FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest

[STT]

Did you post from a phone, its got garbled.     You can come back and edit the mistakes out btw.     After a line of text press return twice and we can have a much easier time of reading what you wrote.

New paragraph or a space in sentences helps people stay with points you make in the post.    Just imo on this forum layout you will get more readers by splitting up blocks of text.  


 Anyhow I just put some tickets into the lottery but I dont see how it set a max bet for you, theres no button for that but if it was the auto bet function on Multiply then yea I dont do that because I prefer manual bets.   I need time to mourn my losses or celebrate my wins 
I doubt support can reverse the tickets purchase unless it has not proceeded yet.    Whenever I use a phone it activates and selects wrong words continually, its super frustrating so thats my guess of how this happened.

It might be a fair point to have a no gamble balance, savings in settings to avoid this situation

[1713521506]

1713521506

[1713521506]

1713521506

[1713521506]

1713521506

[1713521506]

1713521506

[1713521506]

1713521506

[ESG]

Did you post from a phone, its got garbled.    
 You can come back and edit the mistakes out btw.  

  After a line of text press return twice and
 we can have a much easier time of reading what you wrote

>>>>Thank you for letting me know, STT,

i edit,  and explained more a little

..  ;  p)  !!!))) ,   

but im 

disapointed
for this

[ESG]

___

____

_______ i edited this ,

_____________________ thanks for let me Know

______________________________________________________________________________

 
number  this account is  >>  

freebitco.in/15558869

and I feel very sad to say that
there is no place on the web
where you can trust your btc,

 I wish I could say the opposite, but no.
 freebitco.in, is not a good place
 to you leave your money for earn interest  

>>... 59 X 2 and  2 seconds 12500 sat
 per multiply roll black pot activeted,
but it was not me who activated ,
.. its a bug for stealing my btc  >>
please support, help me!
   https://ibb.co/dPyuFL
 

   

 I think that a good solution
 that should have
 in the site freebitco.in,

 for those who want to leave btc
saved to earn interest,

 should have how to block the games,
or limits of amounts in the daily bets,
only then this site will gain confidence,
because this method of taking our balance,


 it amazes anyone who wants to leave their
btcs saved in freebitco.in

       STT thanks for advice,

 I believe that it would require that the main balance

 be separated from the balance for bets,

 in which the user decides how much and destined for bets,

 so it would not run the risk of losing

the main balance for bugs like this one.


      Good,..
 ...bet on multiply btc, I only use manual bet,

and yes, it may be because of the phone,
 as it was selected max on jackpot amount,
12500 sat, and locked and was tight
 more than 59 times,...

 I believe this was a bug to steal my balance.!!

 I really was very disappointed with the freebitco.in

 after that happened, and I was not disappointed
when I lost much more,
because when I lost I was really betting,

***___But yesterday,
  I was not the one that selected this amount or jackpot 12500sat
  . so I believe that the balance of bets,
  should be separated from the main balance,

 so that the site will gain more confidence
 by avoiding these bugs happen.,

>>> And, yes, I had 0.26 balance and 0.2533 left,
 which is already in my wallet...
 stopped and without gain interest, >>
>>because I lost confidence,

 and I do not believe
 it is possible to gain confidence
 in them again to the point that
 I left btc with them,

unless it was the separate
betting balance as I mentioned.

Thank ,..!!



<<<<<<<Thank you for letting me know, stt.>>>>>>>>

[/quote]

[TheQuin]

Did you post from a phone, its got garbled.     You can come back and edit the mistakes out btw.     After a line of text press return twice and we can have a much easier time of reading what you wrote.

New paragraph or a space in sentences helps people stay with points you make in the post.    Just imo on this forum layout you will get more readers by splitting up blocks of text.  


 Anyhow I just put some tickets into the lottery but I dont see how it set a max bet for you, theres no button for that but if it was the auto bet function on Multiply then yea I dont do that because I prefer manual bets.   I need time to mourn my losses or celebrate my wins 
I doubt support can reverse the tickets purchase unless it has not proceeded yet.    Whenever I use a phone it activates and selects wrong words continually, its super frustrating so thats my guess of how this happened.

It might be a fair point to have a no gamble balance, savings in settings to avoid this situation

Phones also seem to cause a lot of people to click the MAX button above the bet amount or check the 1 BTC Jackpot box and then email support claiming they never really wanted to make that bet. 

[Kakmakr]

Did you post from a phone, its got garbled.     You can come back and edit the mistakes out btw.     After a line of text press return twice and we can have a much easier time of reading what you wrote.

New paragraph or a space in sentences helps people stay with points you make in the post.    Just imo on this forum layout you will get more readers by splitting up blocks of text.  


 Anyhow I just put some tickets into the lottery but I dont see how it set a max bet for you, theres no button for that but if it was the auto bet function on Multiply then yea I dont do that because I prefer manual bets.   I need time to mourn my losses or celebrate my wins  
I doubt support can reverse the tickets purchase unless it has not proceeded yet.    Whenever I use a phone it activates and selects wrong words continually, its super frustrating so thats my guess of how this happened.

