Bounty Hunters Read

[Joel_Jantsen]

It does not really matter if a bounty is managed by a newbie or a reputable manager because most bounty campaigns will only held the funds and not on the manager .

It's not about the funds, it's the quality of the service provided by the manager which affects the forum and the entire project. A newbie cunt who happened to the forum 2 days back wouldn't be the best choice for any company to trust him with their reputation.

the manager does also give a notice before they start a bounty campaign that they are not responsible if whatever happens on the campaign. They will only do their own job and that is to manage the campaign .

Which manager has done that? Anyone from the above list? The above-mentioned managers are responsible for the shitposting plaque on this forum.

[1714749551]

1714749551

[1714749551]

1714749551

[JanpriX]

the manager does also give a notice before they start a bounty campaign that they are not responsible if whatever happens on the campaign. They will only do their own job and that is to manage the campaign .

Which manager has done that? Anyone from the above list? The above-mentioned managers are responsible for the shitposting plaque on this forum.

Very well said and I agree to what Joel_Jantsen said.

Strangely enough, the list of "managers" in the OP are mostly unknown folks (unknown in terms of forum reputation/trust) who, I guess, jumped into this forum when the ICO craze was happening and decided that they will become managers so that they'll get the money being offered by different ICOs left and right. As some posts stated, some of them already now have negative trusts and most likely did something bad in managing their own campaign.

It is also noticeable that some of these managers have negative trust saying that they are promoting scam ICOs. So in a way, these campaigns that they promote helped these ICOs scam people and take away their money which resulted to a very negative connotation about cryptocurrencies.

[Kemarit]

LMAO, What's the OP criteria for him listing so called "trusted" bounty managers. I quickly scanned the list and I saw one who has negged already can he be trusted then?  . And as @Patatas has mentioned, bounty campaigns has deluded this forum already and has over ran by spammers posting non-sense to meet the requirements.

Moreover, these participants consider the above managers as the God of the forum since their livelihood is heavily determined by the bounties they made by enrolling themselves into the bounties run by these managers. No wonder they're the best for them. These managers would apply in the bounties with their own accounts and won't even get caught for it.

Just like what happened on hua_hui where he do get his negative trust due to enrolling his own alts on one of the bounty campaigns which is really not to be trusted. Bounty campaign manager can be called to be the favorites but not literally to be trusted anytime.Even newbie ones are capable on doing to handle participants as long he do have the experience. I'm not against with managers but as a bounty hunter just join up on where we do like.

I'm not familiar with hua_hui case but it doesn't sounds right if you yourself enrolling your own alts that's a total abuse of the system. But as long as bounty whores getting accepted by those red trust managers then this whole bounty drama will go on. Lately though, there's some merit chances, and I'm sure that a lot of junior members are affected by the new rule. So go cry to your favorite bounty managers and tell them you all got demoted. 

[jvdp]

LMAO, What's the OP criteria for him listing so called "trusted" bounty managers. I quickly scanned the list and I saw one who has negged already can he be trusted then?  . And as @Patatas has mentioned, bounty campaigns has deluded this forum already and has over ran by spammers posting non-sense to meet the requirements.

Moreover, these participants consider the above managers as the God of the forum since their livelihood is heavily determined by the bounties they made by enrolling themselves into the bounties run by these managers. No wonder they're the best for them. These managers would apply in the bounties with their own accounts and won't even get caught for it.

Just like what happened on hua_hui where he do get his negative trust due to enrolling his own alts on one of the bounty campaigns which is really not to be trusted. Bounty campaign manager can be called to be the favorites but not literally to be trusted anytime.Even newbie ones are capable on doing to handle participants as long he do have the experience. I'm not against with managers but as a bounty hunter just join up on where we do like.

I'm not familiar with hua_hui case but it doesn't sounds right if you yourself enrolling your own alts that's a total abuse of the system. But as long as bounty whores getting accepted by those red trust managers then this whole bounty drama will go on. Lately though, there's some merit chances, and I'm sure that a lot of junior members are affected by the new rule. So go cry to your favorite bounty managers and tell them you all got demoted. 

That is so pathetic buddy. All the junior members without merit will be fucked because of this move from the forum. Hopefully these people work hard to get the merit and solve the issue for them.

Then this manager is doing good so far and most of his project reached soft cap at least.