Karl Max will never be considered as spam as its from their team and he does that in every thread they have.
I would like to see that statement confirmed by a team member, such as cheus, before believing it.
Why would a team member spoil the thread of the project for which he is working, or why would any project allow a team member to do so?
If i judge from your previous replies on the previous thread about a moderated thread you were talking,
you, aioc and some others, you were replying to me and the others that we were presenting some facts about credits.
So when you reply to me and others about a moderated thread you were referring mostly to our action.
With 'spam' I indeed refer to your copy-paste posts, over and over again, and with 'fud' I refer to (among others) your accusations of CREDITS being a scam without delivering proof. It is that simple. Constructive posts are not spam. Proving scams is not fud. But since you copy-paste and accuse without proof your posts simply and objectively classify as 'spam' and 'fud'. That's not a matter of opinion, it is as it is.
So once more. As long as you and others make objective and constructive discussion and NO just stupid updates, creating fake accounts to tell us to f*ck off about our critic, moon price predictions and nonsense achievements about 1 trillion TPS to create fake hypes EVERY DAY, then there is no problem.
Lets see the value speaking.
Where have I posted stupid updates, creating false accounts or used faul language? Please give reference when you accuse me of such things. It seems to be your habbit to accuse without delivering proper proof.
About the 1 million TPS; that's the most eye catching CREDITS feature. Of course you will find interested people talking about that. You will find talk about key features of a project in every single ANN thread at Bitcointalk. What's your obsession with CREDITS in specific? Warn people against losing money from investing, as you claimed? You'd be one busy guy on this forum if that were to be your true sole motive.
Besides all that you are forgetting that you are posting in the CREDITS ANN thread. And if they want to keep the vibes in their thread positive they have every right to do so by continuing with a self-moderated thread. And if you instead want to create negative vibes around the projec then what's stopping you from creating a [FUD][ICO]CREDITS thread? Self-moderated or not.
About fake hyping posts. I don't like those either, so in this we may agree. We'll find that especially in over crowded Telegram chats of any project. Here at Bitcointalk you often find newbies posting such nonsense to increase their post count. And again you'll find such posts scattered all over Bitcointalk, not just in the CREDITS thread. It usually has nothing to do with paid shills. But you see what you want, or decided, to see.
Good night.
Ask them why Karl Max is doing it and not me.
So from your side a review/research that has been made is fud and i should just make 1 post about it on page 120 for example and to the rest 100 pages i should never consider talking about it or what? How others that visit the thread will be able to see the research if i just comment about it just once?
For me at least every 5 pages, is allowed to post about it if someone presents facts.
You are talking about fud for once more and we explained thousand of times what fud is. And when you present a research about how credits operates, their "partners", or a code review or you show how fake accounts work or new accounts that are created just to talk about moon prices etc, this is not fud. ITS FACTS!
I said as long as you and other dont make stupid updates, fake accounts, moon price predictions to create fake hypes etc it wont be a problem.
I didnt say that YOU specifically you are creating fake accounts etc. I cant know that.
About 1 mln tps. The "eye catching" feature as you say, it should be correct first and then you can praise your coin's feature all day long.
As long as its just a number in a whitepaper then when you (plural) talk about it with fancy words every day to convince newcomers to invest, then this is not ok and you are manipulating newcomers.
Lets not keep talking about this nonsense again as is not a "constructive" discussion. On previous research we explained all the necessary information about 1 mln tps and their code.
"Keep the vibes"? If all this are fake vibes by fake accounts and bots, paid shillers and investors that are trembling to not loose their investment and they dont care if others get scammed then for me its should be stopped.
Believe me i already thought of creating a new thread.
If they delete even ONE of my comments without a proper reason im going to do it.
