FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC🏎Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest

[LTU_btc]

Hi long time no reply. Still love the faucet and sing its praises. Just a couple questions!

In the recent referrals commissions, is it displaying the sum of multiple days? if so how many?

I heard there might be a rebrand including more coins? is there an ETA or confirmation of th at?

Thanks  again!

If I'm not mistaken, recent display commission since the last weekly payout, which are made on Sunday.
I think they planned to add Dogecoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash and maybe some other coins, but maybe their plans changed since the initial announcement. I asked for more details about new website few weeks ago, but TheQuin don't have more information currently.

[1713283576]

1713283576

[1713283576]

1713283576

[1713283576]

1713283576

[broke_tradah]

How can I access the mining thing here at freebitco.in? Can't seem to find it now. 😅

Thanks. 😊

We discontinued it over 6 months ago.

Incorrect.  As per usual TheQuack is applying snake oil to his answers.  You were FORCED to remove it by Malwarebytes because it was loading at random without the users knowledge.  If you're going to spew out words,  they might as well include some truth.  https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/231469-freebitcoin-being-blocked/

[hypersonic1]

How can I access the mining thing here at freebitco.in? Can't seem to find it now. 😅

Thanks. 😊

We discontinued it over 6 months ago.

Incorrect.  As per usual TheQuack is applying snake oil to his answers.  You were FORCED to remove it by Malwarebytes because it was loading at random without the users knowledge.  If you're going to spew out words,  they might as well include some truth.  https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/231469-freebitcoin-being-blocked/

I've read a lot of your material? You seem to have a lot against this faucet? Your justifications for it seem to be "the end justifies the means". It is a great public service and those who chose to gamble choose to accept to lose. the house edge really isn't any worse than the safest bet in roulette. Stop trying to paint them as taking your money.

[TheQuin]

Hi long time no reply. Still love the faucet and sing its praises. Just a couple questions!

In the recent referrals commissions, is it displaying the sum of multiple days? if so how many?

I heard there might be a rebrand including more coins? is there an ETA or confirmation of th at?

Thanks  again!

If I'm not mistaken, recent display commission since the last weekly payout, which are made on Sunday.
I think they planned to add Dogecoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash and maybe some other coins, but maybe their plans changed since the initial announcement. I asked for more details about new website few weeks ago, but TheQuin don't have more information currently.

That's correct, recent is since the last weekly payout.

[broke_tradah]

I've read a lot of your material?.....Stop trying to paint them as taking your money.

Lol facts are not attempting to "paint" anything,  they are simply facts.  And if you actually READ anything,  you'd know why I point out all the lies that come out of TheQuack's mouth because I have no qualms stating it and have done so many times and it has absolutely NOTHING to do with losing anything and everything to do with he's just a complete ass in how he treats people.  So,  I treat him the same way he treats myself as well as everyone else.  Like shit.  I am actually one of their top referrals and when your top salesman is talking shit about you,  then you know something is seriously wrong with whatever the hell it is you're doing that would make the sales guy say such things.

If you're lookin for proof that this whole freebitco is provably fair thing is essentially a scam,  look no further than the 2 screenshots below.  As you can see,  the rolls mysteriously stop at 9993 and 9994, 9995, 9996, 9997, 9998, 9999, and 10000 are ALL missing,  yet 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 as well as 9993, 9992, 9991 and so on all exist.  The reason you dont see a 9994 or higher is because 9994 is EXACTLY the roll you need to start getting into the top 3 tiers of the faucet. So much for "Provably fair" idea,  this is clear evidence to the contrary  LMFAO.  Over 19000+ rolls.  The odds of a roll of exactly 10000 missing in ~20000 rolls is very low but not unreasonably low (less than 10%).  The odds of ALL of them missing IN ORDER is so small that this post couldnt fit the amount of 0.000000's it would require.  It would fill up the server's HD with 0's its so small.  But since I dont really care about free rolls,  this obvious blocking of roll results above 9993 doesnt bother me.  The income I get the most from are referrals,  not free rolls.  However,  it really pisses me off when people think the site itself is legit when clearly it IS NOT and these statistics prove it.  What you're looking at is a log of free rolls, rolled by a bot 24/7 every day for the last year and a half or so maybe slightly more.  These rolls are all from 3 accounts,  mine, my wife, and my annoying teeniebopper.

