Message to Lauda

[Text]

Hello, I made this topic so Lauda can read this publicly since he  blocked me from sending him a private message. I just want you to know that it is already 2 months that you left me negative rating and include me on the list of offering bumping service. I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes and please for give me. I'm hoping that you will give back my neutral trust, thank you.

[EcuaMobi]

I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes

What did you do? In the feedback you left to Lauda you said you didn't post on ICO thread to spam or bump for a service, and that the accusation was false.
What exactly are you apologizing for?

[TheUltraElite]

Offering ICO bumping services make an ICO look legitimate in front of investors who may not have an account here and will fall for that ICO. The said ICO may be using the bumping service to promote themselves and to hide negative comments about them as well. The said ICO may turn scam - which has happened in many cases specially those with bumping service.

I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes

What did you do? In the feedback you left to Lauda you said you didn't post on ICO thread to spam or bump for a service, and that the accusation was false.
What exactly are you apologizing for?

He/She wants Lauda to remove their negative trust so that they can continue using the account here for "other" purposes.
OP can forget about Lauda reponding here.

[TMAN]

Hello, I made this topic so Lauda can read this publicly since he  blocked me from sending him a private message. I just want you to know that it is already 2 months that you left me negative rating and include me on the list of offering bumping service. I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes and please for give me. I'm hoping that you will give back my neutral trust, thank you.

Wont happen, move on... you will personally find a fix for wold hunger before it happens.

1) you deserved it
2) your retaliatory neg is fucking idiotic

[Sellingaccs]

This forum is what it is currently, because of people like you. You make shady projects get fake hype by posting on their threads.

You got busted with alot of people and maybe you should have thought alot more, before applying for "ANN Bumping services.

He/She wants Lauda to remove their negative trust so that they can continue using the account here for "other" purposes.
OP can forget about Lauda reponding here.

Well, Lauda usually does not answer trash threads.
OP has also been harassing Lauda about this subject for months as i just checked his posts.

The negative trust is totally a good thing so Text cannot spam on sig campaigns with his trashy posts.

2) your retaliatory neg is fucking idiotic

No! He is just telling what he thinks of the project, you're such a liar

[Quickseller]

I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes

What did you do? In the feedback you left to Lauda you said you didn't post on ICO thread to spam or bump for a service, and that the accusation was false.

It looks like lauda is claiming that there is evidence the OP was offering ICO bumping services as per this thread. There are many screenshots of PMs, the authenticity of which was confirmed by ibminer.

I would have to look through all the screenshots to see what the OP said exactly, however I remember that many people were offering services that would be truly bad for the community, and some were merely asking for more information about the services being requested. I don’t remember which would best describe the OP

Edit: it looks like the OP has negative trust as a result of this screenshot


I am not sure if there is evidence to connect the OP to mysterious01 or not.

[Text]

I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes

What did you do? In the feedback you left to Lauda you said you didn't post on ICO thread to spam or bump for a service, and that the accusation was false.
What exactly are you apologizing for?

Sorry I forgot to remove the negative feedback I've given to him (removing it now after this reply). I admit that I posted on some ANN threads of projects from telegram channel offers but I have no bad intentions or even to scam.

Hello, I made this topic so Lauda can read this publicly since he  blocked me from sending him a private message. I just want you to know that it is already 2 months that you left me negative rating and include me on the list of offering bumping service. I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes and please for give me. I'm hoping that you will give back my neutral trust, thank you.

Wont happen, move on... you will personally find a fix for wold hunger before it happens.

1) you deserved it
2) your retaliatory neg is fucking idiotic

Yeah I deserved this but its already 2 months ago. I remember that I have been also banned before this by a moderator from wearing signature because of spamming for a month.

It was only a trap.

Offering ICO bumping services make an ICO look legitimate in front of investors who may not have an account here and will fall for that ICO. The said ICO may be using the bumping service to promote themselves and to hide negative comments about them as well. The said ICO may turn scam - which has happened in many cases specially those with bumping service.

