NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information

[abctc]

24238      4747512364439223888      25.12.2013 16:37:09   
0      0 + 0      0 B   
1      6695270637730030159      9266 %

me too.

but something wrong.  I see 641 unconfirmed tx, but   0 + 0  !!

[1714027622]

1714027622

[1714027622]

1714027622

[1714027622]

1714027622

[1714027622]

1714027622

[ferment]

Also I'm running Ubuntu 13.04 (64 bit), is that OK to use as I know you recommend Debian.
 

I'm running 30+ nodes on Ubuntu. It's really personal preference.

[MyZhre]

24240      666666817378784428

any body known the height of the bug chain is now?

[zhangdu]

1739068987193023818 is the genesis block

so 4747512364439223888 is 1 of 72, then he should say something, tell us how he could generate the blocks continously.

[S3MKi]

      24240      666666817378784428      25 Cнeжaнь 2013 16:38:27   
      
      0      0 + 0      0 B   
      
      1      7106966408204304785      869 %

[BloodyRookie]

In the "Active peers" panel, the icons vanish after some time. I can't kick nodes then. Any advice how I can recover the icons?

[Come-from-Beyond]

24238      4747512364439223888      25.12.2013 16:37:09   
0      0 + 0      0 B   
1      6695270637730030159      9266 %

me too.

but something wrong.  I see 641 unconfirmed tx, but   0 + 0  !!

U node sees incorrect blockchain which is longer.

[Come-from-Beyond]

1739068987193023818 is the genesis block

so 4747512364439223888 is 1 of 72, then he should say something, tell us how he could generate the blocks continously.

He owns 5% and actively forges while other major stakeholders don't. Nothing special.

[BitThink]

Nxt seems more and more popular these days. I'm a little bit worrying about the short address length now. It's seems there are only 2^64 addresses, much less than 2^160 of bitcoin. According to http://preshing.com/20110504/hash-collision-probabilities/,  if there're more than 1M addresses, there's more than 0.01% probability to have a collision. What happens if someone have the same address as me? Does it mean both of us can control the nxt in this address?

Do you mean that the probability refers to same addresses being reassigned even though the users will have used different passphrases?  

Yes, it seems you are the only one who get what I mean. Maybe I did not express clear enough. Since there're less than 2^64 nxt addresses, if there're mor e than 1M people generate addresses, assume they are all using the different secret phrases, there's still 0.01% percent for two people to have the same nxt address.

I haven't found the answer in the wiki, and I have no idea that this issue has been already discussed millions of times.

[BitThink]

Nxt seems more and more popular these days. I'm a little bit worrying about the short address length now. It's seems there are only 2^64 addresses, much less than 2^160 of bitcoin. According to http://preshing.com/20110504/hash-collision-probabilities/,  if there're more than 1M addresses, there's more than 0.01% probability to have a collision. What happens if someone have the same address as me? Does it mean both of us can control the nxt in this address?

Do you mean that the probability refers to same addresses being reassigned even though the users will have used different passphrases?  

Yes, it seems you are the only one who get what I mean. Maybe I did not express clear enough. Since there're less than 2^64 nxt addresses, if there're mor e than 1M people generate addresses, assume they are all using the different secret phrases, there's still 0.01% percent for two people to have the same nxt address.

I haven't found the answer in the wiki, and I have no idea that this issue has been already discussed millions of times.

Ok, I found one place states that nxt supports 10^77 addresses, but what I have already seen are all very short addresses (around 20 digits). Does it mean 'secret phrase' -> 'account' is not a determined function, but a function depends on the current account count. I mean if this function finds that there're already a lot of accounts, it will try to generate a longer account?

[zhangdu]

1739068987193023818 is the genesis block

so 4747512364439223888 is 1 of 72, then he should say something, tell us how he could generate the blocks continously.

He owns 5% and actively forges while other major stakeholders don't. Nothing special.

ok, accepted. but i still can't generate block. I go to bed now. merry xmas！

[S3MKi]

   24241      482115092852324318      25 Cнeжaнь 2013 16:52:50   
      
      45      14'121 + 45      5'799 B   
      
      1      6779105664811178698      1737 %

[Come-from-Beyond]

I mean if this function finds that there're already a lot of accounts, it will try to generate a longer account?

No.

[chinabreak123]

hey,CFB,just my voice,i think this ddos attack don't come from a hacker,maby come from the othercoin developer team.
just maby,i wish i'm wrong.
great job,i like nxt!

[BitThink]

I mean if this function finds that there're already a lot of accounts, it will try to generate a longer account?

No.

Then I don't understand why the current addresses are all around 20 digits long, but the address space is 10^77.

[gginer]

-

[Come-from-Beyond]

I mean if this function finds that there're already a lot of accounts, it will try to generate a longer account?

No.

Then I don't understand why the current addresses are all around 20 digits long, but the address space is 10^77.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=cr&q=nxt+coin+security

[abctc]

   24241      482115092852324318      25 Cнeжaнь 2013 16:52:50   
      
      45      14'121 + 45      5'799 B   
      
      1      6779105664811178698      1737 %

- didn't you see Unconfirmed transactions [640] ?

[starik69]

I see 24241 and Unconfirmed transactions [640]

[Come-from-Beyond]

@ Guy who asked about lost aliases:

Check if u got them back, plz