NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information

[davethetrousers]

ZeroTheGreat, remember that those are upper bounds on forge time.

A wallet that is unlocked 24/7 on an always up-to-date server will forge a block more often, because of the large portion of all NXT currently in locked accounts, lagging/stuck nodes (temporary phenomenon atm, though) etc.

No, that feature postponed. If 900M locked, 100M now'll forge like 100M. Later we'll have to say "200k unfrozen equivalent coins", and full amount can be any. Multiplier unthinkable now.

Really? That would mean that when 90% NXT are locked, forging would only go on at 10% speed. Sounds strange to me.

[1713542647]

1713542647

[1713542647]

1713542647

[1713542647]

1713542647

[1713542647]

1713542647

[ZeroTheGreat]

I really like the basic concept and nxt and I also hold some but damn the forging is not worth at all. On a side note: I hate Java so hard.

Forging = 95% supporting concept + 5% business. Smth like that for now.

[ZeroTheGreat]

DGEX :: descendant of MTGOX -

 

Unwanted child )))

[gbeirn]

@dgex.com:
"DGEX is performing server migration. Trading should be online by 11:00 PM GMT. Thank you for your patience. (Flush your DNS to access the new server sooner)."

Ah, that long?

Only 5 and a half hours.

[ZeroTheGreat]

Question on forging:

Say I have 100K Nxt. One simple case is to forge to get tx fee in a single account, and the other case is to distribute those 100K Nxt into 5 account with each one 20K Nxt and forge with those 5 account at the same time. So do they have exactly the same probability for forging for a block?

Same EV, different dispersion (so foring pool reasonable in future).

[davethetrousers]

@dgex.com:
"DGEX is performing server migration. Trading should be online by 11:00 PM GMT. Thank you for your patience. (Flush your DNS to access the new server sooner)."

Ah, that long?

Only 5 and a half hours.

Price will dance all over the place right after restart.

Later on it will be more smooth than ever, if the new server is actually better than before.

[TwinWinNerD]

ZeroTheGreat, remember that those are upper bounds on forge time.

A wallet that is unlocked 24/7 on an always up-to-date server will forge a block more often, because of the large portion of all NXT currently in locked accounts, lagging/stuck nodes (temporary phenomenon atm, though) etc.

No, that feature postponed. If 900M locked, 100M now'll forge like 100M. Later we'll have to say "200k unfrozen equivalent coins", and full amount can be any. Multiplier unthinkable now.

Really? That would mean that when 90% NXT are locked, forging would only go on at 10% speed. Sounds strange to me.

I really doubt that too! We are not too far of 1 Block/minute. So something doesnt compute here.

I guess it is like this now:

(Coins you forge with)/(total coins forging) = % change of creating the next block

[rickyjames]

I have a gap in my knowledge so I'm gonna ask a dumb question.  Just what IS the difference between a node up in the cloud and a peer running as a desktop (or Pi) client??  

We've got all these VPNs set up all over the world now - ferment alone has set up almost 100 - and these are "nodes".  They are all running the NXT 0.4.7e Java server software.  They are forging blocks.  Yet if I look at the "peer" list on my desktop client (where I have actually generated 9 blocks myself so far the past couple of days) I only see 52 "online peers".  If the "nodes" are generating "blocks" too, why aren't they considered "peers" as well and show up in the online "peer" list?  

I note one of the most prolific block generators is 4747512364439223888, a 50,000,000+ NXT account that has generated 3304 blocks so far, earning 56,290 NXT in fees.  Yet this chap  doesn't show up at all in the "online peer" list, which for me only lists two multi-million NXT accounts out of 54 as forging blocks : 78:46:63:221 at 6.6 million NXT and vps07.nxtcrypto.org with 2.1 million.   Somebody looking at just his desktop client with his minimum 10 NXT in it hoping to forge a block not only is at the back of the pack statistically speaking, he can't even see the front of the pack.

Am I missing something here?  Any elaboration somebody feels like sharing would be appreciated, thanks.

[TwinWinNerD]

I have a gap in my knowledge so I'm gonna ask a dumb question.  Just what IS the difference between a node up in the cloud and a peer running as a desktop (or Pi) client??  

We've got all these VPNs set up all over the world now - ferment alone has set up almost 100 - and these are "nodes".  They are all running the NXT 0.4.7e Java server software.  They are forging blocks.  Yet if I look at the "peer" list on my desktop client (where I have actually generated 9 blocks myself so far the past couple of days) I only see 52 "online peers".  If the "nodes" are generating "blocks" too, why aren't they considered "peers" as well and show up in the online "peer" list?  

I note one of the most prolific block generators is 4747512364439223888, a 50,000,000+ NXT account that has generated 3304 blocks so far, earning 56,290 NXT in fees.  Yet this chap  doesn't show up at all in the "online peer" list, which only lists two multi-million NXT accounts out of 54 as forging blocks : 78:46:63:221 at 6.6 million NXT and vps07.nxtcrypto.org with 2.1 million.   Somebody looking at just his desktop client with his minimum 10 NXT in it hoping to forge a block not only is at the back of the pack statistically speaking, he can't even see the front of the pack.

Am I missing something here?  Any elaboration somebody feels like sharing would be appreciated, thanks.

