Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2024, 06:43:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Bitcoin Destroying the Planet?  (Read 467 times)
RodeoX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147


The revolution will be monetized!


View Profile
April 25, 2018, 03:28:42 PM
 #21

As opposed to filling trucks with cash and driving the money from place to place?  Roll Eyes
theyoungmillionaire
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 375
Merit: 1021


Just in case no one loves you, I love you 3000.


View Profile
April 25, 2018, 04:45:42 PM
Last edit: April 25, 2018, 06:06:52 PM by theyoungmillionaire
Merited by DdmrDdmr (1)
 #22

-snip-

No, it will need to change or regulators will make it illegal to mine / transact Bitcoin, here are a few problems with Bitcoin…



The BIG Problem With Bitcoin

Many people believe that Bitcoin is the future currency of our world, others argue that it is a store of value. Whilst both could be true, there are fundamental issues with Bitcoin that need to be changed in order for it to scale to mass adoption.

In this article I will be listing the top 3 issues that Bitcoin faces in terms of scalability.

1. Energy consumption

A study from Digiconomist found that each transaction on the Bitcoin blockchain uses 236 KWh worth of electricity, this amount is enough to power 8 U.S households for an entire day.

Now to put things into perspective, there are over 300,000 transactions per day. At this rate, Bitcoin uses more electricity per year than the whole of Nigeria and this is only increasing.

Read more here: Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index - Digiconomist

Proof of work is vastly uneconomic and damages the environment at an alarming rate.

2. Scalability issues

Energy consumption will hinder the scalability issues of Bitcoin, however the other issue that arises with POW mining is that with the increase in cost associated with mining BTC it is less economical to mine Bitcoin. This would limit the distributed nodes (miners) globally and allow a larger percentage of control to the dominant mining pools / farms.

This would lead to a more centralised blockchain, where they can change the rules of BTC as they please.

The supply of Bitcoin is finite, capped at 21 million. Eventually (currently predicted for 2140) Bitcoin's supply will run out. Once this happens, miners will no longer receive rewards for completing blocks but instead will be given fees. The fees will be drastically high in relative terms, and people will stop using the blockchain.

Also, if miners decide that this is uneconomical for them to process the transactions and use their computing power elsewhere the speed of transactions for Bitcoin will drastically slow down, rendering one of the fundamental values of a Bitcoin (speed) useless.

3. The unknown future

Bitcoin is not a superior blockchain, there are hundreds of projects that are faster, cheaper and more valuable than Bitcoin. Bitcoin has market dominance because it is one of the first and most topical cryptocurrency (did you know that the price of BTC has a direct correlation to the amount of google searches). Here are a few things that could really end Bitcoin’s dominant era:

I) Blue chip company coming into the markets

This is more so for all cryptocurrencies, but Bitcoin in particular. It’s not a matter of if but a matter of when a blue-chip company such as Facebook, Amazon or Google decides to implement their own cryptocurrency, they will dominate the market.

The consumer's trust is already with these big companies, and they have the power and capital to influence the entire market.

Another possibility is a potential ‘world coin’ which global governments will all agree on using, this may seem unrealistic but it is definitely not impossible and many benefits would arise from having such a currency.

II) Quantum computing

Bitcoin is said to be Quantum resistant, on the whitepaper it mentions that:

‘To compensate for increasing hardware speed and varying interest in running nodes over time, the proof-of-work difficulty is determined by a moving average targeting an average number of blocks per hour. If they're generated too fast, the difficulty increases.’

This may seem quantum resistant but it is important to understand that the difficulty is changed every 10 minutes and this is more than enough time for QC to mine all of Bitcoin’s remaining coins.

The other issued that QC represents is that there is a possibility of QC calculating people’s private keys for their BTC wallet. I do not know the technical details of how this is done, but from what I have read this is possible.

III) Bitcoin bubble

My last point for this section is that Bitcoin is not being bought as a store of value or a currency by most people, for most people Bitcoin is a speculative investment hoping to make a fortune on something they really don’t know much about.

Once the bubble reaches its peak, and people start panic selling, Bitcoin will inevitably crash with that. After all, Bitcoin’s price is determined by demand vs supply.

In the light of a fair argument, I would like to point out that Bitcoin can change to tackle these issues and substantially increase its long-term survival. Bitcoin has a massive passionate community behind it and this reason why Bitcoin has grown to where it is today.

Thanks for reading,

You should at least cited your source. You just copy and paste it from https://www.quora.com/What-could-cause-the-crash-of-Cryptocurrency by: Devin Milsom, Blockchain Enthusiast, Investor and Blogger
DdmrDdmr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2534
Merit: 11079


There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain


View Profile WWW
April 25, 2018, 06:02:15 PM
 #23

<...>

You should at least cited your source. You just copy and paste it from https://www.quora.com/What-could-cause-the-crash-of-Cryptocurrency by: Devin Milsom, Blockchain Enthusiast, Investor and Blogger

Now this really pisses me off. Well spotted theyoungmillionaire. Thanks for that.

Joms123, you cannot be proud of yourself for copying verbatim and pasting an article and making it sound like it was your words, even down to the “Thanks for reading,” that makes it look a bit more personal and help set the bait. I checked your profile before awarding you a sMerit, saw it a bit shady, but gave you the benefit of the doubt.

Conning people for merits will get you at least on everybody´s ignore list, and moderators may take further action.
If you do write based on an article, have the decency to specify the source, or at least summarize it in a very different manner. It goes without saying that you should also put in a bit of effort to show your personal opinion on the matter (and I don´t mean a one liner opinion).

That in not the way to go for actmyname’s https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3046992.msg31359167#msg31359167.

Don’t make people waste their time. It's hard enough having to find meritable posts without needing to look for a minefield of sMerit bate traps.
Truth be told, you managed to swindle 3 sMerits, but It’s not worth it.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!