So what you're looking at is very good proof that "provably fair" is only "provably fair" when they want it to be (which is obviously only going to be when it benefits THEM,  not you).  I fully believe my accounts are on this blacklist (likely because of my bot use but I dont care).  So this just goes to show that "provably fair" is not so "provably fair" after all because in order to block an account from getting certain rolls, you have to MANIPULATE the roll result itself which in theory should result in those "provably fair" links showing incorrect results,  but as far as I've seen,  they never have shown any sign of such meddling.  But with statistics like this,  I really dont need to rely upon provably fair.  I can see the pattern in my results DB as they are now without the need for provably fair links.  I wouldnt doubt that the same shenanigans go on for the "multiply game" rolling as well.  Bottom line is,  all this "provably fair" non-sense that you see going on is just that,  non-sense.  It's very possible to manipulate results if you're the server side of the equation.  Its only nearly impossible for the client side to manipulate results (finding collisions within seconds isnt really viable but mathematically it is possible) because you can only control 1 of 4 parts of the equation while the server controls the other 3.  The only true way to have a "provably fair" system would be to put every roll in a BTC transaction as well as removing the server's seed and replacing it with the BTC hash so that it cant be changed by the server or client but that would make for a slow as molasses end user experience.  Tron and ETH however can do this reasonably well.  Why freebitco DOESNT switch to a blockchain.... well,  it doesnt take a genius to figure that one out.  They want to maintain the ability to modify roll results under the guise of them being "provably fair" when in reality its only SOMETIMES provably fair.

I think the only "provably fair" anything on freebitco is probably the Lottery since it DOES use BTC hashes for it's server seed.  All the others are just garbage and completely manipulatable by freebitco anytime they please as it proven by my db statistics.

https://image.prntscr.com/image/94Tu32EtTPKMGx2N5YNoXQ.png


https://image.prntscr.com/image/RbcQKemWQr25Jb73QjUZ6A.png

[Poolak]

hello, i need your help.
i lost my accss to my old gmail (the one in freebitco.in account). how can i change it ?
i sent emails in freebitco.in site too (twice) but i didn't get any answer (same as here) 
please tell me what can i do

with appreciation

[TheQuin]

hello, i need your help.
i lost my accss to my old gmail (the one in freebitco.in account). how can i change it ?
i sent emails in freebitco.in site too (twice) but i didn't get any answer (same as here) 
please tell me what can i do

with appreciation

Sign a message from the Bitcoin address in the profile or an address you deposited from requesting the email change. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0

Email it to support or send it to me in a PM here.

[Poolak]

OMG cancel the withdraw !!!
 

[Poolak]

doesn't matter anymore
forgot that account , the money went where i didn't want.
so just forget my last msg

[TheQuin]

OMG cancel the withdraw !!!
 

There is very little time between a withdraw being confirmed from the email link we sent you and it getting confirmed on the Bitcoin network, so the chances of us being able to cancel it are almost zero.

[goshko_hubaveca]

hello cheers and happy xmas . sorry if i am posting in the wrong place and manner. first of i like to know. what is the formula for sharing amount equally among all referrals? say i have it set at 100%
example - user 1 gives me 300 satoshi. user 2 gives me 30. and user 3 gives 3 satoshi. are those 333 satoshi devided by the number of users 333/3 then each get 111? or is it user 1 gets 300 user 2 30 and user 3 3 satoshi.
and in the second option share amount based on referral activity. how is the activity calculated? again its set at 100%
example - user 1 gives me 100 satoshi from free rolls. user 2 the same amount 100 from playing high low. and user 3 100 from interest? who is considered more active. and how is that split?
that being sayed. i congratulate you on your site. i did my first btc transfer a few days back as i see btc being the modern day money. so do i your site as being the modern day bank casino and welfare system.

[pangolier88]

I've read a lot of your material?.....Stop trying to paint them as taking your money.

Lol facts are not attempting to "paint" anything,  they are simply facts.  And if you actually READ anything,  you'd know why I point out all the lies that come out of TheQuack's mouth because I have no qualms stating it and have done so many times and it has absolutely NOTHING to do with losing anything and everything to do with he's just a complete ass in how he treats people.  So,  I treat him the same way he treats myself as well as everyone else.  Like shit.  I am actually one of their top referrals and when your top salesman is talking shit about you,  then you know something is seriously wrong with whatever the hell it is you're doing that would make the sales guy say such things.