I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes

What did you do? In the feedback you left to Lauda you said you didn't post on ICO thread to spam or bump for a service, and that the accusation was false.
What exactly are you apologizing for?

He/She wants Lauda to remove their negative trust so that they can continue using the account here for "other" purposes.
OP can forget about Lauda reponding here.

Like what I am saying, I have no bad intentions to promote scam. I only post questions and ask about the project.

[EcuaMobi]

I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes

What did you do? In the feedback you left to Lauda you said you didn't post on ICO thread to spam or bump for a service, and that the accusation was false.
What exactly are you apologizing for?

Sorry I forgot to remove the negative feedback I've given to him (removing it now after this reply). I admit that I posted on some ANN threads of projects from telegram channel offers but I have no bad intentions or even to scam.

So you recognize you blatantly lied in the feedback you initially left?
I truly believe in second chances but thirds are another deal. You promoted ICOs without caring whether they're scams and you blatantly lied.
I wouldn't recommend Lauda to remove this negative trust. I may add one myself if he does.

[Text]

I think its enough to pay for what I have done before. Sorry for my mistakes

What did you do? In the feedback you left to Lauda you said you didn't post on ICO thread to spam or bump for a service, and that the accusation was false.
What exactly are you apologizing for?

Sorry I forgot to remove the negative feedback I've given to him (removing it now after this reply). I admit that I posted on some ANN threads of projects from telegram channel offers but I have no bad intentions or even to scam.

So you recognize you blatantly lied in the feedback you initially left?
I truly believe in second chances but thirds are another deal. You promoted ICOs without caring whether they're scams and you blatantly lied.
I wouldn't recommend Lauda to remove this negative trust. I may add one myself if he does.

I never promoted those ICO, I just posted comment like asking questions about the project.

It seems that I have no chance now to recover my neutral trust so okay I'll just move on and stop hoping that something good will happen regarding this.

Why there are so many people are pulling others down instead of helping them to improve, to learn more... Do they really success?

[Alone055]

it looks like the OP has negative trust as a result of this screenshot


I am not sure if there is evidence to connect the OP to mysterious01 or not.

Can you seriously not find OPs username in the list of Mysterious01's "Thread Bumpers" or you are just pretending not to?  
Well, let me guide you a bit in here. 13th username from the bottom is what you need to see from that screenshot, because that is the reason why he (OP) got his negative tag.

Mysterious01 was offering thread bumping services having users working under him. So he used to get-together users and pay them to bump particular threads, and he used to charge the OPs of those threads for this service. OP (Text) as we can see in the screenshot, was under his (Mysterious01's) payroll for doing so, like many other users.

Correct me if I am wrong, anyone.

[Quickseller]

Correct me if I am wrong, anyone.

There is not anything besides that guy’s word that the OP is the same as that guy....

The screenshot might warrant further investigation to see if a connection can be made however it is not proof of anything.

The OP claims to have responded to bounties on telegram to ask questions about various ICOs.

[Alone055]

The screenshot might warrant further investigation to see if a connection can be made however it is not proof of anything.

What further investigation do you think is needed if the guy mentions OP's name in the list of his thread bumpers?  Well, I don't think Mysterious01 had randomly chosen some users to put them in his list while dealing with someone as shown in the screenshot. OP must have been working for him, and that is why his name is in that list, and that is exactly why he was tagged. I don't see any complications in that. Besides, OP said it himself that he has done it and he is now sorry for it as it has been two months already. So there is no point in depending him as what he was doing was not decent for people of the community.

The OP claims to have responded to bounties on telegram to ask questions about various ICOs.

Well everyone have the right to make excuses. We are not supposed to take them seriously, are we? 

[Quickseller]

The screenshot might warrant further investigation to see if a connection can be made however it is not proof of anything.

What further investigation do you think is needed if the guy mentions OP's name in the list of his thread bumpers?  Well, I don't think Mysterious01 had randomly chosen some users to put them in his list while dealing with someone as shown in the screenshot.

