|
maxsolnc
|
 |
December 03, 2013, 03:06:25 PM |
|
And yes, I'll ask developer if 'proof-of-store' can be added now, maybe it is possible.
|
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptrol
|
|
December 03, 2013, 03:21:38 PM |
|
And yes, I'll ask developer if 'proof-of-store' can be added now, maybe it is possible.
Maybe the dev is more interested in an open discussion here, instead of a private conversation with you  Oh, and BTW I am not bashing early adopters (I have profited of being an early adopter of many coins), just stressing that putting most coins on hands of early adopters is not on the coins best interest IMHO. TBH I am not much interested in trading Datacoin but I am really interested to see what can be built on top of it. It seems the OP has great plans (for example personal chains ) and would be great to be able to discuss some of them here (or elsewhere) with him. |
|
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
December 03, 2013, 04:12:08 PM |
|
And yes, I'll ask developer if 'proof-of-store' can be added now, maybe it is possible.
Maybe the dev is more interested in an open discussion here, instead of a private conversation with you Oh, and BTW I am not bashing early adopters (I have profited of being an early adopter of many coins), just stressing that putting most coins on hands of early adopters is not on the coins best interest IMHO. TBH I am not much interested in trading Datacoin but I am really interested to see what can be built on top of it. It seems the OP has great plans (for example personal chains ) and would be great to be able to discuss some of them here (or elsewhere) with him. I meant that I'll ask developer to look at this message - not only private talk  Applications are coming, I'm sure - I have some info about it, but don't want to reveal all just now. Projects developers will release some info themselves soon |
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
|
cryptrol
|
|
December 03, 2013, 04:42:36 PM |
|
What if i modify the data inside a transaction? How do other peers can protect themselves?
Seems something critical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
December 03, 2013, 04:45:47 PM |
|
What if i modify the data inside a transaction? How do other peers can protect themselves?
Seems something critical.
where do you want to modify it? In your local blockchain? |
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
mstfck
Member
 Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
I was hacked. Sorry for any scam that occured.
|
|
December 03, 2013, 04:51:24 PM |
|
When you send the file to the blockchain, it is not an executable, and it won't be. Base64 encoded bits. So no risk at all. After a transaction is sent you can't modify it.
|
I was inactive on this forum and apparently someone got my credentials and used my account in scams.
I have changed the password and I am sorry for any scam that occured.
|
|
|
|
cryptrol
|
|
December 03, 2013, 05:21:54 PM |
|
When you send the file to the blockchain, it is not an executable, and it won't be. Base64 encoded bits. So no risk at all. After a transaction is sent you can't modify it.
I mean, there is no check (that I know of ), on the data so that a malicious node could delete/overwrite/alter the data inside the blocks and seed to other peers that would download the wrong data causing havoc on the blockchain. |
|
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
December 03, 2013, 05:24:41 PM |
|
When you send the file to the blockchain, it is not an executable, and it won't be. Base64 encoded bits. So no risk at all. After a transaction is sent you can't modify it.
I mean, there is no check (that I know of ), on the data so that a malicious node could delete/overwrite/alter the data inside the blocks and seed to other peers that would download the wrong data causing havoc on the blockchain. mstfck answered you just after me - see post above |
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
|
cryptrol
|
|
December 03, 2013, 05:26:35 PM |
|
When you send the file to the blockchain, it is not an executable, and it won't be. Base64 encoded bits. So no risk at all. After a transaction is sent you can't modify it.
I mean, there is no check (that I know of ), on the data so that a malicious node could delete/overwrite/alter the data inside the blocks and seed to other peers that would download the wrong data causing havoc on the blockchain. mstfck answered you just after me - see post above In fact, I quoted his reply. |
|
|
|
|
oocook5u (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
December 04, 2013, 02:49:42 AM |
|
What if i modify the data inside a transaction? How do other peers can protect themselves?
Seems something critical.
Data is signed with TxInput's keys. If you change data transaction's signatures become invalid. It's the same as if you change output address or locktime. No peer would accept tx into mempool with invalid signatures. |
|
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
December 04, 2013, 04:09:29 AM |
|
Thanks, I'll also add this info to FAQs that I'm supporting
|
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
|
Ardolafat
|
|
December 04, 2013, 06:59:29 AM |
|
I just thought, that including virus/malware code(not working) in blockchain can cause antivirus software to block/delete the chains.  Of cousre you can exclude blockchains directory for antivirus, but there should be better solutions for this. |
|
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
December 04, 2013, 07:02:30 AM |
|
I just thought, that including virus/malware code(not working) in blockchain can cause antivirus software to block/delete the chains. Of cousre you can exclude blockchains directory for antivirus, but there should be better solutions for this. If all files are crypted with some key, it will be impossible for antivirus to find it. But if someone posts it here just bziped... hmm, maybe you're right. Anyway, it is not _big_ problem - your wallet will be safe anyway  We cannot make all users to encrypt data, but maybe later it will be implemented on top-level of Datacoin |
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
|
Sharky444
|
|
December 04, 2013, 01:39:00 PM |
|
Any news on the pool? I've stopped mining because of the high difficulty.
|
|
|
|
|
Gontxi
|
|
December 04, 2013, 04:06:40 PM |
|
Are coinwarz.com going to put Datacoin in the list??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris180Z
|
|
December 04, 2013, 06:28:19 PM |
|
Looks like im going to wait until a pool is up for this . Somebody please post in here when one is set up. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sharky444
|
|
December 05, 2013, 12:57:06 PM |
|
I think a new unofficiall DTC thread (with a FAQ etc) from the unofficial DTC team and the guy running datacoin.info would do wonders for DTC promotion. The original dev has only interest in coding DTC, but zero interest in promoting it.
|
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
December 05, 2013, 01:07:14 PM |
|
I think a new unofficiall DTC thread (with a FAQ etc) from the unofficial DTC team and the guy running datacoin.info would do wonders for DTC promotion. The original dev has only interest in coding DTC, but zero interest in promoting it.
Agree with you. Starting this thread in 5 minutes |
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
|
jungle_dave
|
|
December 05, 2013, 01:42:55 PM |
|
Been mining for a couple of days but only got 1 block and 3 orphans.
Whats funny is that my smallest rig hashing 0.52 chains per day found the valid block.
My bigger rig (16 core) is finding nothing after 2 days.
"blocks" : 87194,
"chainspermin" : 25,
"chainsperday" : 2.68485530,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 9.69136578,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"primespersec" : 5099,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"sieveextensions" : 9,
"sievepercentage" : 10,
"sievesize" : 1000000,
"testnet" : false
Am I doing something wrong or just unlucky ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
