Bitcoin Forum
October 21, 2017, 09:09:42 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin OMG! including Watch-Only  (Read 22908 times)
gweedo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Java, PHP, HTML/CSS Programmer for Hire!


View Profile WWW
October 29, 2013, 08:33:02 PM
 #21

Their is an issue on the current 0.8.5 mac version, there was like a menu that would pop up when you right clicked on the dock icon, this was so when it was hidden it would come back.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1522

Now that bug has been reintroduced on this build. Love this build thou! Already used coin control!

http://blog.litecoin.org/2013/10/litecoin-v0852-rc2-release-notes.html
Could you please verify if that bug exists in Litecoin v0.8.5.2-rc2 too?  We copied nearly all the patches from our Litecoin branch, so I'm curious if it needs to be fixed there too.

Can you point me to a mac OSX dmg of the litecoin-qt of that version and I can then verify.

Want to earn 2500 SATOSHIS per hour? Come Chat and Chill in https://goseemybits.com/lobby
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508576982
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576982

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576982
Reply with quote  #2

1508576982
Report to moderator
wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 08:34:07 PM
 #22

Their is an issue on the current 0.8.5 mac version, there was like a menu that would pop up when you right clicked on the dock icon, this was so when it was hidden it would come back.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1522

Now that bug has been reintroduced on this build. Love this build thou! Already used coin control!

http://blog.litecoin.org/2013/10/litecoin-v0852-rc2-release-notes.html
Could you please verify if that bug exists in Litecoin v0.8.5.2-rc2 too?  We copied nearly all the patches from our Litecoin branch, so I'm curious if it needs to be fixed there too.

Can you point me to a mac OSX dmg of the litecoin-qt of that version and I can then verify.

http://download1.rpmfusion.org/~warren/litecoin-0.8.5.2-rc2/
It was linked from that previous URL.  Please use GPG to verify the download.

If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
gweedo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Java, PHP, HTML/CSS Programmer for Hire!


View Profile WWW
October 29, 2013, 09:21:51 PM
 #23

Their is an issue on the current 0.8.5 mac version, there was like a menu that would pop up when you right clicked on the dock icon, this was so when it was hidden it would come back.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1522

Now that bug has been reintroduced on this build. Love this build thou! Already used coin control!

http://blog.litecoin.org/2013/10/litecoin-v0852-rc2-release-notes.html
Could you please verify if that bug exists in Litecoin v0.8.5.2-rc2 too?  We copied nearly all the patches from our Litecoin branch, so I'm curious if it needs to be fixed there too.

Can you point me to a mac OSX dmg of the litecoin-qt of that version and I can then verify.

http://download1.rpmfusion.org/~warren/litecoin-0.8.5.2-rc2/
It was linked from that previous URL.  Please use GPG to verify the download.

I can verify that it does as have the same issue.

Want to earn 2500 SATOSHIS per hour? Come Chat and Chill in https://goseemybits.com/lobby
wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 10:10:52 PM
 #24


http://download1.rpmfusion.org/~warren/litecoin-0.8.5.2-rc2/
It was linked from that previous URL.  Please use GPG to verify the download.

I can verify that it does as have the same issue.

Thanks.  We'll look into fixing this in the next build.  If you can find a patch to fix this it would help us out.  I personally don't have a Mac, and our Mac developer is very busy right now.

If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 10:13:08 PM
 #25

p.s.
Will you pull my gitian sigs if I make some?

I can't speak for Warren, but the general idea with gitian sigs is the more the better. We want lots of people from the community to use gitian - pretty much no matter who you are a gitian sig from you will increase someone's confidence in the build.
ok - I'm on it..

all I can tell you ATM, before going to bed, is that my win32 sigs are different
https://github.com/piotrnar/gitian.sigs.omg/tree/master/0.8.5-OMG1-win32/piotrnar

though I took the HEAD - might that be the problem?
I would not think so, since its the same commit id as the tag: 5b474dacd8ae0d32f8c76dead7b7e9905d868ec3

I rebuilt all deps from scratch and the resulting .exe's came out identical to my previous gitian sigs.  I'm asking others to join gitian build tests to figure out what is going on here.

