🔥[ANN][ICO] Extrabit - Crypto Mining Future🔥

[zevl194]

In my opinion such coincidence isn't surprising at all as such words as "extra" and "bit" meet very often in the sphere of cryptocurrencies. I didn't begin to do hasty conclusions.

We are not talking about names here, it's same company, because they share the same Company number 10929612 and address
here is the information about extrabit.biz in this link and here is the link to certificate of incorporation that belongs to extrabit.io here
=> same company number 10929612 + same address ( 35 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London, United Kingdom, N3 1XW ).

This should really be clarified by the dev and the team so that people's mind would be clear. This is not a coincidence because of they have the same data and probably problem like this should be fixed as soon as possible.

And what we have as a result? Fake project? It would be desirable to receive a detailed explanation from a razabotchik to settle all conflicts.

[1713278603]

1713278603

[1713278603]

1713278603

[1713278603]

1713278603

[1713278603]

1713278603

[1713278603]

1713278603

[SlimShadyMmp]

In my opinion such coincidence isn't surprising at all as such words as "extra" and "bit" meet very often in the sphere of cryptocurrencies. I didn't begin to do hasty conclusions.

We are not talking about names here, it's same company, because they share the same Company number 10929612 and address
here is the information about extrabit.biz in this link and here is the link to certificate of incorporation that belongs to extrabit.io here
=> same company number 10929612 + same address ( 35 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London, United Kingdom, N3 1XW ).

This should really be clarified by the dev and the team so that people's mind would be clear. This is not a coincidence because of they have the same data and probably problem like this should be fixed as soon as possible.

From the looks of things its actually thesame thing but let hope they clear things out or maybe change of project or better determinations

[Dejech19]

Interesting project & idea. I think mining in this project is very good and interesting. I am sure many people will invest in this project and can make good profits. I'm excited about this project. Project will be success

With the idea of having mining for cryptocurrency that will be an energy efficient than the current mining using hardware that will cost you a lot of money. This can really attract people as this can change everything for the traditional way of mining.

I agree, I think its too early  to judge Extrabit  and call it a scam.Yes I know, I cant blame you to think that way no one can say whats the future  for each  project, but lets give them a chance  to grow and show us what  they really have. Mining  is one of most profitable form of crypto  investment. A long term investment  that  can be good for both  parties.

[sathvik112]

Interesting project & idea. I think mining in this project is very good and interesting. I am sure many people will invest in this project and can make good profits. I'm excited about this project. Project will be success

With the idea of having mining for cryptocurrency that will be an energy efficient than the current mining using hardware that will cost you a lot of money. This can really attract people as this can change everything for the traditional way of mining.

I agree, I think its too early  to judge Extrabit  and call it a scam.Yes I know, I cant blame you to think that way no one can say whats the future  for each  project, but lets give them a chance  to grow and show us what  they really have. Mining  is one of most profitable form of crypto  investment. A long term investment  that  can be good for both  parties.

We do not require to jump on judging on basing the whitepapers, it is all the potential that will lead to a greater outcome and at the end point if it is not leading in an expected manner as per their white papers that will turn all the trustees take a right decision.

[bixbem90]

In my opinion such coincidence isn't surprising at all as such words as "extra" and "bit" meet very often in the sphere of cryptocurrencies. I didn't begin to do hasty conclusions.

We are not talking about names here, it's same company, because they share the same Company number 10929612 and address
here is the information about extrabit.biz in this link and here is the link to certificate of incorporation that belongs to extrabit.io here
=> same company number 10929612 + same address ( 35 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London, United Kingdom, N3 1XW ).

This should really be clarified by the dev and the team so that people's mind would be clear. This is not a coincidence because of they have the same data and probably problem like this should be fixed as soon as possible.

From the looks of things its actually thesame thing but let hope they clear things out or maybe change of project or better determinations

Well, someone catch the point. This maybe have bad effects to investor and support now about this domain. I really hope don't have any relations about 2 websites.