If you're lookin for proof that this whole freebitco is provably fair thing is essentially a scam,  look no further than the 2 screenshots below.  As you can see,  the rolls mysteriously stop at 9993 and 9994, 9995, 9996, 9997, 9998, 9999, and 10000 are ALL missing,  yet 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 as well as 9993, 9992, 9991 and so on all exist.  The reason you dont see a 9994 or higher is because 9994 is EXACTLY the roll you need to start getting into the top 3 tiers of the faucet. So much for "Provably fair" idea,  this is clear evidence to the contrary  LMFAO.  Over 19000+ rolls.  The odds of a roll of exactly 10000 missing in ~20000 rolls is very low but not unreasonably low (less than 10%).  The odds of ALL of them missing IN ORDER is so small that this post couldnt fit the amount of 0.000000's it would require.  It would fill up the server's HD with 0's its so small.  But since I dont really care about free rolls,  this obvious blocking of roll results above 9993 doesnt bother me.  The income I get the most from are referrals,  not free rolls.  However,  it really pisses me off when people think the site itself is legit when clearly it IS NOT and these statistics prove it.  What you're looking at is a log of free rolls, rolled by a bot 24/7 every day for the last year and a half or so maybe slightly more.  These rolls are all from 3 accounts,  mine, my wife, and my annoying teeniebopper.

So what you're looking at is very good proof that "provably fair" is only "provably fair" when they want it to be (which is obviously only going to be when it benefits THEM,  not you).  I fully believe my accounts are on this blacklist (likely because of my bot use but I dont care).  So this just goes to show that "provably fair" is not so "provably fair" after all because in order to block an account from getting certain rolls, you have to MANIPULATE the roll result itself which in theory should result in those "provably fair" links showing incorrect results,  but as far as I've seen,  they never have shown any sign of such meddling.  But with statistics like this,  I really dont need to rely upon provably fair.  I can see the pattern in my results DB as they are now without the need for provably fair links.  I wouldnt doubt that the same shenanigans go on for the "multiply game" rolling as well.  Bottom line is,  all this "provably fair" non-sense that you see going on is just that,  non-sense.  It's very possible to manipulate results if you're the server side of the equation.  Its only nearly impossible for the client side to manipulate results (finding collisions within seconds isnt really viable but mathematically it is possible) because you can only control 1 of 4 parts of the equation while the server controls the other 3.  The only true way to have a "provably fair" system would be to put every roll in a BTC transaction as well as removing the server's seed and replacing it with the BTC hash so that it cant be changed by the server or client but that would make for a slow as molasses end user experience.  Tron and ETH however can do this reasonably well.  Why freebitco DOESNT switch to a blockchain.... well,  it doesnt take a genius to figure that one out.  They want to maintain the ability to modify roll results under the guise of them being "provably fair" when in reality its only SOMETIMES provably fair.

I think the only "provably fair" anything on freebitco is probably the Lottery since it DOES use BTC hashes for it's server seed.  All the others are just garbage and completely manipulatable by freebitco anytime they please as it proven by my db statistics.

https://image.prntscr.com/image/94Tu32EtTPKMGx2N5YNoXQ.png
https://image.prntscr.com/image/94Tu32EtTPKMGx2N5YNoXQ.png

https://image.prntscr.com/image/RbcQKemWQr25Jb73QjUZ6A.png
https://image.prntscr.com/image/RbcQKemWQr25Jb73QjUZ6A.png

I can confirm everything broke_tradah is saying, i also collected separately a lot of data and proved the same in this thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5045277.0

Of course i got no answer from any admin of the site.

I suggest everyone not to waste your time on this site, chances are that you are inside this "blacklist" and not elegible to roll any number over 9993

[TheQuin]

hello cheers and happy xmas . sorry if i am posting in the wrong place and manner. first of i like to know. what is the formula for sharing amount equally among all referrals? say i have it set at 100%
example - user 1 gives me 300 satoshi. user 2 gives me 30. and user 3 gives 3 satoshi. are those 333 satoshi devided by the number of users 333/3 then each get 111? or is it user 1 gets 300 user 2 30 and user 3 3 satoshi.
and in the second option share amount based on referral activity. how is the activity calculated? again its set at 100%
example - user 1 gives me 100 satoshi from free rolls. user 2 the same amount 100 from playing high low. and user 3 100 from interest? who is considered more active. and how is that split?
that being sayed. i congratulate you on your site. i did my first btc transfer a few days back as i see btc being the modern day money. so do i your site as being the modern day bank casino and welfare system.

