Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 09:45:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Hacking The KNC Firmware: Overclocking  (Read 144307 times)
temen
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 02:00:46 AM
 #741



Your boards are november, mine are october, i don't think they can be pushed as far.

I was more worried about the PCI cables and extenders, but they are nice and cool.

quote

For me i couldn't change almost any values at all before I added heat sinks on the vrms, repositioned the fans etc. Those mods made huge difference. It owould be best to get airflow underneath the vrms also as the sink heat to pcb. Someone said that heatsinks dont add so much but for me it was turning point.

Of course octobers are different and one would want to put full power immediately on, because this way the boards are under great stress. Make the boards warm first before applying "full" power.

For october batch I would consider oil-immersion and injecting voltage after vrms to board. Like getting some huge dc-dc transforming device and using it to power asics. Same time boards sunken into liquid-cooling system.

Lets hope that everybody can max out their hahsrates! But remember: there is a reason why boards are not overclocked from the factory. If you change something and it blows its your fault. dont ignite any fires etc. Safety first, mining third!
1714038355
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714038355

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714038355
Reply with quote  #2

1714038355
Report to moderator
1714038355
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714038355

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714038355
Reply with quote  #2

1714038355
Report to moderator
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714038355
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714038355

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714038355
Reply with quote  #2

1714038355
Report to moderator
1714038355
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714038355

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714038355
Reply with quote  #2

1714038355
Report to moderator
elasticband
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 09:31:10 AM
 #742

I have been running 231 for a few weeks, then 271 for the last few days. I guess i will let you all know how i get on tomorrow morning.

I do have extra cooling and temps range from 41 - 48, i do think over 200 is pushing it. I am trying to tune it down slightly but it comes at a sacrafice of hashrate


still running 291, 810w 790GH, that is a 240GH increase from stock, almost 45%increase from stock
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 20, 2014, 04:48:38 PM
 #743

I have been running 231 for a few weeks, then 271 for the last few days. I guess i will let you all know how i get on tomorrow morning.

I do have extra cooling and temps range from 41 - 48, i do think over 200 is pushing it. I am trying to tune it down slightly but it comes at a sacrafice of hashrate


still running 291, 810w 790GH, that is a 240GH increase from stock, almost 45%increase from stock

nice..  I got some chip heatsinks this week, so I'll try to up it to at least 251 today

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
bondus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 10:31:06 PM
 #744

A warning:

For you brave souls that have enabled all 8 VRMS (early Octobers) I saw today that the 1.0.0 firmware does not apply the voltage adjustment to all 8 VRMs. It only applies it to the 4 that are officially enabled. The old FW applied this adjustment to all VRMs.

The VRMs work in pairs and if the voltage adjustment (VOUT_TRIM register) of the 2 VRMs in a pair is different things will go bad.

If you still want to use all 8 VRMs I suggest you read and understand the datasheet of the VRM.
The VRMs are very resilient to abuse, but they have limits.


Other than that FW 1.0.0 works very good. HW errors have dropped a lot for me. Good chips are close to 0% errors (2% before), bad chips still close to 2%.
sickpig
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 11:03:35 PM
Last edit: February 21, 2014, 12:15:48 AM by sickpig
 #745

A warning:

For you brave souls that have enabled all 8 VRMS (early Octobers) I saw today that the 1.0.0 firmware does not apply the voltage adjustment to all 8 VRMs. It only applies it to the 4 that are officially enabled. The old FW applied this adjustment to all VRMs.

The VRMs work in pairs and if the voltage adjustment (VOUT_TRIM register) of the 2 VRMs in a pair is different things will go bad.

If you still want to use all 8 VRMs I suggest you read and understand the datasheet of the VRM.
The VRMs are very resilient to abuse, but they have limits.


Other than that FW 1.0.0 works very good. HW errors have dropped a lot for me. Good chips are close to 0% errors (2% before), bad chips still close to 2%.

many thanks bondus. very helpful as usual.

So how did you manage to apply the advanced settings to all the VRMs after upgrading to the new firmware? did you just use the old fetch_advanced_settings.cgi or did you also use the old waas executable?


Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 12:41:35 AM
 #746

Any details how we can over clocked October Jupiter with new 1.00 firmware ?
ncs0ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 100


software developer


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 12:44:29 AM
 #747

Any details how we can over clocked October Jupiter with new 1.00 firmware ?
I'm running the same script as I did with the previous firmware.
Works fine as usual.

j03
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 10



View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 12:51:24 AM
 #748

This 1.0 firmware - KnC states you can change clock speeds through the GUI. Can you actually overclock on a per die basis? They were always talking against overclocking and voiding the warranty. Can someone using 1.0 confirm this? Screenshot? Thanks.