[tedmorning]

Great and Interesting Project

[vivavivu]

In my opinion such coincidence isn't surprising at all as such words as "extra" and "bit" meet very often in the sphere of cryptocurrencies. I didn't begin to do hasty conclusions.

We are not talking about names here, it's same company, because they share the same Company number 10929612 and address
here is the information about extrabit.biz in this link and here is the link to certificate of incorporation that belongs to extrabit.io here
=> same company number 10929612 + same address ( 35 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London, United Kingdom, N3 1XW ).

This should really be clarified by the dev and the team so that people's mind would be clear. This is not a coincidence because of they have the same data and probably problem like this should be fixed as soon as possible.

And what we have as a result? Fake project? It would be desirable to receive a detailed explanation from a razabotchik to settle all conflicts.

This action is so harmful to reputation of Extrabit for running their crowdsale. I hope the team will have soon clarification.

[LoverlyRomeos]

In my opinion such coincidence isn't surprising at all as such words as "extra" and "bit" meet very often in the sphere of cryptocurrencies. I didn't begin to do hasty conclusions.

We are not talking about names here, it's same company, because they share the same Company number 10929612 and address
here is the information about extrabit.biz in this link and here is the link to certificate of incorporation that belongs to extrabit.io here
=> same company number 10929612 + same address ( 35 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London, United Kingdom, N3 1XW ).

This should really be clarified by the dev and the team so that people's mind would be clear. This is not a coincidence because of they have the same data and probably problem like this should be fixed as soon as possible.

And what we have as a result? Fake project? It would be desirable to receive a detailed explanation from a razabotchik to settle all conflicts.

This action is so harmful to reputation of Extrabit for running their crowdsale. I hope the team will have soon clarification.

It is required to allocated some time for Extrabit teams to analyse the failure reports, track check list and understand after identifying they may get back with accountability.

[Jedie22]

Great and Interesting Project

You're right, each of us here want a good and prestigious outcome of this project. As this project is still new we must ask further informations about the quality of this project on how it really relevant to the crypto currency community in terms of it's features, advocacy as well as their innovative platforms that can be attractive to those investors. I hope the team can manage well this challenging project as it talks about crypto mining in the future possible outcome.

[MikesLeo]

In my opinion such coincidence isn't surprising at all as such words as "extra" and "bit" meet very often in the sphere of cryptocurrencies. I didn't begin to do hasty conclusions.

We are not talking about names here, it's same company, because they share the same Company number 10929612 and address
here is the information about extrabit.biz in this link and here is the link to certificate of incorporation that belongs to extrabit.io here
=> same company number 10929612 + same address ( 35 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London, United Kingdom, N3 1XW ).

This should really be clarified by the dev and the team so that people's mind would be clear. This is not a coincidence because of they have the same data and probably problem like this should be fixed as soon as possible.

And what we have as a result? Fake project? It would be desirable to receive a detailed explanation from a razabotchik to settle all conflicts.

This action is so harmful to reputation of Extrabit for running their crowdsale. I hope the team will have soon clarification.

They have set some goals and targets to reach them they are dedicatedly working with the advisors to implement the changes and drive through success in every area to not break the trust of any investor of Extrabit.

[Doctor-Coin]

without telling the people where they do their mining, I think it will be not possible to attract many potential investors for their project. Investors wants transparency and they want to know where do they mine...

I check their company, there is a registered company in England  called EXTRABIT LTD under 10929612 for MACK Deacon.
But , I noticed this remark, I don't know what exactly it means, but it seems like they have problem that caused the director's address on the IN01 from the public register.

This is again a great research from you, but the thing is they want to mine somewhere in middle east! Can you imagine this ? Which part of the middle is now a days suitable for mining by very high temperatures? And why do they not tell us the exact place of mining ?

