🔷 Waves Tech - a powerful blockchain-agnostic ecosystem

[gribble]

​​AngelHack's Global Hackathon Series 2018 in Hong Kong is coming!

Don’t miss two cool challenges brought to you by Waves Developer Advocate Inal Kardanov: Betting on the blockchain and Escrow for ICOs. The prize money for each challenge is 500 WAVES.
Don’t delay, register now at https://www.eventbrite.com/e/angelhack-hong-kong-hackathon-2018-tickets-44974716588

Why Waves is the best blockchain solution for airdrops and how to conduct airdrops on waves platform.
http://telegra.ph/How-to-Conduct-Your-Airdrop-Using-Waves-07-06

[MrKubeem]

I've just created a new Waves wallet with the new beta wavesplatform and I've remained quite speechless as I didn't find a single smoothless way to copy my new waves address once inside the platform. Of course by clicking on the "receive" tab I am shown my address, but I have no way to copy it. Instead I am offered a way to "Share the link to an invoice". The only way to extract my waves wallet has been to copy the "Share the link to an invoice" string and extract my address from there. Well, are you totally crazy? How can you hope for mass adoption if you make the easiest things impossible for the average Joe? I know how to go around obstacles, but a newbie won't. As I said, I'm speechless.

[vaporware asset wizard]

https://nxtforum.org/cryptoasset-fund-projects/coinomat-assets/msg216789/#msg216789


Look at the date on Sasha's post ... pathetic,

Deal with this Coinomat asset issue , please!!

[Waves.support]

I've just created a new Waves wallet with the new beta wavesplatform and I've remained quite speechless as I didn't find a single smoothless way to copy my new waves address once inside the platform. Of course by clicking on the "receive" tab I am shown my address, but I have no way to copy it. Instead I am offered a way to "Share the link to an invoice". The only way to extract my waves wallet has been to copy the "Share the link to an invoice" string and extract my address from there. Well, are you totally crazy? How can you hope for mass adoption if you make the easiest things impossible for the average Joe? I know how to go around obstacles, but a newbie won't. As I said, I'm speechless.

Hi MrKubeem!
You can copy the address by clicking the "copy to clipboard" button on the right side of the address.


Best wishes,
Waves Community manager.

[Midas111]

I really love the waves tech its great. It really is. And the social media team is hilarious, real jokers. I expect great things from the waves platform and downright foolishness from their social media crew, hopefully they can beef up the marketing team with some bright guys cause the current crop is just too funny for their own good. lol

[estenity]

wavesgo.com site still inefficient outside of block enumeration ?

[egtrader]

https://nxtforum.org/cryptoasset-fund-projects/coinomat-assets/msg216789/#msg216789


Look at the date on Sasha's post ... pathetic,

Deal with this Coinomat asset issue , please!!

we have a lot of problem come from sasha as waves community member we need to vote to get him out

[TomThumb]

As I said, I'm speechless.

We're all speechless, mate. The only one who isn't is Sasha!

[TomThumb]

Why does the Waves Team only build a new project while focusing on the Waves Platform? Waves Platform has many missing features right now. Waves is already behind the roadmap. Fulfilling the promises given must be the first priority.

It's Sasha's modus operandi: create a cryptocurrency, wait for it to die, move on to the next one. However, in the case of Waves, it seems Sasha has already anticipated its future demise and is bailing early. But all is not lost. If you have $500K, you can load up on some Vostok. MARKETING IS ON!

[Undland]

hawky - Last Thursday at 17:49
@Gizmo i think you need to evaluate the approach yourself if you want that.
Anyway, a scientific conference will never ever evaluate the proposal for bugs, they will just evaluate the scientific value of the proposal. So i would not imagine that we get practically relevant insides from the reviewing process.
alexkof - Last Thursday at 19:06
Hi, have posted some text about recent issues: https://forum.wavesplatform.com/t/relase-0-13-x-issues-postmortem/908
> @Gizmo  We will not be voting feature 8 until it has been audited by a 3rd party
Do you mean audit for code or formula?
Gizmo - Last Thursday at 19:15
The formula mostly yes
hawky - Last Thursday at 20:23
@Gizmo The formula is basically the extension that was already suggested in the original analysis of the NXT algo. Really i don't see your problem with it.
Additionally, this is probably the best tested feature in testnet.

Gismo is from wavesnode.net

[glerant]

hawky - Last Thursday at 17:49
@Gizmo i think you need to evaluate the approach yourself if you want that.
Anyway, a scientific conference will never ever evaluate the proposal for bugs, they will just evaluate the scientific value of the proposal. So i would not imagine that we get practically relevant insides from the reviewing process.
alexkof - Last Thursday at 19:06
Hi, have posted some text about recent issues: https://forum.wavesplatform.com/t/relase-0-13-x-issues-postmortem/908
> @Gizmo  We will not be voting feature 8 until it has been audited by a 3rd party
Do you mean audit for code or formula?
Gizmo - Last Thursday at 19:15
The formula mostly yes
hawky - Last Thursday at 20:23
@Gizmo The formula is basically the extension that was already suggested in the original analysis of the NXT algo. Really i don't see your problem with it.
Additionally, this is probably the best tested feature in testnet.

