High level of activity in Top 100 addresses

[davidgdg]

Of the top 100 addresses, the first 57 have all shown activity within the last 10 days. Is this usual? They can't surely all be exchange wallets? 

http://bitcoinrichlist.com/top500

[1715107187]

1715107187

[1715107187]

1715107187

[1715107187]

1715107187

[1715107187]

1715107187

[andr3w321]

I'm the author of the site.  I just recently started updating the list more frequently.  Most of the transactions are people spamming the address with .001 bitcoins and adding a note as you can see here:  https://blockchain.info/address/1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJusN455paPH or by clicking on the address at the top of the page here http://bitcoinrichlist.com/address/1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJusN455paPH?charttype=balance  Eventually I plan on making the last transaction field more accurate by only looking at transactions > 1 BTC or something but for now this will have to do.

[bryant.coleman]

Most of the transactions are people spamming the address with .001 bitcoins and adding a note

Thanks for making things clear. What they are going to get in return by spamming the DPR Seized wallet? 

[wmcleod]

That'd be scary if they were all owned by exchanges. 

[bryant.coleman]

That'd be scary if they were all owned by exchanges. 

I don't think the majority of them are owned by exchanges. How many exchanges will be there who hold more than 10K bitcoins? I don't think that the number is more than 10 (10% of the top 100).