I got interesting info, the original company has website with this domain name extrabit.biz, as you notice it's the same Company number 10929612



and after I did some research, I found this info about extrabit.biz in this link
and by comparing those info to current info about extrabit.io , it's the same company, link to certificate of incorporation here

So, extrabit.biz was High-yield investment program and it ended up scam  and now they are doing ICO with extrabit.io

I do not know if they are connected to the site? Are they only the same on the name right? Is there any response from the team about this issue.

Admin is generally not responsive. But if this information is true, so they will keep quite and try to raise as much as they can and we will never hear about them in the future anymore - same procedure by every scam ICO

[wledgewil]

without telling the people where they do their mining, I think it will be not possible to attract many potential investors for their project. Investors wants transparency and they want to know where do they mine...

I check their company, there is a registered company in England  called EXTRABIT LTD under 10929612 for MACK Deacon.
But , I noticed this remark, I don't know what exactly it means, but it seems like they have problem that caused the director's address on the IN01 from the public register.

This is again a great research from you, but the thing is they want to mine somewhere in middle east! Can you imagine this ? Which part of the middle is now a days suitable for mining by very high temperatures? And why do they not tell us the exact place of mining ?

I got interesting info, the original company has website with this domain name extrabit.biz, as you notice it's the same Company number 10929612



and after I did some research, I found this info about extrabit.biz in this link
and by comparing those info to current info about extrabit.io , it's the same company, link to certificate of incorporation here

So, extrabit.biz was High-yield investment program and it ended up scam  and now they are doing ICO with extrabit.io

I do not know if they are connected to the site? Are they only the same on the name right? Is there any response from the team about this issue.

Admin is generally not responsive. But if this information is true, so they will keep quite and try to raise as much as they can and we will never hear about them in the future anymore - same procedure by every scam ICO

Why to immediately jump on making statements as Scam? If there was priorities they have to fix those priority and major issues which may stop the entire operations. So it is better to give then some time.

[skybot13x]

the project involves holding the company's bounty - how do the developers intend to tell about themselves and their business to the world?

Lets watch and see how they plan to do the advertising and marketing of this project. They should really make a bounty campaign to increase its popularity and attract many investors.

of course it's a pity that the development team has not yet launched a campaign of generosity. I'm sure a lot of people would like to take part in this. Plus, it's a great advertisement for the project.

I do not just repeat that a good marketing company for the project can make a success in the development of the project. But there are teams that decided that it's better to save on advertising, and eventually make a mistake!

When it comes to development a marketing company can do nothing. Coding is the top priority of the core team and we can only hope that they are the best in the industry.

I absolutely agree with you. That's why I'm wondering if the team is an experienced specialist in their field of work? Can anybody tell me if the team had other successful projects before that?

I would assume they assembled a team good enough to cope with the tasks they need to do. If not they need to fill the gaps.

[steampunkz]

without telling the people where they do their mining, I think it will be not possible to attract many potential investors for their project. Investors wants transparency and they want to know where do they mine...

I check their company, there is a registered company in England  called EXTRABIT LTD under 10929612 for MACK Deacon.
But , I noticed this remark, I don't know what exactly it means, but it seems like they have problem that caused the director's address on the IN01 from the public register.

This is again a great research from you, but the thing is they want to mine somewhere in middle east! Can you imagine this ? Which part of the middle is now a days suitable for mining by very high temperatures? And why do they not tell us the exact place of mining ?

I got interesting info, the original company has website with this domain name extrabit.biz, as you notice it's the same Company number 10929612



and after I did some research, I found this info about extrabit.biz in this link
and by comparing those info to current info about extrabit.io , it's the same company, link to certificate of incorporation here

So, extrabit.biz was High-yield investment program and it ended up scam  and now they are doing ICO with extrabit.io

I do not know if they are connected to the site? Are they only the same on the name right? Is there any response from the team about this issue.

Admin is generally not responsive. But if this information is true, so they will keep quite and try to raise as much as they can and we will never hear about them in the future anymore - same procedure by every scam ICO

For now, let us hope the admin and developers will answer all these matters. If they don't, this will result for the investors and supporter to have doubt in investing from this ICO.