No, it is a simple percentage of what you earn from each referral. They get back whatever percentage you set of the total amount they generate for you each week.

[goshko_hubaveca]

thanks for the answer. i am still confused. what is the difference between the two settings share equally and based on activity? i dont want to send satoshi to a referral that i got from another user.

[TheQuin]

i dont want to send satoshi to a referral that i got from another user.

Then use "Share amount based on referral activity since last payout".

[broke_tradah]

Someone who isnt lazy like me should compile all the facts and put this in the Scam accusations thread.  There is absolute undeniable evidence both here in the forums as well as in their own "big win" thread that this shit is rigged with rules that are completely contradictory to their "provably fair" 1 in 10000 roll claims.  I just saw that someone in pangolier88's thread analyzed their "big win" thread and they noticed something I hadnt noticed yet.  That the $20 win percentage has a higher difference percentage when compared to the $200 wins than it otherwise should have.  Good catch.  It's also full of other people who have DB results identical to my own in regards to the obvious 9994+ manipulations with the server seeds.  pangolier88 himself has noticed it twice which is exactly the amount of times he should have had a high probability of getting a result above 9993 for the amount of rolls he had completed.  I didnt bother to record any server seeds because I knew that if there was any cheating going on at all,  that I'd see the pattern in the DB even without them and that is exactly what transpired.  Besides,  recording the server seed and then complaining about it would not solve anything anyway since the site would never reverse a roll to begin with even if it were proven to be a fraudulent roll result.

[Chris314]

hello cheers and happy xmas . sorry if i am posting in the wrong place and manner. first of i like to know. what is the formula for sharing amount equally among all referrals? say i have it set at 100%
example - user 1 gives me 300 satoshi. user 2 gives me 30. and user 3 gives 3 satoshi. are those 333 satoshi devided by the number of users 333/3 then each get 111? or is it user 1 gets 300 user 2 30 and user 3 3 satoshi.
and in the second option share amount based on referral activity. how is the activity calculated? again its set at 100%
example - user 1 gives me 100 satoshi from free rolls. user 2 the same amount 100 from playing high low. and user 3 100 from interest? who is considered more active. and how is that split?

There are 3 ways to share referral income with your referrals.
Let's say that you have 4 referrals, ref1 gives you 1000 sats a week (whatever the way, free roll, dice or interests), ref2 gives100 sats a week, ref3 gives 10 sats a week and ref4 isn't active anymore, but already gave you 10000 satoshis the last month.
Your referral commission is 1110 sats a week, and you set a 100% percentage to share.

You have then 3 options :
1) "Share amount equally among all referrals" : the 1110 sats is shared among your 4 referrals, thus giving 1110/4=277 sats each (for the inactive one as well)
2) "Share amount based on total referral activity"  (supposed you have your account for 4 weeks) will look at total contribution for each referral : ref1 gave 4x1000 = 4000, ref2 gave 400, ref3 gave 40 and ref4 gave 10000 (total 14440)
The 1110 will be shared as (4000*1110)/14440 =  307 sats for ref1, (400*1110)/14440 = 30 sats for ref2, (40*1110)/14440=3 sats for ref3 and (10000*1110)/14440=768 sats for ref4
3) "Share amount based on referral activity since last payout" merely looks at this week's contribution and share accordingly, thus giving 1000 sat to ref1, 100 sat to ref2, 10 sat to ref3 and nothing to ref4.

The third solution is the fairest as it shares equally among active referrals.

[goshko_hubaveca]

hmm thanks for the answer. does option 2 take in acount the 3 previous weeks out of 4? or is this calculation made from an agregate of 4 weeks without previous sharing?

[Chris314]

hmm thanks for the answer. does option 2 take in acount the 3 previous weeks out of 4? or is this calculation made from an agregate of 4 weeks without previous sharing?

Option 2 takes all previous weeks since your account exists (TOTAL commission in your referrals details). I used a 4 weeks old account for the example.

[DebitMe]

Has the formula to calculate how much, "bonus"  I get from each free roll been changed recently? I used to be able to make a bet of 0.1 btc and go up by a whole level. Now I only get a few percent. It seems to have been changed when the amount of tickets received for a bet was reduced by half.