Update: pooler's gitian sigs were identical to me.  There might be something wrong with your build environment.  Do you get equal sigs for standard Bitcoin giitan sigs?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

0a95da7567d8a9dabeadffe5b74e4813072e4a2c6fc02c130bb383e949c78d22  bitcoin-0.8.5-win32-setup.exe
7b06dc9534b1e12849780be0481c629a8cc9d925ca8849dadc4d593a5d9e4f6f  bitcoin-qt.exe
dfeac5941ea70141d447c1d79c84d8c74c84126c6df49f2b08c6bff34c07a7b6  daemon/bitcoind.exe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)

iQQcBAEBCAAGBQJScDKYAAoJELEXnrc0fcENPF0gAJjvM3LZHSRGKu8iMwKiDYzo
m1/YjN7jtSIwyjhw+ChFAEji07OELTd+zlvVfLTbsm1hHz5e5uu78FyWVTg2AD+7
Xe9pk0viwier3bwI1NM4283MQNZKNjetmR3GPS0BSBYJ1B3A5o2tlbvG7R4vHYXB
IzAlVRsi28AkKTS509lK7G/rnakvptQBbOiGme+jBF0otw+cV48AGzVXEPithe57
HclneNoL6smKyP89GPxTnJZpQ/Yb1YFSIwYoOArZ81TAp8UwFu8BJUQTubqYN2G1
//N6usByKqCgkz9UDSkqlg0KlxF+tvESOmT2jz6Ysgg+Ig/gllN1/zesMdQP5XfW
+fueRwkBHNvsN8ayFj77QTgyVseTDZmGhdlFCykNDV7ChHe7IUJKFEQHLHOAg+aI
4Wuy9K9TA4CNtW3Q8eQaEnKCzKB8GIxamwsIw0ZeLDpTs11YShknj8oO1CqulhgS
9W+Eb+vJeGDpMsB5tk/pwQrDmg54/ivSKCRcOS2Da+E50gWvHWIDqHEcEk7UeWlg
WuPRL/Q/oQ0qHusqzV8Iw6BckobYUlglcz3pYdYIWxri36fG6DwXgYhbmZdgxpRY
HzcAttr99VVGRjq4yRRWDW7L4vnCarP5Zw8CpmPl3TzQbqYznCtDshm5ElNE4i8N
kYKiNKJzd+gw2nnaGdj/mhD9DvjHEJ+vYXTyAkNG2/X35AnQhB4T390WEg/eBJRD
qYjs/GAoxS+7cC4DxZlCJfy4IB1sZsbsowHclrURe+yNOx8ep+w73cp2HdY1U74e
qDNJ255BGG01liznSg58rMYrf7IhwioYMQ9eC5V7NxTld637mSwymmFdTp02Zq6k
8KqiPDW+RRMUNitjtB/VwdvKXzHe7isfyzGVSZrmUHgZeZw0/NLcObddJKWVwnaI
U2jgMWuzL1VTQLUKjc+B6NZjkFHhOgxXgOT8gu1EcMq/RdLV3e+pr7rJBzNYWU6t
Dc9DAksvkiizPzMeZF6nQvdw7TILffYWEtSRHx5m+5uYFgVfTs7Ssdvtm9AZH/ae
N3T0TdRrDevK5Ciqp+P/G+iW1pw7l38QLqiq2aWDywmpUOIq3BJFvepSfoaQR05x
hbofdUGRM9mhDc3O9O6tZGoJPzSqVq93I4dX/dZWR+P6/yR3V+kkgCX+slEJCNGq
I4KtZTJ7QFVWQM33Ox3zBJ5pwghBPkCoZmiT3cxuspKi5DSktyR8ojob3ULcva3p
QrcjFZCebmREjxZRVyyi9IF3qoBvDlfFhJ9kLC2kTkiS8oVlNCutF7M6oWfvx1US
0m7YqfUecJpEu5lGKblQ6XAIdiIjFWon+TBn/K4gzvDHks5Li5wv8qV4t/jMMEU=
=HmNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
knowitnothing
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 10:30:59 PM
 #26

I wouldn't say the build environment is acting wrongly, isn't this just due to the builds not being deterministic ?

If anyone is wondering what I'm talking about, please check https://blog.torproject.org/blog/deterministic-builds-part-one-cyberwar-and-global-compromise or others related.
wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 10:49:30 PM
 #27

I wouldn't say the build environment is acting wrongly, isn't this just due to the builds not being deterministic ?

