Some attention to this...

[1993jochico]

I need an approval from the community if this one deserves to be posted here before I add to the list and lock this thread. Thank you.

Upon searching on Marketplace > Services about some merit give aways to good quality post and will try to earn some I see something wrong in this THREAD.

I am needing 9 merits to rank. Thank you sir!

This sentence caught my attention, so I review his profile...
Aside from those not too much quality post, as I review OP profile I notice that he only give some good amount of merit to this 2 user.



And as my curiosity already brings me there, I take a look to their merit summary and notice that these accounts are connected.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=882355   -Wesimon
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1214113 -Dingdong7
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1323511 -tianok21
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1146986 -Wyne
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1022170 -Chanock

My conclusion here is that the purpose of that "Free Merit for quality post" is to distribute his merits to his alts.

EDIT: In addition I also found this.


VERY VERY WRONG MOVE!

[1713572023]

1713572023

[1713572023]

1713572023

[1713572023]

1713572023

[1713572023]

1713572023

[1713572023]

1713572023

[xIIImaL]

Nice catch mate. Hope there are no additional work needed since Lauda marked them in red tag. You may increase your knowledge and help the forum as much you can dude. Good luck.

so now you need to get merits to become a higher rank member?

Whats wrong there to get the merits when he is doing good work mate? If you doing the quality posts such technical assistance or assist somebodies query initially you may also get the merits dude. Please do not troll someone. Instead go ahead to read the pinned topics in all the section. Good day

[1993jochico]

Nice catch mate. Hope there are no additional work needed since Lauda marked them in red tag. You may increase your knowledge and help the forum as much you can dude. Good luck.

This is a new set of his alts sir, not the ones that tagged on the screenshot. I will edit the post with their ID's.

[jackg]

Nice catch mate. Hope there are no additional work needed since Lauda marked them in red tag. You may increase your knowledge and help the forum as much you can dude. Good luck.

This is a new set of his alts sir, not the ones that tagged on the screenshot. I will edit the post with their ID's.

Maybe try contacting Lauda to request they update their red trust on those accounts. That's a lot of accounts in the same network though. A ridiculous number of accounts used to get whatever he wants to get from them (not entirely sure what it is however). Keep a lookout for other accounts related to those alts as well!

[Silent26]

So this is the revelation of Mr. Wesimon's true motivate isn't? Well, keep up the good work Mr. 1993jochico. Looks like you're really contributing well in our Forum. I'm sure that you will be rewarded for your hard working eliminating these Merit abusers.
I will try to do the same thing you were doing later on (I'm a really busy Man) . There are bunch of people who really abused Merits and you can't eliminate them alone.
Well, keep it up.

[greeklogos]

If I would still have some merits I would give them all to you. This is really good and helpful work you've done. I hope your work will not stay unnoticed and those profiles will be punished the way it necessary to be done.

[1993jochico]

searing case cleared.  LEGIT USER NOT SOLD!

[Steamtyme]

So now that you've tried to delete the original thread  you made you are putting it somewhere else.

Here is the original thread OP  deleted almost this exact same post except that you have less blatantly suggested searings account has been sold.

://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3220573.0

Why couldn't you keep the original post??

vlad230 is so lucky Im sure its not his alt

But I still cant go to a conclusion about this, If this is really a mistake because according on his merit summary he already send a merit from feb.1 and also he already receives merit I wonder why he is still ignorant about the merit system.

The first time I see this I completely conclude that this person just accidentally send 15 and 34 merits but...



I noticed that this person must have knowledge about the merit system because he has sent and received merit points already.
Merit Summary

EDIT: From here I have a suspicion that this account maybe sold to someone thats why he has no idea about the system.

Please give your opinion.

NOTE: Im not accusing anyone this is to clarify if this is a kind of merit abuse or account searing is sold.

EDIT: quoted the post this time so you can't just delete it. While you might be trying to do some good, stop tossing mud sround hoping it will stick. If you want to keep this up do your own research before posting

[Silent26]

So now that you've tried to delete the originsl thread  you made you are putting it somewhere else.

