Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 05:59:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin bank accounts - maybe sooner than we think?  (Read 5752 times)
RoadToHell
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 260
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 04, 2013, 05:14:41 PM
 #41

I don't know how it would be implemented but it is quite possible that private wallet insurance might emerge.
I'll believe it as soon as someone presents a pricing scheme for it that is both affordable and actuarially sound.

Insurance isn't magic pixie dust - doing it correctly means having the ability to accurately calculate the risk of insured losses, and for that risk to be low enough that customers are willing to pay for it (either directly via premiums, or indirectly via opportunity cost).
I agree.  By "how it would be implemented" I was thinking that it will necessarily be bound to the wallet owner following some provable steps of safe keeping.  After all, one of the events that you would want insured is the theft of btc by sweeping into another wallet.  So there would need to be a way to show that the policy holder wasn't just stealing their own money and then putting in a claim.

Sam Spade: We were talking about a lot more money than this.
Kasper Gutman: Yes, sir, we were, but this is genuine coin of the realm. With a dollar of this, you can buy ten dollars of talk.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715450390
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715450390

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715450390
Reply with quote  #2

1715450390
Report to moderator
1715450390
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715450390

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715450390
Reply with quote  #2

1715450390
Report to moderator
toy4lov3rs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 375
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 04, 2013, 05:21:47 PM
 #42

I don't know how it would be implemented but it is quite possible that private wallet insurance might emerge.
I'll believe it as soon as someone presents a pricing scheme for it that is both affordable and actuarially sound.

Insurance isn't magic pixie dust - doing it correctly means having the ability to accurately calculate the risk of insured losses, and for that risk to be low enough that customers are willing to pay for it (either directly via premiums, or indirectly via opportunity cost).
I agree.  By "how it would be implemented" I was thinking that it will necessarily be bound to the wallet owner following some provable steps of safe keeping.  After all, one of the events that you would want insured is the theft of btc by sweeping into another wallet.  So there would need to be a way to show that the policy holder wasn't just stealing their own money and then putting in a claim.


But I assume the bank would have exclusive control of private key. And yes if someone confirm transaction with password+SMS code+yubi key he cant complain it was not him
Kenshin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 04, 2013, 05:26:37 PM
 #43

You would trust your entire Bitcoin safekeeping to China?

Why not? I trust China more than America or Britain. If it wasn't America or Britain. We wouldn't have so many war or economy crisis.
CurbsideProphet
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 04, 2013, 05:32:20 PM
 #44

Why would you centralize something which essence is being decentralized?

I am seeking a patent for water that isn't wet.
Ice?
Technically not water, it's ice.

Technically it is water.  Ice is just one state of water (solid), the others being liquid and gas.

1ProphetnvP8ju2SxxRvVvyzCtTXDgLPJV
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!