1MYwxy8TniWL37y3ueG2cN6i5eQ49Fr19Q
jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 12:57:29 AM
 #749

Can you post again the details and the code please

Also I can delete and copy the code?
kendog77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 01:43:48 AM
 #750

This 1.0 firmware - KnC states you can change clock speeds through the GUI. Can you actually overclock on a per die basis? They were always talking against overclocking and voiding the warranty. Can someone using 1.0 confirm this? Screenshot? Thanks.

Very interesting. I didn't notice this before, but it looks like the default clock of an October Jupiter is 750, and it can be increased to 775 in the 1.0 web GUI.

The default clock of a November Jupiter is 900, and it can be increased to 1000 in the 1.0 web GUI.

I guess it's time to play around now...  Smiley
jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 01:50:23 AM
 #751

How we can do that?

Which option button..
kendog77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 01:52:25 AM
 #752

How we can do that?

Which option button..

Under the "Advanced" tab, each ASIC die now has a pull down menu that allows the user to adjust the chip frequency. It's right beside the voltage pull down button.
j03
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 10



View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 02:06:06 AM
 #753

This 1.0 firmware - KnC states you can change clock speeds through the GUI. Can you actually overclock on a per die basis? They were always talking against overclocking and voiding the warranty. Can someone using 1.0 confirm this? Screenshot? Thanks.

Very interesting. I didn't notice this before, but it looks like the default clock of an October Jupiter is 750, and it can be increased to 775 in the 1.0 web GUI.

The default clock of a November Jupiter is 900, and it can be increased to 1000 in the 1.0 web GUI.

I guess it's time to play around now...  Smiley

Ok only to 775 via the GUI on a October Jupiter. That makes sense. They're not letting people do much. Custom hacks are still the way to go then. Thanks.

1MYwxy8TniWL37y3ueG2cN6i5eQ49Fr19Q
crashoveride54902
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 504


Dream become broken often


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 03:30:13 AM
 #754

A warning:

For you brave souls that have enabled all 8 VRMS (early Octobers) I saw today that the 1.0.0 firmware does not apply the voltage adjustment to all 8 VRMs. It only applies it to the 4 that are officially enabled. The old FW applied this adjustment to all VRMs.

The VRMs work in pairs and if the voltage adjustment (VOUT_TRIM register) of the 2 VRMs in a pair is different things will go bad.

If you still want to use all 8 VRMs I suggest you read and understand the datasheet of the VRM.
The VRMs are very resilient to abuse, but they have limits.


Other than that FW 1.0.0 works very good. HW errors have dropped a lot for me. Good chips are close to 0% errors (2% before), bad chips still close to 2%.

THanks to his help via IRC I was able to update fw and still use my 2 8vrm boards...and my hw error droped down to .11% from .25% yay hopefully it stays that low as i just restarted...Thxs bondus

Dreams of cyprto solving everything is slowly slipping away...Replaced by scams/hacks Sad
arousedrhino
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 05:07:57 AM
 #755

Your issues sound somewhat similar to mine. I did the SD card reset. It works, but the machine seems to like me messing around with it less and less, because the "can't browse to machine IP" issue happened again relatively quickly.

How to do a SD-Card reset? Seems I have a bricked KnCMiner...

Hello,

I seemed to have that problem in early January. Following the guide here http://forum.kncminer.com/forum/main-category/hardware/23664-how-to-restore-a-broken-beaglebone-without-the-need-to-rma really helped me out.

If you have a mac you don't need to get an Ubuntu Live USB/CD, if you don't have a mac or linux PC then you need to get the Ubuntu Live USB/CD to format the micro-sd card.

Also make sure you micro-sd card is under 4 GB (Tip: Radioshack does not have them, Walgreens does though) 

Best of luck getting it back up and running!
elasticband
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 08:10:14 AM
 #756

still running 291/790GH/810w oct. jupiter  Cool
sickpig
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 08:38:31 AM
 #757

A warning:

For you brave souls that have enabled all 8 VRMS (early Octobers) I saw today that the 1.0.0 firmware does not apply the voltage adjustment to all 8 VRMs. It only applies it to the 4 that are officially enabled. The old FW applied this adjustment to all VRMs.

The VRMs work in pairs and if the voltage adjustment (VOUT_TRIM register) of the 2 VRMs in a pair is different things will go bad.

If you still want to use all 8 VRMs I suggest you read and understand the datasheet of the VRM.
The VRMs are very resilient to abuse, but they have limits.


Other than that FW 1.0.0 works very good. HW errors have dropped a lot for me. Good chips are close to 0% errors (2% before), bad chips still close to 2%.

THanks to his help via IRC I was able to update fw and still use my 2 8vrm boards...and my hw error droped down to .11% from .25% yay hopefully it stays that low as i just restarted...Thxs bondus

do you care to share bondus help?

Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:53:47 AM
Last edit: February 21, 2014, 12:44:31 PM by jelin1984
 #758

how i can delete the code
and put the new one code?

any new code

is safe to have amper at 50 a or will detsroy it?


Miner Status
Mining Status

CGMiner Status   Running (pid=19609)
Last Checked   Fri Feb 21 12:44:19 UTC 2014
Avg. Hash Rate   645 Gh/s
Difficulty Accepted   44,096
Difficulty Rejected   352 (0.8 %)
Hardware Errors   704 (1.5 %)
WU   9,025
Difficulty Stale   0
Network Blocks   3
Pool Rejected   0.8 %
Pool Stale   0
Best Share   7,434
Found Blocks   0
HW Status

ASIC slot #1   52.0 ℃
ASIC slot #2   -
ASIC slot #3   56.5 ℃
ASIC slot #4   55.0 ℃
ASIC slot #5   40.5 ℃
ASIC slot #6   -
ASIC Board Status
Update ASIC Status
Last updated on Fri Feb 21 12:17:41 2014

ASIC Board   Info
0   
Temperature sensor: 33.0 C

Die ID   Cores ON   Cores OFF   %
0   48   0   100
1   48   0   100
2   48   0   100
3   48   0   100
DC/DC ID   ON/OFF   Status   Input Voltage   Output Voltage   Output Current
0   ON   OK   11.8 V   0.782 V   40.1 A (31.4 W)
1   No DC/DC detected
2   ON   OK   11.8 V   0.798 V   39.8 A (31.8 W)
3   No DC/DC detected
4   ON   OK   11.9 V   0.785 V   41.2 A (32.3 W)
5   No DC/DC detected
6   No DC/DC detected
7   ON   OK   11.8 V   0.771 V   41.2 A (31.8 W)
2   
Temperature sensor: 35.5 C

Die ID   Cores ON   Cores OFF   %
0   48   0   100
1   48   0   100
2   48   0   100
3   48   0   100
DC/DC ID   ON/OFF   Status   Input Voltage   Output Voltage   Output Current
0   ON   OK   11.8 V   0.751 V   41.1 A (30.9 W)
1   No DC/DC detected
2   ON   OK   11.9 V   0.781 V   42 A (32.8 W)
3   No DC/DC detected
4   ON   OK   12 V   0.789 V   41.6 A (32.8 W)
5   No DC/DC detected
6   No DC/DC detected
7   ON   OK   11.8 V   0.804 V   42.4 A (34.1 W)
3   
Temperature sensor: 35.5 C

Die ID   Cores ON   Cores OFF   %
0   48   0   100
1   48   0   100
2   48   0   100
3   48   0   100
DC/DC ID   ON/OFF   Status   Input Voltage   Output Voltage   Output Current
0   ON   OK   11.9 V   0.783 V   40.7 A (31.9 W)
1   No DC/DC detected
2   ON   OK   11.8 V   0.748 V   41.9 A (31.3 W)
3   No DC/DC detected
4   ON   OK   11.9 V   0.778 V   42.6 A (33.1 W)
5   No DC/DC detected
6   No DC/DC detected
7   ON   OK   12 V   0.785 V   41.5 A (32.6 W)
4   
Temperature sensor: 31.0 C

Die ID   Cores ON   Cores OFF   %
0   48   0   100
1   48   0   100
2   48   0   100
3   48   0   100
DC/DC ID   ON/OFF   Status   Input Voltage   Output Voltage   Output Current
0   ON   OK   11.9 V   0.789 V   40.4 A (31.9 W)
1   No DC/DC detected
2   ON   OK   11.8 V   0.792 V   40.8 A (32.3 W)
3   No DC/DC detected
4   ON   OK   11.9 V   0.783 V   41.4 A (32.4 W)
5   No DC/DC detected
6   No DC/DC detected
7   ON   OK   11.9 V   0.808 V   42.2 A (34.1 W)
Total DC/DC power output: 517 W
Powell
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 486
Merit: 262

rm -rf stupidity


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:53:37 PM
 #759

Got my second October 4VRM Jupiter in and on first bootup worked fine for a few hours.  I updated to 1.0 to test and I noticed when I turned off SPI Auto this:



I've tried the hit it with SPI 3.3 and max voltage.  Let it run a few hours like that.  I have had them drop when OC to high but this I can't seem to rescue.



There is it at max voltage on that one.  I've swapped back to .99.1 , .99.2 and 1.0 and can't seem to get it to jump back up.

I've tried running 231 and 221 but sadly nothing helped kick that one up even.  Sad

Any other suggestions so I can put this Jupiter to a happy # Wink
j03
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 10



View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 11:07:16 PM
 #760

still running 291/790GH/810w oct. jupiter  Cool

291?! Hot damn! Smiley

1MYwxy8TniWL37y3ueG2cN6i5eQ49Fr19Q
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!