[ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)

[chrysophylax]

I'll watch this thread.

Only out of curiosity more than information - as the 'old' thread is still highly active and is still considered the main one.

Silly move opening this thread!

#crysx

[1714007605]

1714007605

[1714007605]

1714007605

[1714007605]

1714007605

[OgNasty]

On pins and needles till tomorrow, whitepaper day . good luck everybody  
keep on hashin

It is a bit exciting. 

[TheHas]

Why a new thread? If it is needed you can close comments to the old thread (assuming you have the permissions). Might be easier than having two separate threads running.

[shiggidy]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

[osamadeep]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

what the guarantee to not happens with you again? developers of coin should the only one that post the ann, anyway thanks for your work.

[BiteByte]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

Good point about the miners as I was just now getting a bit sick of it all. But they will now move here.
The first 10 pages here are now though are going to be why there is this second ANN page  

[hack4love]

they remove sgminer  i cabt find this sgminer-x16r-v0.4.0-windows

[shiggidy]

April 3rd new whitepaper released here: http://ravencoin.org/Ravencoin.pdf

[chrysophylax]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

This still makes no sense.

He hasn't locked the other thread, he hasn't made it public that this is what he is doing and why, he hasn't categorically stated that this is the reason why.

In fact, by doing this, he (and you to a large extent) has made this MORE of a mess than it already is by not doing these things.

#crysx

[chrysophylax]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

what the guarantee to not happens with you again? developers of coin should the only one that post the ann, anyway thanks for your work.

There is no guarantee he can give to that effect.

The threads are only what they are, because of the community and NOT the thread owner.

#crysx

[lee cooper]

why are there no major rewards/developers/etc and issued fairly to instill trust in the network. making Ravencoin will be safer, i'm pretty good with this.

[Under_RVN]

New whitepaper and Road map!!!
https://github.com/RavenProject/Ravencoin/blob/master/roadmap/README.md

http://ravencoin.org/Ravencoin.pdf

Ravencoin is about to change the world!!

[Under_RVN]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

This still makes no sense.

He hasn't locked the other thread, he hasn't made it public that this is what he is doing and why, he hasn't categorically stated that this is the reason why.

In fact, by doing this, he (and you to a large extent) has made this MORE of a mess than it already is by not doing these things.

#crysx

you know what doesn't make sense? building a closed source miner for 6 months built on top of GPL code and then never hiring anyone to rewrite the gpl code and then sitting on your miner, never releasing it. But hey! that's just my opinion man, just like you have yours.

[okamuwf]

New whitepaper and Road map!!!
https://github.com/RavenProject/Ravencoin/blob/master/roadmap/README.md

http://ravencoin.org/Ravencoin.pdf

Ravencoin is about to change the world!!

roadmap needs deadlines...

and about exchanges? payment gateways etc...

[chrysophylax]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

This still makes no sense.

He hasn't locked the other thread, he hasn't made it public that this is what he is doing and why, he hasn't categorically stated that this is the reason why.

In fact, by doing this, he (and you to a large extent) has made this MORE of a mess than it already is by not doing these things.

#crysx

you know what doesn't make sense? building a closed source miner for 6 months built on top of GPL code and then never hiring anyone to rewrite the gpl code and then sitting on your miner, never releasing it. But hey! that's just my opinion man, just like you have yours.

Well ...

That would be true IF it was GPL code you were talking about and NOT closed source private code.

Which has nothing to do with what we are discussing here - and as a newbie profile, I assume was to just poke in the ribs.

So if it was just your 'opinion' then that is baseless and nothing worth dictating to preach. Base it on facts, and I would establish a rapport and conversation about it. Base it on hearsay and fiction like you obviously have, then I will do the same as I have done now and rebutt only to the extent that you are nothing more than bringer of bad tidings, to do divert the real issue here in THIS thread. You want a REAL cheat when it comes what you have described? Go to the spmod thread and see what you have stated in action CURRENTLY.

We have a ccminer fork internally, and DO optimize it, but never release it. That is abiding by the rules of GPL. You should read the license some day, it's enlightening to say the least.

Nice try as an attack, but a dismal fail.

#crysx

[chrysophylax]

New whitepaper and Road map!!!
https://github.com/RavenProject/Ravencoin/blob/master/roadmap/README.md

http://ravencoin.org/Ravencoin.pdf

Ravencoin is about to change the world!!

roadmap needs deadlines...

and about exchanges? payment gateways etc...

That is completely false.

Roadmaps do NOT 'need' deadlines, which is the main reason I have been preaching this fact to the masses for years. Your perception is that it does, nothing more.

The whole crypto industry is working on inconsistent misunderstandings of terms, technologies, and projects, and is unfortunately a detrimental situation for ALL that are in it.

#crysx

[Under_RVN]

New whitepaper and Road map!!!
https://github.com/RavenProject/Ravencoin/blob/master/roadmap/README.md

http://ravencoin.org/Ravencoin.pdf

Ravencoin is about to change the world!!

roadmap needs deadlines...

and about exchanges? payment gateways etc...