It might be a fair point to have a no gamble balance, savings in settings to avoid this situation

Phones also seem to cause a lot of people to click the MAX button above the bet amount or check the 1 BTC Jackpot box and then email support claiming they never really wanted to make that bet.  

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options. <pre configure a percentage for gambling & Lotto>

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users. <failsafe option>  

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.  

[TheQuin]

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options. <pre configure a percentage for gambling & Lotto>

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users. <failsafe option>  

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.  

The other failsafe option is to have another account to keep a separate balance for the interest. As long as you don't use it to claim free rolls as well as your main account we don't mind people doing that.

[Triple_S]

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options. <pre configure a percentage for gambling & Lotto>

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users. <failsafe option>  

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.  

The other failsafe option is to have another account to keep a separate balance for the interest. As long as you don't use it to claim free rolls as well as your main account we don't mind people doing that.

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

[broke_tradah]

Yes lets just encourage people to break the rules,  good idea.  A second account for such absurdity makes no sense at all.  Dude has a valid point,  there really should be a separate interest bearing account on 1 account so as not to give you an excuse to say "O u had 2 accounts, so we emptied them BOTH.  See ya cheater".

[TheQuin]

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options. <pre configure a percentage for gambling & Lotto>

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users. <failsafe option>  

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.  

The other failsafe option is to have another account to keep a separate balance for the interest. As long as you don't use it to claim free rolls as well as your main account we don't mind people doing that.

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

[Kakmakr]

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options. <pre configure a percentage for gambling & Lotto>

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users. <failsafe option>  

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.  

The other failsafe option is to have another account to keep a separate balance for the interest. As long as you don't use it to claim free rolls as well as your main account we don't mind people doing that.

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

The problem is, this second account might be flagged erroneously and you might end up losing your income generating account. I would not have to risk that, if I could just configure a percentage of my total balance for a specific purpose. That should not be too difficult to code?

This could be seen as a "budget" tool for beginners and you can give people the option to turn this on or off. <Like the options under the referral section for the distribution of the rewards> 

[Thirdspace]

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

so... how about those wagering and referral contest winners?
some of them are suspiciously looked like they referred their own account to get both prizes
the connected accounts in question, both are having the same total wager amounts

[jackg]

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

so... how about those wagering and referral contest winners?
some of them are suspiciously looked like they referred their own account to get both prizes
the connected accounts in question, both are having the same total wager amounts

YEs but they want to wager highly.... TheQuin and wetsut aren't going to block them are they if they want to waste (i mean gamble) with their money on this site... IF they do, those users might go and find a casino with a more reasonable house edge .

[TheQuin]

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

so... how about those wagering and referral contest winners?
some of them are suspiciously looked like they referred their own account to get both prizes
the connected accounts in question, both are having the same total wager amounts

The fact that an account only has one referral that wagers doesn't make it suspicious. These accounts certainly didn't do it to abuse the wagering contest as they are much older than the competition.

[broke_tradah]

The fact that an account only has one referral that wagers doesn't make it suspicious. These accounts certainly didn't do it to abuse the wagering contest as they are much older than the competition.

LMFAO.  More lies.  Dude doesnt realize he f'd up when he suggested using 2 accounts to recreate a feature that really should exist already but does not because this shithole enjoys stealing people's BTC due to mistakes and other non-sense of the sort.  He also fails to mention that if someone wins and they used their own referral,  it opens the door for them to conveniently say "opps,  to bad,  you still lose because you abused the referral system".  But the fact that they havent done that yet just goes to prove that these people are not winning in the first place anyway.

[TheQuin]

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

so... how about those wagering and referral contest winners?
some of them are suspiciously looked like they referred their own account to get both prizes
the connected accounts in question, both are having the same total wager amounts

YEs but they want to wager highly.... TheQuin and wetsut aren't going to block them are they if they want to waste (i mean gamble) with their money on this site... IF they do, those users might go and find a casino with a more reasonable house edge .

Fortunately, most customers don't look at an isolated figure but take into account the overall package and they see that we are very competitive with the plain low edge sites. Judging by the volume of business we do compared to them our approach is very popular.
You are right that we aren't going looking for small cases of abuse like that. We're far too busy dealing with people with hundreds or thousands of accounts.

BTW. I like the new avatar.

[broke_tradah]

You are right that we aren't going looking for small cases of abuse like that.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight,  more snakeoil lies.  "Small cases of abuse" is it.  What about the LEGIT referrers getting snubbed out by these assclowns who are losing their ass and being listed as "winners" in the wager "contest" which should actually be relabeled to "Biggest losers contest".  You see people, there is a reason for this.  If the idiots at the top actually WIN,  they'll still lose because they get their account EMPTIED due to "referral cheating".  But if they lose,  nothing happens (to either of their accounts).  In BOTH cases,  REAL referrers are NOT paid what they should be because they were edged out by the cheating mofos.  So for wetback and thequack,  it's a winwin because paying REAL referrers costs more than it does to pay someone whos gambling.  Dont let this assclown sweet talk you into making 2 accounts.  All it does is give them an opportunity to rape you even easier than otherwise (as if its not easy enough as it is).  So the problem with the Lottery simply moved from the Lottery to the "Wagering Contest" and never actually disappeared as these idiots would like you to think.  It's still there and very alive.