[ace09]

without telling the people where they do their mining, I think it will be not possible to attract many potential investors for their project. Investors wants transparency and they want to know where do they mine...

I check their company, there is a registered company in England  called EXTRABIT LTD under 10929612 for MACK Deacon.
But , I noticed this remark, I don't know what exactly it means, but it seems like they have problem that caused the director's address on the IN01 from the public register.

This is again a great research from you, but the thing is they want to mine somewhere in middle east! Can you imagine this ? Which part of the middle is now a days suitable for mining by very high temperatures? And why do they not tell us the exact place of mining ?

I got interesting info, the original company has website with this domain name extrabit.biz, as you notice it's the same Company number 10929612

https://i.imgur.com/gbERYNa.png

and after I did some research, I found this info about extrabit.biz in this link
and by comparing those info to current info about extrabit.io , it's the same company, link to certificate of incorporation here

So, extrabit.biz was High-yield investment program and it ended up scam  and now they are doing ICO with extrabit.io

I do not know if they are connected to the site? Are they only the same on the name right? Is there any response from the team about this issue.

Admin is generally not responsive. But if this information is true, so they will keep quite and try to raise as much as they can and we will never hear about them in the future anymore - same procedure by every scam ICO

For now, let us hope the admin and developers will answer all these matters. If they don't, this will result for the investors and supporter to have doubt in investing from this ICO.

That is definitely true. Let's give the team members of this project to answer all this matters and clear the people's thought in mind. So that, if no more doubts and uncertainties will be gathered here in the Extrabit project. Especially that we all know that the users, supporters and investors are the most important key for the success of the project. Without them, a project is nothing.

[RasenShuriken]

In my opinion such coincidence isn't surprising at all as such words as "extra" and "bit" meet very often in the sphere of cryptocurrencies. I didn't begin to do hasty conclusions.

We are not talking about names here, it's same company, because they share the same Company number 10929612 and address
here is the information about extrabit.biz in this link and here is the link to certificate of incorporation that belongs to extrabit.io here
=> same company number 10929612 + same address ( 35 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London, United Kingdom, N3 1XW ).

This should really be clarified by the dev and the team so that people's mind would be clear. This is not a coincidence because of they have the same data and probably problem like this should be fixed as soon as possible.

And what we have as a result? Fake project? It would be desirable to receive a detailed explanation from a razabotchik to settle all conflicts.

This action is so harmful to reputation of Extrabit for running their crowdsale. I hope the team will have soon clarification.

I don't think they was a fake project because they can prove their legitimate by registering them on LinkedIn platform but I forgot the links.

[iputnikov]

I admire this project, especially the fact that I like many have the opportunity to invest small amounts, but to get much more

[Arvilaine]

In my opinion such coincidence isn't surprising at all as such words as "extra" and "bit" meet very often in the sphere of cryptocurrencies. I didn't begin to do hasty conclusions.

We are not talking about names here, it's same company, because they share the same Company number 10929612 and address
here is the information about extrabit.biz in this link and here is the link to certificate of incorporation that belongs to extrabit.io here
=> same company number 10929612 + same address ( 35 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London, United Kingdom, N3 1XW ).

This should really be clarified by the dev and the team so that people's mind would be clear. This is not a coincidence because of they have the same data and probably problem like this should be fixed as soon as possible.

And what we have as a result? Fake project? It would be desirable to receive a detailed explanation from a razabotchik to settle all conflicts.

That's why it is important to do research first before joining ICO who promise high returns or dropping a number or ROI. They are actually the project who easily flipped just after their ICO.

[The_Hu]

Looks like this project has a good prospect in the future, I am waiting for the continuity information from this project.

[IpPrograff]

Do you think project administrators can be trusted?and try to invest in this project? it's scary to trust a team I've never heard of before.