Here is the original thread OP  deleted almost this exact same post except that you have less blatantly suggested searings account has been sold.

://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3220573.0

Why couldn't you keep the original post??

EDIT: quoted the post this time so you can't just delete it. While you might be trying to do some good, stop tossing mud sround hoping it will stick. If you want to keep this up do your own research before posting

Sorry Mr. Steamtyme, but it is not 1993jochico's idea to delete his recently thread. I'm the one who told him to move his thread or just make a single thread that contains all of the information he gathered. That is why he decided to delete that thread and move the information here. Here is what I said in his thread which can be found here

Hey 1993jochico, you've been posted/created so many threads about your investigations/suspicions about Merit abusers. I only suggest that you should make a single thread where all of the informations you gathered are compiled. Actually you already have a thread about Merit abuser right? Why don't you just keep editing that thread if your gonna update more suspicious Members and keep it bump.

My apologies. He has posted a lot of thread containing different information about Merit abusers that's why I ask him to do such a thing. Because posting thread over and over again with his "Merit Abuser" topic can lead to spamming the Meta section.

[1993jochico]

So now that you've tried to delete the originsl thread  you made you are putting it somewhere else.

Here is the original thread OP  deleted almost this exact same post except that you have less blatantly suggested searings account has been sold.

://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3220573.0

Why couldn't you keep the original post??



EDIT: quoted the post this time so you can't just delete it. While you might be trying to do some good, stop tossing mud sround hoping it will stick. If you want to keep this up do your own research before posting

Ok, Lets tackle about the discussion here.

1. I want to ask you if sending 49 merits isnt an abuse?
2. Are you familiar to those legendary and some reputable members before that sends 50 merits and get tagged when the merit system is newly introduce?

As Clearly quoted above I did not delete it I just move it here to reduce the same topic posted.

And I also do my research on my reports, I didnt report this yet Im soliciting others opinion for this.
If you read carefully that post you will understand why this searing account is suspicious.


"Because what I am telling here is that he must had already the knowledge about merit system because he already receive and send before that means he already experience the system, but why he still asking about it and ignorant about the system, that's is why I suspected that account was sold."

That is the whole meaning of the post in case you dont clearly understand, I cant make it more simplier than that.

[Steamtyme]

So now that you've tried to delete the originsl thread  you made you are putting it somewhere else.

Here is the original thread OP  deleted almost this exact same post except that you have less blatantly suggested searings account has been sold.

://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3220573.0

Why couldn't you keep the original post??



EDIT: quoted the post this time so you can't just delete it. While you might be trying to do some good, stop tossing mud sround hoping it will stick. If you want to keep this up do your own research before posting

Ok, Lets tackle about the discussion here.

1. I want to ask you if sending 49 merits isnt an abuse?
2. Are you familiar to those legendary and some reputable members before that sends 50 merits and get tagged when the merit system is newly introduce?

As Clearly quoted above I did not delete it I just move it here to reduce the same topic posted.

And I also do my research on my reports, I didnt report this yet Im soliciting others opinion for this.
If you read carefully that post you will understand why this searing account is suspicious.


"Because what I am telling here is that he must had already the knowledge about merit system because he already receive and send before that means he already experience the system, but why he still asking about it and ignorant about the system, that's is why I suspected that account was sold."

That is the whole meaning of the post in case you dont clearly understand, I cant make it more simplier than that.

1) No it is not Merit abuse. People can decide to send out Merit as they see fit. So if Searing decides that the thread was worth 49 to them than that's where it ends. Merit is subjective.  If it where Merit abuse you would have been able to quote the broken rule.

2) Anyone who would have been tagged in those instances would have either been proven to have alt accounts or had a history of back and forth merit trading.

You did delete the post and ask for the thread to be deleted, you then changed it up slightly and slid it Into this thread. What Silent26 suggested was all of your random and researched suspicions/accusations should be in the same thread. If I'm not mistaken could you not have just locked the thread and left it at that?

This is not that, you created another thread for a single situation and then slid this one in there.