If anyone is wondering what I'm talking about, please check https://blog.torproject.org/blog/deterministic-builds-part-one-cyberwar-and-global-compromise or others related.

https://github.com/litecoin-project/gitian.sigs.omg
Two people independently built identical binaries.  It is deterministic.

If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
knowitnothing
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 11:16:03 PM
 #28

I wouldn't say the build environment is acting wrongly, isn't this just due to the builds not being deterministic ?

If anyone is wondering what I'm talking about, please check https://blog.torproject.org/blog/deterministic-builds-part-one-cyberwar-and-global-compromise or others related.

https://github.com/litecoin-project/gitian.sigs.omg
Two people independently built identical binaries.  It is deterministic.

It's fine that you are using gitian, but did you check the link I pasted (most likely the part two of that) ? Tor uses gitian too, but that link points out that gitian does not actually guarantee deterministic builds, and two people getting the same binary is not a counter-argument for that. It might be that this package is not affected by the issues pointed there, no matter the platform, but I don't know that.

One of the issues pointed in that link: On Windows builds, something mysterious causes 3 bytes to randomly vary in the binary.

Can you guarantee that this is not the case for this package ?
wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 11:38:01 PM
 #29

I wouldn't say the build environment is acting wrongly, isn't this just due to the builds not being deterministic ?

If anyone is wondering what I'm talking about, please check https://blog.torproject.org/blog/deterministic-builds-part-one-cyberwar-and-global-compromise or others related.

https://github.com/litecoin-project/gitian.sigs.omg
Two people independently built identical binaries.  It is deterministic.

It's fine that you are using gitian, but did you check the link I pasted (most likely the part two of that) ? Tor uses gitian too, but that link points out that gitian does not actually guarantee deterministic builds, and two people getting the same binary is not a counter-argument for that. It might be that this package is not affected by the issues pointed there, no matter the platform, but I don't know that.

One of the issues pointed in that link: On Windows builds, something mysterious causes 3 bytes to randomly vary in the binary.

Can you guarantee that this is not the case for this package ?

I make no guarantees about anything.  Identical build results from Gitian suggests that I didn't add anything secretly to this build.  It could also mean it is possible that all builds are equally compromised.  If that's true, then the standard Bitcoin gitian builds are also compromised.

If you get different results than these builds then there is something different about your build environment.  Are you using Gitian kvm or lxc?

If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
gweedo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Java, PHP, HTML/CSS Programmer for Hire!


View Profile WWW
October 29, 2013, 11:50:04 PM
 #30


http://download1.rpmfusion.org/~warren/litecoin-0.8.5.2-rc2/
It was linked from that previous URL.  Please use GPG to verify the download.

I can verify that it does as have the same issue.

Thanks.  We'll look into fixing this in the next build.  If you can find a patch to fix this it would help us out.  I personally don't have a Mac, and our Mac developer is very busy right now.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm

This is the code that needs to be merged into your client, this would allow for a menu when right clicking on the dock icon and choose to hide/show the gui window and has worked really well. Sorry I can't be more help then just pointing out this.

Want to earn 2500 SATOSHIS per hour? Come Chat and Chill in https://goseemybits.com/lobby
wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
October 30, 2013, 01:36:37 AM
 #31

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm

This is the code that needs to be merged into your client, this would allow for a menu when right clicking on the dock icon and choose to hide/show the gui window and has worked really well. Sorry I can't be more help then just pointing out this.

Do you know if BItcoin master currently has this issue for Mac?  I am unable to test Mac.

If we reintroduced this problem by pulling a 0.9 patch, it's possible master has this issue now, or they subsequently fixed it with another patch.

If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
gweedo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Java, PHP, HTML/CSS Programmer for Hire!


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2013, 01:40:58 AM
 #32

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm

This is the code that needs to be merged into your client, this would allow for a menu when right clicking on the dock icon and choose to hide/show the gui window and has worked really well. Sorry I can't be more help then just pointing out this.

Do you know if BItcoin master currently has this issue for Mac?  I am unable to test Mac.

If we reintroduced this problem by pulling a 0.9 patch, it's possible master has this issue now, or they subsequently fixed it with another patch.