I think you have some misunderstandings about what kind of project this is. Its not another alt-coin controlled completely by a core development team. I know it seems trite, but you may gain more perspective about this project by joining the discord server. For instance, Dev team has stated their goal for the asset layer fork is October of 2018. Also they have stated that as a dev team their primary objective is coding the platform. Exchanges and payment gateways are a low priority for the Dev Team, but the community has so far organized listing RVN on Cryptobridge and Barterdex. This project is going to be a bit different than the shitcoins some may be used to that have a 3 month lifespan of A)mine B)lackluster POS implementation/masternode C)exit into obscurity

[Under_RVN]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

This still makes no sense.

He hasn't locked the other thread, he hasn't made it public that this is what he is doing and why, he hasn't categorically stated that this is the reason why.

In fact, by doing this, he (and you to a large extent) has made this MORE of a mess than it already is by not doing these things.

#crysx

you know what doesn't make sense? building a closed source miner for 6 months built on top of GPL code and then never hiring anyone to rewrite the gpl code and then sitting on your miner, never releasing it. But hey! that's just my opinion man, just like you have yours.

Well ...

That would be true IF it was GPL code you were talking about and NOT closed source private code.

Which has nothing to do with what we are discussing here - and as a newbie profile, I assume was to just poke in the ribs.

So if it was just your 'opinion' then that is baseless and nothing worth dictating to preach. Base it on facts, and I would establish a rapport and conversation about it. Base it on hearsay and fiction like you obviously have, then I will do the same as I have done now and rebutt only to the extent that you are nothing more than bringer of bad tidings, to do divert the real issue here in THIS thread. You want a REAL cheat when it comes what you have described? Go to the spmod thread and see what you have stated in action CURRENTLY.

We have a ccminer fork internally, and DO optimize it, but never release it. That is abiding by the rules of GPL. You should read the license some day, it's enlightening to say the least.

Nice try as an attack, but a dismal fail.

#crysx

Well ...

It was just a poke in the ribs.

Likewise, it's just your 'opinion' that opening this thread creates MORE of a mess(subjective) and to ascribe any fault or actions of the previous thread owner to this thread is baseless and nothing worth dictating to preach(in your words).

Best of luck with your internal ccminer fork and CWIgm

Nice try as an attack, but a dismal fail.

#under

[chrysophylax]

A new thread was created because the old thread creator (Kai) decided he wasn't going to maintain it anymore.  He's moving onto new ventures.  So since his account is the only one with access to that announcement, this was the best way forward.  The old announcement now links here.

I will be updating this thread for the future.  At least it's a bit cleaner now since all the miners with issues are over on the old thread

This still makes no sense.

He hasn't locked the other thread, he hasn't made it public that this is what he is doing and why, he hasn't categorically stated that this is the reason why.

In fact, by doing this, he (and you to a large extent) has made this MORE of a mess than it already is by not doing these things.

#crysx

you know what doesn't make sense? building a closed source miner for 6 months built on top of GPL code and then never hiring anyone to rewrite the gpl code and then sitting on your miner, never releasing it. But hey! that's just my opinion man, just like you have yours.

Well ...

That would be true IF it was GPL code you were talking about and NOT closed source private code.

Which has nothing to do with what we are discussing here - and as a newbie profile, I assume was to just poke in the ribs.

So if it was just your 'opinion' then that is baseless and nothing worth dictating to preach. Base it on facts, and I would establish a rapport and conversation about it. Base it on hearsay and fiction like you obviously have, then I will do the same as I have done now and rebutt only to the extent that you are nothing more than bringer of bad tidings, to do divert the real issue here in THIS thread. You want a REAL cheat when it comes what you have described? Go to the spmod thread and see what you have stated in action CURRENTLY.

We have a ccminer fork internally, and DO optimize it, but never release it. That is abiding by the rules of GPL. You should read the license some day, it's enlightening to say the least.

Nice try as an attack, but a dismal fail.

#crysx

Well ...

It was just a poke in the ribs.

Likewise, it's just your 'opinion' that opening this thread creates MORE of a mess(subjective) and to ascribe any fault or actions of the previous thread owner to this thread is baseless and nothing worth dictating to preach(in your words).

Best of luck with your internal ccminer fork and CWIgm

Nice try as an attack, but a dismal fail.

#under

Reminiscent of a user who is on the forums trolling/posting on another profile that is argumentative in every way he can be.

So this is the 'new' profile you intend on using mate? Good one. Shows the gutless means that you decide to take.

In any case, your attack is moot. OUR code is just that, and we can and will do what we want with it. Period! The GPL code is restricted and governed by the licensing, and 'should' be adhered to buy the rules that govern it. It doesn't always happen that way. Why don't you accuse MicroSoft that their OS is based on opensource software and that they are using it internally, but publishing it also. I'm sure that will go down well.

As for the RVN threads. Notice - THREADS! With an 's'. This is the 'mess' that I am talking about. Unlike the use case where a single thread is used by the current owners/developers/users, multiple threads that are used at the same time on the same subject is messy. This not subjective, but factual. It is EASY for the last owner of the thread to have published that post - then lock thread. Explaining that there is a new thread because I have other projects I am working on. Simple.

You on the other hand, seem prefer to have multiple threads on the SAME subject, so good for you. The general populace are those that really shouldn't be misled this way, and need to be directed by the DEV TEAM who control this project, as to which is the correct method and direction the community should or should not take.

#crysx

[lasencja]

Price pump 300 sat to 800 sat when more?