[jackg]

Fortunately, most customers don't look at an isolated figure but take into account the overall package and they see that we are very competitive with the plain low edge sites. Judging by the volume of business we do compared to them our approach is very popular.
You are right that we aren't going looking for small cases of abuse like that. We're far too busy dealing with people with hundreds or thousands of accounts.

BTW. I like the new avatar.

Yeah, I’m going to be more biased towards hating the site since I can’t get in it anymore (Janet blocks everything, even medical data mining servers get blocked)...

Also thanks, so do I credits to MadZ for it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174480.

[docthusinh]

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options. <pre configure a percentage for gambling & Lotto>

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users. <failsafe option>  

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.  

The other failsafe option is to have another account to keep a separate balance for the interest. As long as you don't use it to claim free rolls as well as your main account we don't mind people doing that.

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

Please be clear what is and isn't abuse, specific to the following case:
Case 1: User A create 1 main account and another 10 accounts refering himself. Deposit into all of these 11 accounts, play multiply on all accounts get RPs Claim free BTC (Not taking into account overall profit/loss). A specific purpose just to gambling against your site.
Case 2: User B create only 1 account, referring different 10 accounts. User B does not deposit a single satoshi, just play for free and get referrals, other 10 accounts selfdom play, some are depositing and may profit/loss.

[TheQuin]

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options. <pre configure a percentage for gambling & Lotto>

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users. <failsafe option>  

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.  

The other failsafe option is to have another account to keep a separate balance for the interest. As long as you don't use it to claim free rolls as well as your main account we don't mind people doing that.

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

Please be clear what is and isn't abuse, specific to the following case:
Case 1: User A create 1 main account and another 10 accounts refering himself. Deposit into all of these 11 accounts, play multiply on all accounts get RPs Claim free BTC (Not taking into account overall profit/loss). A specific purpose just to gambling against your site.
Case 2: User B create only 1 account, referring different 10 accounts. User B does not deposit a single satoshi, just play for free and get referrals, other 10 accounts selfdom play, some are depositing and may profit/loss.

I already have been clear that referring yourself is an abuse of the referral system. It is there to reward you for bringing in new customers not to make referral commissions from yourself. So both of your examples are abusive.

[docthusinh]

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options. <pre configure a percentage for gambling & Lotto>

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users. <failsafe option>  

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.  

The other failsafe option is to have another account to keep a separate balance for the interest. As long as you don't use it to claim free rolls as well as your main account we don't mind people doing that.

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

Please be clear what is and isn't abuse, specific to the following case:
Case 1: User A create 1 main account and another 10 accounts refering himself. Deposit into all of these 11 accounts, play multiply on all accounts get RPs Claim free BTC (Not taking into account overall profit/loss). A specific purpose just to gambling against your site.
Case 2: User B create only 1 account, referring different 10 accounts. User B does not deposit a single satoshi, just play for free and get referrals, other 10 accounts selfdom play, some are depositing and may profit/loss.

I already have been clear that referring yourself is an abuse of the referral system. It is there to reward you for bringing in new customers not to make referral commissions from yourself. So both of your examples are abusive.

I mean for case 2 is another 10 new users, so let say it is a Non abusive.

Bringing new customers which are potentially gamblers that bring profit to you. Abuse of the referral system, yes, but 50% correct. Another 50% can proof that someoone with an insanse bot algo + enough bank roll can shut the shop down to bankruptcy. i.e:

1. With a 10 BTC bankroll, split into 10 accounts and User A kick of the betting bot (which is not abusive as declared in your previous posts). As soon as one of the account get REKTED, his earning from another 9 accounts can be used to backup the other to beat the losing streak, and repeat again. What if all these accounts do not claim hourly FREE BTC but gets what it risked for (betting) to get the Reward Points/ exchange BTC + earned profit from betting? I guess it will be "abusive" answer. So, is this a case where you are scared of?

2. Same as above strategy but this time assume 10 of the closed/best friends/trusted with the referer is the team leader which is User A, collectively join the bankroll of 10 BTC (1BTC each and lending/borrowing/transfer back and forth) to bet against your site, all the BTC transfer around on the blockchain itself to gather up as long as a member need it, when he get a losing streak event. Will all of the friends get banned and get marked as abusive of the system? I guess it should be "abusive" "sometime/anytime" since your site is having a risk of losing against gamblers. If it is a non-abusive, then what are the reason why (1) is abusive and (2) is not abusive, since your potential income is 10BTC each case? Assume that both cases the referer will never get any more user into the system (no more level 2 user).