The screenshot was someone responding to an advertisement offering a payment up front if “proof” of accounts available to bump threads were provided. It would be possible that guy was giving a list of accounts he doesn’t control with the hopes of scamming the up front payment. I find it hard to believe this even needs to be said...

[Blue Tyrant]

~snip~

While what you said might be possible for other similarly tagged accounts let's just say OP dug his own grave

I never promoted those ICO, I just posted comment like asking questions about the project.

He pretty much admitted he did engage in bumping for pay so for this one I suppose the mark stays with no further debate on the validity for this claim. Now only defence he has is whether he can somehow magically convince the DTs to remove the trust for whatever reason

[suchmoon]

The OP claims to have responded to bounties on telegram to ask questions about various ICOs.

Isn't that kind of bumping exactly why he got red tagged?

[Text]

At first, why did they offer that kind of service if it not allowed?

I bump the thread cause I just posted a comment but I don't create such positive reviews to look it a legit one as like what they thought, I just post questions about the project to consider as entry, hope you understand. Is anyone got scammed from those ICO/s? So for me, I really don't deserve this red tagged.

[Quickseller]

~snip~

While what you said might be possible for other similarly tagged accounts let's just say OP dug his own grave

I never promoted those ICO, I just posted comment like asking questions about the project.

He pretty much admitted he did engage in bumping for pay so for this one I suppose the mark stays with no further debate on the validity for this claim. Now only defence he has is whether he can somehow magically convince the DTs to remove the trust for whatever reason

mysterious01 was offering to artificially keep ANN threads on the 1st page via fake conversations within those threads, while the OP was offering his services to make a single post (or a very small number of posts) by way of engaging in a discussion with other users. I think there is a very big difference between these two things.

I don't think what the OP was engaging in is not all that different than what "community managers" are frequently paid to do.

I would also point out that in the past, users have been given incentives to post in the thread of what they are advertising. 

[Theb]

I don't think that OP is the one who has the obligation to know whether the ICO is a scam or not as its more of a Bounty Manager's job, at least that the way I look at it. But you are right bumping services for their ANN thread can contribute to scam especially when you are just posting worthless things in order for their thread to stay on top. Some of the worst things I saw are just the words "bump", "up", or even "^" which doesn't really contribute anything to a thread.

[maeusi]

I don't think that OP is the one who has the obligation to know whether the ICO is a scam or not as its more of a Bounty Manager's job, at least that the way I look at it. But you are right bumping services for their ANN thread can contribute to scam especially when you are just posting worthless things in order for their thread to stay on top. Some of the worst things I saw are just the words "bump", "up", or even "^" which doesn't really contribute anything to a thread.

The thread was opened by a "newbie" and clearly offering payment for bumping Ann threads. Applicants were warned by several members there but some nevertheless offered their services. It is the responsibility of each one of us to avoid those shady activities, not only of bounty/campaign managers.

[Alone055]

mysterious01 was offering to artificially keep ANN threads on the 1st page via fake conversations within those threads, while the OP was offering his services to make a single post (or a very small number of posts) by way of engaging in a discussion with other users. I think there is a very big difference between these two things.

What is the difference between them you think?  Mysterious01 was offering the service to keep ANNs on top by regularly posting in them, and He had a list of users who would do those postings to keep bumping ANNs to get paid by Him (Mysterious01). Now OP (Text) was one of the users to do one or more than one posts in a thread by a way of engaging but with the purpose of bumping it only to complete his task and get paid for it. What is the very big difference in these two that you are talking about?

I don't think what the OP was engaging in is not all that different than what "community managers" are frequently paid to do.

Community managers are given the responsibility of managing those threads. They don't just engage in there to keep their threads on top, but they do their work in the thread which they are supposed to do. You can't compare these two situations at all.
They won't just let you take charge of a surgery in an ICU as that is not your work and you are not allowed to do it. Now you can't say that if the doctor can do it, why can't I? 

I would also point out that in the past, users have been given incentives to post in the thread of what they are advertising. 

That thing was abandoned later on when admins started to lock down the threads having such a rule in them. So we better live in present, without doing the things that are not allowed now but were done in the past.