Nexybit Signature Campaign (Sr/Hero signature revised 4/13)(4/10 rates revised)

[dupee419]

Name: dupee419
Rank: Sr. Member
Bitcoin Address: 3ABTLdDnMzurw2PwnB3xc2VaA8Akvqcrum
Profile UID: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=141742;sa=summary

[1715031134]

1715031134

[1715031134]

1715031134

[adpinbr]

Name: adpinbr
Rank: Sr. Member
Bitcoin Address: 3PJHZA81GJWN8sbdQ96H61SFyfcBoCrK1h
Profile UID: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=104543;sa=summary

[nexybit]

I already post my name rank and the profile on the thread then how I know that my post will count.??

We are currently creating a spreadsheet which will be updated daily(except for Saturdays and Sundays).
The link will be added as soon as we are through.
There you may check your post count, daily post percentage, and expected payout.
We are sorry it is taking longer than we expected and promised.

[nexybit]

We have added a link to our campaign spreadsheet in the OP.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QBT5ciPaphI8ktqhCYGs9RL0ZRorHJKEkotQ0EdHXQE/edit?usp=sharing
Please check and see if your bitcoin address is correct.

Also, those who have not changed their signature but wish to participate, please do till next Monday. You must message us about the change or else your posts cannot be counted.

Thank you.

[Sellingaccs]

We have added a link to our campaign spreadsheet in the OP.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QBT5ciPaphI8ktqhCYGs9RL0ZRorHJKEkotQ0EdHXQE/edit?usp=sharing
Please check and see if your bitcoin address is correct.

Also, those who have not changed their signature but wish to participate, please do till next Monday. You must message us about the change or else your posts cannot be counted.

Thank you.

It seems to me that you have accepted alot of people, whom only post in bounty campaigns and have a low post quality (without any kind of contribution).
It's not too late too turn around and hire someone who is experienced on this forum to manage this campaign. I've seen many services get their reputation ruined because of horrible campaign managers who accept spammers into their campaigns. DT members are not known to like such behavior.

It's your reputation, and i just wanted to know what you might be facing here.

[21coin]

It seems to me that you have accepted alot of people, whom only post in bounty campaigns and have a low post quality (without any kind of contribution).
It's not too late too turn around and hire someone who is experienced on this forum to manage this campaign. I've seen many services get their reputation ruined because of horrible campaign managers who accept spammers into their campaigns. DT members are not known to like such behavior.

It's your reputation, and i just wanted to know what you might be facing here.

I don't see any member who seems be outright spammy . And if they were, they didn't have any sig attached to them before(because no campaign accepts spammy users now anyway) hence making the point moot("spam" posts without sig are not considered bad in the community).

AFAIK they guy's managing the camp. seems to be trying to save as much as he can(hence the low sig rates), so why would he waste another 100 bucks or so per week to let an experienced sig manager run it? And as for DT member potentially negging the campaign, I haven't seen anyone except Yobit being negged for "running a spam signature campaign" and that too was because the spam was in way too big a scale.

@nexybit, although I know you're trying to save on the costs "Posts that have less than 100 words will not be counted." is way too strict a requirement for a low paying campaign. 100 chars should be better here.

P.S: Am I the only one seeing that the sig is still kinda off?

[Sellingaccs]

It seems to me that you have accepted alot of people, whom only post in bounty campaigns and have a low post quality (without any kind of contribution).
It's not too late too turn around and hire someone who is experienced on this forum to manage this campaign. I've seen many services get their reputation ruined because of horrible campaign managers who accept spammers into their campaigns. DT members are not known to like such behavior.

It's your reputation, and i just wanted to know what you might be facing here.

I don't see any member who seems be outright spammy . And if they were, they didn't have any sig attached to them before(because no campaign accepts spammy users now anyway) hence making the point moot("spam" posts without sig are not considered bad in the community).

Well if this user (whom got accepted) is not spamming and shitposting, i don't know who is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1178512;sa=showPosts

Archive: https://archive.fo/RHmkS

Some responsible manager (like yahoo or aTriz) would never accept such a poster into their campaign, and probably add them to their blacklist. This user is just an example of a poster who has made 0 contribution to the forum, and gets encouraged to spam even more because of getting paid for it.


This is the reason why merit system exists nowadays.

Edit: I have nothing against users participating in such things as long as they have shown some kind of contribution.

[21coin]

Well if this user (whom got accepted) is not spamming and shitposting, i don't know who is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1178512;sa=showPosts

Archive: https://archive.fo/RHmkS

Some responsible manager (like yahoo or aTriz) would never accept such a poster into their campaign, and probably add them to their blacklist. This user is just an example of a poster who has made 0 contribution to the forum, and gets encouraged to spam even more because of getting paid for it.

See my second point, i.e if a person is making "spam" posts and not getting paid for it(seeing as he wasn't accepted in the last sig camp he applied to) , its not counted as (sig)"spam". And well if he keeps posting in bounty, according to the rules he just won't be paid.

As for mentioning merit, its a system meant to keep spammy users from ranking up and is only adopted by some sig campaigns the same way Trust points are adopted.

