. And without constant attention to the development, few people have a chance of success. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seneka
|
|
March 17, 2018, 10:35:13 AM |
|
Great work, now will be where to see the activity of projects after their release. I noticed that they are doing monthly updates, will the updates - we'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
vetrovppp
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 107
The All-in-One Cryptocurrency Exchange
|
|
March 17, 2018, 11:29:06 AM |
|
Great work, now will be where to see the activity of projects after their release. I noticed that they are doing monthly updates, will the updates - we'll see.
so really very useful information, it is interesting whether there will be an update. I would certainly change this rating a bit, but I like it in this way too. Let them continue to work on the rating, this is a promising project. |
|
|
|
|
iBenGunArmor (OP)
|
|
March 17, 2018, 11:32:47 AM |
|
Great work, now will be where to see the activity of projects after their release. I noticed that they are doing monthly updates, will the updates - we'll see.
so really very useful information, it is interesting whether there will be an update. I would certainly change this rating a bit, but I like it in this way too. Let them continue to work on the rating, this is a promising project. If you have something to say, please, it will be helpful for the community to know everyone's opinion. What would you change in the ranking? |
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador
|
|
March 17, 2018, 11:38:05 AM |
|
this is what it takes a programmer like me to know the value of a project, thank you for sharing it here. |
|
|
|
|
|
shivansps
|
|
March 17, 2018, 05:48:09 PM |
|
We can create community and share the thoughts about projects github development and add them to the list. Great idea! Let's focus on development and coding  |
|
|
|
|
iBenGunArmor (OP)
|
|
March 17, 2018, 07:34:12 PM |
|
We can create community and share the thoughts about projects github development and add them to the list. Great idea! Let's focus on development and coding I think this topic will grow, and replenished with information from public and private sources - stay in touch and will collect rating notes of different well-known authors. |
|
|
|
|
|
oldminer78
|
|
March 18, 2018, 03:17:14 PM |
|
We can create community and share the thoughts about projects github development and add them to the list. Great idea! Let's focus on development and coding Yes, let's make a topic with a rating of blockchain projects. I mean, right now it's going to be relevant, though not exactly - but relevant. He noticed that the more active a project is in development the better it is for investment. |
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
March 18, 2018, 03:38:30 PM |
|
this is useful but I am not sure that is a really reliable metric on its own to base any value around.
I would say initial distribution is the single most important thing to consider when looking at any project in the context of decentralised trustless environment. If you dont care about that then why not just match them up against centralised entities and go invest in those.
Some of those projects could have a million commits and they would still have to over come issues worthy of multiple nobel prizes to complete their white papers promises.
Better to just look for teams that have produced something workable with a real use case that could get some traction.
Those trying to blind you with the latest cool sounding techno babble are soon rendered useless to the next slightly updated design that comes along.
Many of those projects will be abandoned and the same devs will start something new and take the useful code they have created to the next project of which you will get no value from.
Pick reliable dev teams that have been around for years and are producing month in month out real results and have a tangible product that fills a real use case
Sometimes over complexity is only good from blagging funding from those who do not understand it is not required or not even feasible.
BTC with lightening is likely to obliterate a bunch of these "improved latest and greatest designs" simply because it will do all that it needs to and has so much investment and adoption behind it.
There will be room for other alts with specific use cases simply because they are so specific and so well designed that it will take years for them to be supplanted by models that use btc that's not to say btc based alternatives will not arise and rival them in the future too.
|
|
|
|
|
iBenGunArmor (OP)
|
|
March 18, 2018, 03:44:51 PM |
|
this is useful but I am not sure that is a really reliable metric on its own to base any value around.
Some of those projects could have a million commits and they would still have to over come issues worthy of multiple nobel prizes to complete their white papers promises.
Better to just look for teams that have produced something workable with a real use case that could get some traction.
Those trying to blind you with the latest cool sounding techno babble are soon rendered useless to the next slightly updated design that comes along.
Many of those projects will be abandoned and the same devs will start something new and take the useful code they have created to the next project of which you will get no value from.
Pick reliable dev teams that have been around for years and are producing month in month out real results and have a tangible product that fills a real use case
Sometimes over complexity is only good from blagging funding from those who do not understand it is not required or not even feasible.
BTC with lightening is likely to obliterate a bunch of these "improved latest and greatest designs" simply because it will do all that it needs to and has so much investment and adoption behind it.
There will be room for other alts with specific use cases simply because they are so specific and so well designed that it will take years for them to be supplanted by models that use btc that's not to say btc based alternatives will not arise and rival them in the future too.
Information reference, but Yes really need to look at teams, I think the metric of teams and participants based on roles in the project will do, and then it will be possible to conduct a more accurate assessment of the skills of the team and its members separately. And the fact that they will take the code and upgrade it I have no doubt, but we must look at all the data and after their analysis to take note of them or not. PS: Data analysis is the only thing we have for future forecasts. |
|
|
|
|
|
shivansps
|
|
March 19, 2018, 10:58:26 PM |
|
this is useful but I am not sure that is a really reliable metric on its own to base any value around.
I would say initial distribution is the single most important thing to consider when looking at any project in the context of decentralised trustless environment. If you dont care about that then why not just match them up against centralised entities and go invest in those.
Some of those projects could have a million commits and they would still have to over come issues worthy of multiple nobel prizes to complete their white papers promises.
Better to just look for teams that have produced something workable with a real use case that could get some traction.
Those trying to blind you with the latest cool sounding techno babble are soon rendered useless to the next slightly updated design that comes along.
Many of those projects will be abandoned and the same devs will start something new and take the useful code they have created to the next project of which you will get no value from.
Pick reliable dev teams that have been around for years and are producing month in month out real results and have a tangible product that fills a real use case
Sometimes over complexity is only good from blagging funding from those who do not understand it is not required or not even feasible.
BTC with lightening is likely to obliterate a bunch of these "improved latest and greatest designs" simply because it will do all that it needs to and has so much investment and adoption behind it.
There will be room for other alts with specific use cases simply because they are so specific and so well designed that it will take years for them to be supplanted by models that use btc that's not to say btc based alternatives will not arise and rival them in the future too.
Man I absolutely agreee with your statement. However this thread should be considered as additional due diligence tool for those who DYOR. Team is among the first to be considered for investment. But not the only one. There are many factors: market, vision, solution, team, partnerships, development, product, etc. If I look at github and see that the technical team is committed as well as managing team I would be more confident in the project to invest. |
|
|
|
|