Gismo is from wavesnode.net

Yes, but, even if the general consensus is that he is misinformed or just being awkward for the sake of it, Waves Activation Protocol is a fair way to vote and nodes are entitled to excersise vote in any way they see fit.

If people don't like the way nodes vote they should vote with their leases and take them elsewhere.

[Undland]

hawky - Last Thursday at 17:49
@Gizmo i think you need to evaluate the approach yourself if you want that.
Anyway, a scientific conference will never ever evaluate the proposal for bugs, they will just evaluate the scientific value of the proposal. So i would not imagine that we get practically relevant insides from the reviewing process.
alexkof - Last Thursday at 19:06
Hi, have posted some text about recent issues: https://forum.wavesplatform.com/t/relase-0-13-x-issues-postmortem/908
> @Gizmo  We will not be voting feature 8 until it has been audited by a 3rd party
Do you mean audit for code or formula?
Gizmo - Last Thursday at 19:15
The formula mostly yes
hawky - Last Thursday at 20:23
@Gizmo The formula is basically the extension that was already suggested in the original analysis of the NXT algo. Really i don't see your problem with it.
Additionally, this is probably the best tested feature in testnet.

Gismo is from wavesnode.net

Yes, but, even if the general consensus is that he is misinformed or just being awkward for the sake of it, Waves Activation Protocol is a fair way to vote and nodes are entitled to excersise vote in any way they see fit.

If people don't like the way nodes vote they should vote with their leases and take them elsewhere.

True, but lessors are lazy and they don't care. I am sure that 50-70% not community active members. But the pools use their stakes in their own interests. Features like LPOS, which based on people's consciousness and prudence doesn't and will not work. This is one of the reason why "asset as a fee" was replaced by  "fee sponsorship".

Repeat again. Now Waves POS working on old NXT consensus algo which gives priority for big pools. It need to be updated to the new algo ASAP. Repairing the broken economy is a priority.

[Midas111]

the pos rate could be moved higher to create more interest in staking, also they could stop censoring devs from some of the best cryptos on waves platform. IT has great potential but if it is run as a club for the dev and his friends, then people will go where they are treated properly. The social media admins are the absolute worst and though its not a big deal, they are stopping people from finding out about great waves coins for petty reasons.

[estenity]

the pos rate could be moved higher to create more interest in staking, also they could stop censoring devs from some of the best cryptos on waves platform. IT has great potential but if it is run as a club for the dev and his friends, then people will go where they are treated properly. The social media admins are the absolute worst and though its not a big deal, they are stopping people from finding out about great waves coins for petty reasons.

please listen to Vitalik:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBcdpTsvDnk

[WalkerIVIV]

https://nxtforum.org/cryptoasset-fund-projects/coinomat-assets/msg216789/#msg216789


Look at the date on Sasha's post ... pathetic,

Deal with this Coinomat asset issue , please!!

we have a lot of problem come from sasha as waves community member we need to vote to get him out

I agree about that sasha was the real reason why waves is not growing a lot. It's surpassed by another platform just like EOS, ADA, and many more. if sasha will always in the team and this platform will die as fast as possible consider there will no demand interested to use the ecosystem. Waves die soon lol

[linkHA]

WAVE has always been a great project, competing with ETH and EOS.
So I hope it wins, even if it's not easy.

[estenity]

citation begins:
I agree about that sasha was the real reason why waves is not growing a lot. It's surpassed by another platform just like EOS, ADA, and many more. if sasha will always in the team and this platform will die as fast as possible consider there will no demand interested to use the ecosystem. Waves die soon lol
[/quote]

@walker you are not logical, we dont live into stratosphere.

in the "real life" it cost money:
-to maintain a bank account
-to change between different fiats
-to make repeated tradings at high speed, practically instantaneous

and the decentralized way is not possible.

all that is realized at a low cost with waves.
could you propose a more interesting location for all this ?
are you addicted to more lunar appeals ?

[GraBitCoin]

This company is shit. Their approach to business is disgusting. Their decentralized exchange is not such. They can easily block any address.

[egtrader]

WAVE has always been a great project, competing with ETH and EOS.
So I hope it wins, even if it's not easy.

i agree waves is more beter than ether and eos we are faster and our fees very low and have fastest decetralized exchange but we must ask our self why most people are useing ethereum not waves we need good marketing team to spread waves and another ceo , sasha is very bad

[Undland]

This company is shit. Their approach to business is disgusting. Their decentralized exchange is not such. They can easily block any address.

So this is FUD. They can't block any addresses. The biggest nodes won't let them do that.

Waves Decentralised Exchange has rank 67 by total 24h vol more than $6 mill.

Full list:

Ethfinex - 65 ($7 mil)
Waves Decentralized Exchange - 67 ($6 mil)
IDEX - 91 ($2.3 mil)
CryptoBridge - 115 ($685k)
OasisDEX - 120 ($554k)
Stellar Decentralized Exchange - 141 ($135k)
OpenLedger DEX - 151 ($95k)
Radar Relay - 168 ($31k)
RuDEX - 182 ($6k)
BarterDEX - 197 ($10)

Bisq - outranked (vol $15k)

Waves DEX is a faster because of offchain matching service. And Waves Lite Wallet with DEX onboard which uses TradingView is the best GUI what I've seen