No the current master branch doesn't have this issue.

Want to earn 2500 SATOSHIS per hour? Come Chat and Chill in https://goseemybits.com/lobby
wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
October 30, 2013, 02:03:49 AM
 #33

Watch Only introduced some kind of coin selection issue.  It was removed for now until I can figure it out.  The remaining patches are very close to what has been shipping in Litecoin since mid-September.

If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
piotr_n
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


aka tonikt


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2013, 09:52:19 AM
 #34

p.s.
Will you pull my gitian sigs if I make some?

I can't speak for Warren, but the general idea with gitian sigs is the more the better. We want lots of people from the community to use gitian - pretty much no matter who you are a gitian sig from you will increase someone's confidence in the build.
ok - I'm on it..

all I can tell you ATM, before going to bed, is that my win32 sigs are different
https://github.com/piotrnar/gitian.sigs.omg/tree/master/0.8.5-OMG1-win32/piotrnar

though I took the HEAD - might that be the problem?
I would not think so, since its the same commit id as the tag: 5b474dacd8ae0d32f8c76dead7b7e9905d868ec3

I rebuilt all deps from scratch and the resulting .exe's came out identical to my previous gitian sigs.  I'm asking others to join gitian build tests to figure out what is going on here.

Now I see what I did wrong.
I did not set the VERSION var properly (0.8.5 instead of 0.8.5-OMG1) and fetched wrong sources.

Shouldn't be doing it so late and announcing such a message just before going to sleep - my apologies.

I'm redoing it right now.

Check out gocoin - my original project of full bitcoin node & cold wallet written in Go.
PGP fingerprint: AB9E A551 E262 A87A 13BB  9059 1BE7 B545 CDF3 FD0E
piotr_n
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


aka tonikt


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2013, 10:09:54 AM
 #35

Yep, the binaries are all right.
I've also done OMG2: https://github.com/piotrnar/gitian.sigs.omg/tree/master/

Sorry again for messing up.

Check out gocoin - my original project of full bitcoin node & cold wallet written in Go.
PGP fingerprint: AB9E A551 E262 A87A 13BB  9059 1BE7 B545 CDF3 FD0E
Netnox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470



View Profile
October 30, 2013, 11:09:57 AM
 #36

As a LTC dev shouldn't you have to create this for LTC first?

gweedo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Java, PHP, HTML/CSS Programmer for Hire!


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2013, 12:39:36 PM
 #37

As a LTC dev shouldn't you have to create this for LTC first?

He did, basically he took the latest litecoin client and made it a bitcoin client.

Want to earn 2500 SATOSHIS per hour? Come Chat and Chill in https://goseemybits.com/lobby
jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 03:11:00 PM
 #38

Went to check out the Binary downloads and the link in the original post is just showing blank directories for each OS version:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/~warren/bitcoin-0.8.5-OMG3/

Are the binaries going to be available again anytime soon?  Has anyone tested the Node Only/Disabled Wallet functionality with a local P2Pool node?

wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 07:14:23 PM
 #39

Went to check out the Binary downloads and the link in the original post is just showing blank directories for each OS version:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/~warren/bitcoin-0.8.5-OMG3/

Are the binaries going to be available again anytime soon?  Has anyone tested the Node Only/Disabled Wallet functionality with a local P2Pool node?

Oops.  Linux binary copied into the correct folder now.  Mac builds are done by another dev and hopefully will be available today.  I acquired a Macbook to do it myself but need to figure out the build environment.

If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
wtogami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 12:31:33 PM
 #40

Are you one of the rare users who regularly experiences the data corruption with Bitcoin-Qt on Mac?  We need testing of this build which includes two fsync patches and an upgrade to leveldb-1.13.  Does it make the corruption problems go away?  If you still experience corruption with OMG3, please report:

  • MacOS version?
  • Mac hardware?
  • Brand/model of hard drive or SSD, especially if you replaced it with an after market drive

http://download1.rpmfusion.org/~warren/bitcoin-0.8.5-OMG3/macosx/
Binary download, please verify the GPG signature.

https://github.com/litecoin-project/bitcoinomg/commits/bitcoin-omg-0.8
Source


If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC:  1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3      LTC:  LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!