[TianaStam]

The payment that you offer is really little for such kind of rules that you set for participants. My weekly payment is going to be like 2$ per 35 comments! Maybe for poor countries it's money, but for here it's nothing. I hope you will raise payment rates for every rank and Members will take at least 10$ per week.

[Sellingaccs]

See my second point, i.e if a person is making "spam" posts and not getting paid for it(seeing as he wasn't accepted in the last sig camp he applied to) , its not counted as (sig)"spam". And well if he keeps posting in bounty, according to the rules he just won't be paid.

I disagree with you. First of all spam is still spam, even if you don't get paid for it. While "spam" is subjective, most of the people recognize difference between useless data/info, or useful data/info. Accepting users to a campaign, even though you do not know your own rules (or try to actually fuck people over) is at least shady. They can just tell the user "Well we will not pay you as your every post is on these kind of threads", so they can just get free advertisement by method. Accepted users might think that they get paid, which encourages them to write more trash.

[nexybit]

It seems to me that you have accepted alot of people, whom only post in bounty campaigns and have a low post quality (without any kind of contribution).
It's not too late too turn around and hire someone who is experienced on this forum to manage this campaign. I've seen many services get their reputation ruined because of horrible campaign managers who accept spammers into their campaigns. DT members are not known to like such behavior.

It's your reputation, and i just wanted to know what you might be facing here.

I don't see any member who seems be outright spammy . And if they were, they didn't have any sig attached to them before(because no campaign accepts spammy users now anyway) hence making the point moot("spam" posts without sig are not considered bad in the community).

AFAIK they guy's managing the camp. seems to be trying to save as much as he can(hence the low sig rates), so why would he waste another 100 bucks or so per week to let an experienced sig manager run it? And as for DT member potentially negging the campaign, I haven't seen anyone except Yobit being negged for "running a spam signature campaign" and that too was because the spam was in way too big a scale.

@nexybit, although I know you're trying to save on the costs "Posts that have less than 100 words will not be counted." is way too strict a requirement for a low paying campaign. 100 chars should be better here.

P.S: Am I the only one seeing that the sig is still kinda off?

Thank you for your advice on the post word count. We agree that it is too strict and have decided to strike that part out.

[nexybit]

The payment that you offer is really little for such kind of rules that you set for participants. My weekly payment is going to be like 2$ per 35 comments! Maybe for poor countries it's money, but for here it's nothing. I hope you will raise payment rates for every rank and Members will take at least 10$ per week.

We are sorry you are not happy with our current rates. We will be discussing a way to increase the rates for participants in a way that benefits all parties concerned. We wish to continue our signature campaign for a lot longer than a few weeks. However, in order to do so, we cannot promise rates that will be hard to keep in the long run but we also want to keep our participants satisfied as well. We will bring this up in our next meeting and hope to come back to you with a solution. Thank you for voicing your opinion.

[nexybit]

We have sent all the payments for last week's campaign participants except for one person.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QBT5ciPaphI8ktqhCYGs9RL0ZRorHJKEkotQ0EdHXQE/edit#gid=0
You may check your status and rates there. If there has been any mistake, please let us know.

@TianaStam We were unable to send your payment because the number of your posts were so few that your pay was too low to send. We shall add what was not sent to your next payment.

Thank you all for your participation and we hope to continue working with you for a long time.

[21coin]

Uh why exactly was Rossy Akbar paid 0.0036 BTC (and twice too from what I see)? His rates come up as 0.0006 instead of 0.00006 on top of that too

[Alalex]

Thank you sir, payment I have received ..

Is there no additional bonus sir, because the payment is too low 5000% lower than my payment in signature campaign I ever follow.

[nexybit]

Uh why exactly was Rossy Akbar paid 0.0036 BTC (and twice too from what I see)? His rates come up as 0.0006 instead of 0.00006 on top of that too

As it was our first week, we had made a mistake when creating our spreadsheet and when sending the payments.

[nexybit]

When coming to our payment, it turned out that we mistakenly sent the payments out twice. We will deduct that same amount from next week's payment from those whom we've sent twice. We apologize for any confusion this has caused.

Also, starting from this week on, the applying rates will be increased to
Legendary/Hero: 0.00008
Senior: 0.00006
Full: 0.00004
Member: 0.00001

Thank you.

[Alalex]

Sorry sir ..
Looks like I can not follow in your campaign, because the rate you give is still low.
If this campaign is able to pay 0,0001 per post for member rankings, then I would like to rejoin this signature campaign.

[passwordnow]

Name: passwordnow
Rank: Hero member
Bitcoin Address: 1P7anVSt9CQvNCQEbCnLVvRu5Dknjjnobe
Profile UID:  803429

[nexybit]

Sorry sir ..
Looks like I can not follow in your campaign, because the rate you give is still low.
If this campaign is able to pay 0,0001 per post for member rankings, then I would like to rejoin this signature campaign.

We are sorry to see you leave. However, it would be quite impossible for us to pay 0.0001 per post for member rankings. We thank you for your work till now and wish you luck in your endeavors.