I've already addressed your "suspicions" the fact remains you do not need community support. If you want to sling mud have the balls to stand by it, come up with your own proof, don't just toss this out there and ask the community to decide  for you.

Your meaning is clear your process needs improvement. You think that by continuing down this path you will be merited continuously and rank up. I doubt it people will get sick of all your posts, as is represented by your "neutral" I would say.
Don't bother trying to explain it further I have said my piece do with it what you will.

[1993jochico]

I think even if I explain it 100 times to you, you will not still get my point.
As friendly advise please read some threads about merit abuse and you will be enlighten.

Your meaning is clear your process needs improvement. You think that by continuing down this path you will be merited continuously and rank up. I doubt it people will get sick of all your posts, as is represented by your "neutral" I would say.

The process is enough https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3182306.0
I just do how others report those merit abusers.

Are you jealous, why it seems you are the ones reported why are you so affected?

Don't bother trying to explain it further I have said my piece do with it what you will.

You made my day, this sentence makes me laugh.

We may both shut up dude, do what you want and Ill continue what Im doing.

Ignored 

[Searing]

So I am 'notorious' for NOT knowing about sMerits? Man, I'm screwed...there is lots and lots I don't know about...including not selling some BTC

at the 18k high price

As to giving sMerits....big whoop...he can divvy them out to those in need or I can do so on my own..that what his thread is for....I sent him 16 sMerits
...then I was gonna send him more...so I sent him another 34 ...you can only do 50 to one person per day it said....thus learned something else...
...so I donated some to that thread to pass along

anyway, ask around on here if I am legit or not...I have references on here..just look at my profile...pick a random user I've done stuff for or bought stuff

and see if I am still being me....they will be amused and reply to me that folk are asking about my account being hacked etc

otherwise, anything I say won't be believed anyway by those that think that I'm not me, when I really am me, supposedly under the name here Searing...is me..

(hmm....confused myself on which is what

Also at my rank....I'm kinda past the point where sMerits matter much....thus farmed some out....again, big whoop....you'll also see from my profile I've done

escrow for NO PAY either....so yeah...that likely don't make sense either...so sMerits never really tweaked my radar...in that I gave a few out..but seemed to gain

a few ..so was NOT paying a lot of attention on the in/out numbers...

Anyway,

well, hell at least someone, someplace thinks I'm a 'dangerous sort' its a start (I'm kinda dull...nice to be noticed...)

[digaran]

Snip.

You have posted this topic to report about 6 merits being sent out and then adding Brad Pitt's 49 sent merits. very very wrong move.
After sending 49 or 50 to somebody else, if he had received the same amount or more from a merit source and then exchanged them with others, report that. Searing has taken a few hits of a dead trout, it could be the reason for him being confused.

I have already posted a topic about what vlad230 and others are doing with their reviewing service to be a waste of time because there is not enough merits to distribute. Searing could have done this to make what vlad230 is doing appealing.

We may both shut up dude, do what you want and Ill continue what Im doing.

What you are doing is a waste of time. you should find 20-50 sent merits to a garbage post and report 10 cases at once. not to request negative trust on their profiles, but for the staff to void their merit transactions. tagging people for posting garbage, sending merits to garbage posts is wrong.

[1993jochico]

You have posted this topic to report about 6 merits being sent out and then adding Brad Pitt's 49 sent merits. very very wrong move.
After sending 49 or 50 to somebody else, if he had received the same amount or more from a merit source and then exchanged them with others, report that. Searing has taken a few hits of a dead trout, it could be the reason for him being confused.

If you read the OP sir you should know that its not only about 6 merits.

Yes I know, but my point here is the account maybe sold but after searing replies its already cleared to me that the account is not sold and he is just really blind about the system and Im convinced to delete that.

What you are doing is a waste of time. you should find 20-50 sent merits to a garbage post and report 10 cases at once. not to request negative trust on their profiles, but for the staff to void their merit transactions. tagging people for posting garbage, sending merits to garbage posts is wrong.

Its not a waste of time sir please read the full OP.

[1993jochico]

After searing proves that he is the original user of the account...