|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
 |
February 10, 2011, 09:24:03 PM |
|
Weight?
|
|
|
|
|
|
lumos (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2011, 09:35:30 PM |
|
i'm not sure and i don't have electronic weighing scales, i will try to find this out tommorow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Binford 6100
|
|
February 10, 2011, 10:02:42 PM |
|
i will try to find this out
easiest you get 2 identical envelopes, put coins in one of them, come to post office and ask the person behind desk to weight both envelopes. pretty accurate and the only risk is the coins wil hit each other while in envelope |
You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do.
|
|
|
|
lumos (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2011, 11:09:31 PM |
|
i will try to find this out
easiest you get 2 identical envelopes, put coins in one of them, come to post office and ask the person behind desk to weight both envelopes. pretty accurate and the only risk is the coins wil hit each other while in envelope good idea, thanks for this |
|
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold
|
|
February 11, 2011, 01:50:34 AM |
|
Nice.
Maybe this is correct;
Minted in 1979, called "Bahaar-e Azaadi" or "Bahar-e Azadi"
if so, the gold content;
8.136g * 21.6 Kt (90%)
7.3224g au * $43.8664
$321.21 USD / 0.9291 = 345.72 BTC ea.
plus a premium for being a sweet coin.
|
|
|
|
|
Raulo
|
|
February 11, 2011, 07:48:51 AM |
|
Minted in 1979, called "Bahaar-e Azaadi" or "Bahar-e Azadi"
Correction. The first is minted in 1370=1991/2 AD. The other is 1367=1988/9 AD. |
1HAoJag4C3XtAmQJAhE9FTAAJWFcrvpdLM
|
|
|
|
Binford 6100
|
|
February 11, 2011, 09:48:57 AM |
|
Minted in 1979, called "Bahaar-e Azaadi" or "Bahar-e Azadi"
Correction. The first is minted in 1370=1991/2 AD. The other is 1367=1988/9 AD. it could be really Weight: 8.1360 grams Purity: .900 pure gold per piece maybe selling them separately would result in better price |
You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do.
|
|
|
|
lumos (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2011, 11:02:47 AM |
|
sorry, where are you getting this info from? if its the ebay page i posted, thats another seller, i thought the coins were the same but then i realsied that they might have different mint dates. I'm going to go to a shop tonight and get them weighed, and ask if theres a way to check gold content
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raulo
|
|
February 11, 2011, 11:58:21 AM |
|
sorry, where are you getting this info from?
Me? I can read Persian numerals. The first one is struck in ۱۳۷۰=1370 in Persian calendar. The other is ۱۳۶۷=1367. |
1HAoJag4C3XtAmQJAhE9FTAAJWFcrvpdLM
|
|
|
|
lumos (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2011, 01:21:15 PM |
|
I just measured their diametre, they're 2.2cm, according to this http://www.taxfreegold.co.uk/iran.html they're 8.1360g each with 0.9g of gold. gonna go to gold shop after school to confirm though. |
|
|
|
|
|
lumos (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2011, 01:28:13 PM |
|
Nice.
Maybe this is correct;
Minted in 1979, called "Bahaar-e Azaadi" or "Bahar-e Azadi"
if so, the gold content;
8.136g * 21.6 Kt (90%)
7.3224g au * $43.8664
$321.21 USD / 0.9291 = 345.72 BTC ea.
plus a premium for being a sweet coin.
are you interested in purchasing then?  |
|
|
|
|
|
Binford 6100
|
|
February 11, 2011, 03:00:31 PM |
|
are you interested in purchasing then? i would buy 1. not enough btc for both. shipping registered to europe possoble, please? |
You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do.
|
|
|
|
lumos (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2011, 06:54:07 PM |
|
are you interested in purchasing then? i would buy 1. not enough btc for both. shipping registered to europe possoble, please? cool thanks! i ship from uk, to anywhere i can. 1 SOLD, 1 LEFT i got them weighed and they are 8.15g each, combined 16.3g. |
|
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold
|
|
February 11, 2011, 10:39:34 PM |
|
Well, no. I can't know what to offer you.
|
|
|
|
|
lumos (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2011, 11:23:36 PM |
|
Well, no. I can't know what to offer you.
see the edit, i had them weighed they are 8.136g with 0.9g of gold per gram. |
|
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold
|
|
February 11, 2011, 11:46:16 PM |
|
Well, no. I can't know what to offer you.
see the edit, i had them weighed they are 8.136g with 0.9g of gold per gram. That's what I figured, but Raulo says no. > Correction. The first is minted in 1370=1991/2 AD. The other is 1367=1988/9 AD. According to my numismatics books, only brass coins were struck in those years. |
|
|
|
|
lumos (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2011, 11:52:46 PM |
|
correction on the second one is 1368 not 1367. but now you say this i am suspicious, this selling is cancelled till i find out more. i asked at the gold shop and she didnt do anything but said it was gold, so i assumed that. thanks for telling me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raulo
|
|
February 12, 2011, 07:09:53 AM |
|
correction on the second one is 1368 not 1367.
Yes, 1368. One year later. Sorry. |
1HAoJag4C3XtAmQJAhE9FTAAJWFcrvpdLM
|
|
|
|
Binford 6100
|
|
February 12, 2011, 03:08:15 PM |
|
that's pitty
if they were golden, they would have the same gold content as the sovereign 1 pound coins
that's what i like on them.
|
You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do.
|
|
|
|
