|
gbeirn
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 12:04:47 AM |
|
I guess we could have a motion to put a proposal for a vote when the voting system being implemented.
I propose that once a month a random account has all it's coins transferred back to the Genesis account!  |
NXT VPS Server Donations can be sent here: 6044921191674841550At the end of each month I will donate some of them back to the community. This is separate from my main wallet so you can keep track of them. I will keep them in there and only use them for hosting. |
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
BitcoinForumator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:05:24 AM |
|
I guess we could have a motion to put a proposal for a vote when the voting system being implemented.
I propose that once a month a random account has all it's coins transferred back to the Genesis account! Sounds like Hunger Games  |
|
|
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:05:59 AM |
|
I would reserve every 10th blockgeneration right to the public nodes (every node has the same chance to generate a block), encouraging them to be up an running. If a public node is up and running AND an account is open on that node, it should have the right to earn some transaction fees (even if it´s empty - due to security reasons I wouldn´t leave my wallet open on a node where all my nxts are in)
Just my 2 nxts.
What do you think?
Any thoughts on this? CfB? BCNext? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:08:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:11:04 AM |
|
Even more nodes deployed!...
jeebus dude, makes my 9 nodes seem like childs play. though I did set up some very high horsepower beasts (8GB RAM and tons of network bandwidth on 1Gbps ports) how on earth do you manage them all? mine require frequent upervision to make sure they dont get stuck on a block or something |
|
|
|
|
ferment
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
IDEX - LIVE Real-time DEX
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:20:46 AM |
|
Even more nodes deployed!...
jeebus dude, makes my 9 nodes seem like childs play. though I did set up some very high horsepower beasts (8GB RAM and tons of network bandwidth on 1Gbps ports) how on earth do you manage them all? mine require frequent upervision to make sure they dont get stuck on a block or something I've been working on monitoring, tools and automation. It's still primitive, but will improve after I get the 100 nodes all up. Some simple scripting can go a long way with identical servers (even without using cssh or capistrano). For example, to restart all of them: $ for i in {1..70}; do ssh user@node$i.nxtbase.com -t -C "sudo supervisorctl restart nxt"; done
So, if you take that pattern and combine it with some high level scripts, you can do a lot with basic primitives without burning time on higher level tools. Once the 100 are up, I'll start writing monitoring scripts for "stuck block" and other problems to have a "self healing" kind of system. My approach is to push toward scaling problems quickly and then start playing whack-a-mole on the suck. |
|
|
|
|
nexern
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:25:16 AM |
|
Even more nodes deployed!...
jeebus dude, makes my 9 nodes seem like childs play. though I did set up some very high horsepower beasts (8GB RAM and tons of network bandwidth on 1Gbps ports) how on earth do you manage them all? mine require frequent upervision to make sure they dont get stuck on a block or something I've been working on monitoring, tools and automation. It's still primitive, but will improve after I get the 100 nodes all up. Some simple scripting can go a long way with identical servers (even without using cssh or capistrano). For example, to restart all of them: $ for i in {1..70}; do ssh user@node$i.nxtbase.com -t -C "sudo supervisorctl restart nxt"; done
So, if you take that pattern and combine it with some high level scripts, you can do a lot with basic primitives without burning time on higher level tools. Once the 100 are up, I'll start writing monitoring scripts for "stuck block" and other problems to have a "self healing" kind of system. My approach is to push toward scaling problems quickly and then start playing whack-a-mole on the suck. great! thats the way, automation and monitoring... ps: what would we do without terminal, same here  |
|
|
|
|
ferment
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
IDEX - LIVE Real-time DEX
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:27:59 AM |
|
jeebus dude, makes my 9 nodes seem like childs play. though I did set up some very high horsepower beasts (8GB RAM and tons of network bandwidth on 1Gbps ports)
Also, my preference is for more servers over larger ones (nice linear horizontal scaling). That way if some percentage of them has problems, the show goes on. For example, given 8 nodes of 1GB each, if half are borked, you still have 4 plugging away. If 1 big server has a problem, it's completely out of the game regardless of amount of hardware. Obviously my task is to reduce the overhead of managing 100 to approach that of managing 1. |
|
|
|
S3MKi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:30:40 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wakasaki808
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:31:44 AM |
|
been fluctuating for the last few hours. If anything its good for Nxt seeing as it helps spread the distribution and get Nxt to more people, also it was just at .04 not even a couple days ago. So I expected some pullback. |
|
|
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:32:17 AM |
|
Nxt is getting distributed, big stakeholders are selling. That is a GOOD thing! |
|
|
|
|
Eksotik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:32:55 AM |
|
Is there something weird going on in nxt network / blockchain? http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=2000&tra=14529141608986373607there's one of my transactions: Over 12 hour ago it was 556/1440 confirmations and now it is 530/1440. What happened to 26 confirmations? And is it normal to take +24h for 1440? |
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:34:29 AM |
|
strange, but at this time feeling much better this level. |
|
|
|
S3MKi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:35:05 AM |
|
Nxt is getting distributed, big stakeholders are selling. That is a GOOD thing! Is low price good? |
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:35:14 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:35:23 AM |
|
Maybe you were on a wrong fork. Everything seems normal in my client. |
|
|
|
|
jubalix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1022
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:36:13 AM |
|
i am having serious problems with the alias system
I get transaction
{"transaction":"1.........6"}
back but the alias never show up?
|
|
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:36:46 AM |
|
Nxt is getting distributed, big stakeholders are selling. That is a GOOD thing! Is low price good? It is. So more people can buy in and get part of Nxt! |
|
|
|
|
|
pandaisftw
|
|
December 27, 2013, 12:37:02 AM |
|
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=2&sub=3Disregarding price (which will up go and down anyways), the volume we have been seeing lately is looking very healthy. Also, if the huge increase in # of transactions from the alias system is any indicator, as more and more features are added, the nxt network will be very busy! http://coinmarketcap.com/Additionally, the number of 2nd gen coins in the top 10 are taking over. This could signify a paradigm shift away from copycoins to actual useful coins competing directly against bitcoin. 2014 is going to be very exciting 
|
NXT: 13095091276527367030
|
|
|
|