There are active peers and known peers. If your client runs long enough, you will see EVERYONE forging as an known peer.

EDIT: haha someone launched a node called giantdildo

[gbeirn]

I have a gap in my knowledge so I'm gonna ask a dumb question.  Just what IS the difference between a node up in the cloud and a peer running as a desktop (or Pi) client??  

We've got all these VPNs set up all over the world now - ferment alone has set up almost 100 - and these are "nodes".  They are all running the NXT 0.4.7e Java server software.  They are forging blocks.  Yet if I look at the "peer" list on my desktop client (where I have actually generated 9 blocks myself so far the past couple of days) I only see 52 "online peers".  If the "nodes" are generating "blocks" too, why aren't they considered "peers" as well and show up in the online "peer" list?  

I note one of the most prolific block generators is 4747512364439223888, a 50,000,000+ NXT account that has generated 3304 blocks so far, earning 56,290 NXT in fees.  Yet this chap  doesn't show up at all in the "online peer" list, which only lists two multi-million NXT accounts out of 54 as forging blocks : 78:46:63:221 at 6.6 million NXT and vps07.nxtcrypto.org with 2.1 million.   Somebody looking at just his desktop client with his minimum 10 NXT in it hoping to forge a block not only is at the back of the pack statistically speaking, he can't even see the front of the pack.

Am I missing something here?  Any elaboration somebody feels like sharing would be appreciated, thanks.

There are active peers and known peers. If your client runs long enough, you will see EVERYONE forging as an known peer.

EDIT: haha someone launched a node called giantdildo

Correct, every computer running NRS will show up eventually as long as they aren't behind a NAT. The reason for all the nodes we setup is to ensure there are a steady supply of nodes that are full open and accessible to everyone (i.e. not behind a NAT/firewall, running 24x7)

[rickyjames]

There are active peers and known peers. If your client runs long enough, you will see EVERYONE forging as an known peer.

So does this mean that some who are listed in the known peer list on a particular desktop client are actually active peers, and the given desktop client hasn't figured that out yet?  Just how long does it take for a desktop client to sync up and see all of these new VPSs out there on the cloud?

[TwinWinNerD]

There are active peers and known peers. If your client runs long enough, you will see EVERYONE forging as an known peer.

So does this mean that some who are listed in the known peer list on a particular desktop client are actually active peers, and the given desktop client hasn't figured that out yet?  Just how long does it take for a desktop client to sync up and see all of these new VPSs out there on the cloud?

no, that means, that node chose to only take these nodes as active peers. The number of active peers is limited and the peers are chosen randomly if i am not mistaken.

So you will be an active peer somewhere

[abuelau]

I have deployed additional nodes. I've been focussing on regions that don't have many nodes yet.

Total nodes deployed: 20

Regions:

South America (Sao Paulo, Brazil): 10 (nxt2.tweetmondo.com to nxt11.tweetmondo.com)
Australia (Sydney): 5 (nxt12.tweetmondo.com to nxt16.tweetmondo.com)
Malaysia (Singapore): 5 (nxt17.tweetmondo.com to nxt21.tweetmondo.com)

If you want more nodes in these regions, please donate 1000 NXT per month per additional node to: 9060914620736248721

Thanks!

[ZeroTheGreat]

ZeroTheGreat, remember that those are upper bounds on forge time.

A wallet that is unlocked 24/7 on an always up-to-date server will forge a block more often, because of the large portion of all NXT currently in locked accounts, lagging/stuck nodes (temporary phenomenon atm, though) etc.

No, that feature postponed. If 900M locked, 100M now'll forge like 100M. Later we'll have to say "200k unfrozen equivalent coins", and full amount can be any. Multiplier unthinkable now.

Really? That would mean that when 90% NXT are locked, forging would only go on at 10% speed. Sounds strange to me.

Look at statistics, we went to ~1440 blocks per day not so long ago. DDoS splitted network and calculatable low % of all coins was forging main chain with low speed against needed 1440/24h. I'm little surprised why "Transparent Forging" wasn't built-in. Code wasn't ready?

[gbeirn]

There are active peers and known peers. If your client runs long enough, you will see EVERYONE forging as an known peer.

So does this mean that some who are listed in the known peer list on a particular desktop client are actually active peers, and the given desktop client hasn't figured that out yet?  Just how long does it take for a desktop client to sync up and see all of these new VPSs out there on the cloud?

Not sure, it's in the software code somewhere, maybe there is even a limit. Plus I'm sure there a bunch of nodes behind NATs like people running on their home desktop, likely that 50M account.

[ZeroTheGreat]

ZeroTheGreat, remember that those are upper bounds on forge time.

A wallet that is unlocked 24/7 on an always up-to-date server will forge a block more often, because of the large portion of all NXT currently in locked accounts, lagging/stuck nodes (temporary phenomenon atm, though) etc.

No, that feature postponed. If 900M locked, 100M now'll forge like 100M. Later we'll have to say "200k unfrozen equivalent coins", and full amount can be any. Multiplier unthinkable now.

Really? That would mean that when 90% NXT are locked, forging would only go on at 10% speed. Sounds strange to me.

I really doubt that too! We are not too far of 1 Block/minute. So something doesnt compute here.

I guess it is like this now:

(Coins you forge with)/(total coins forging) = % change of creating the next block

[notsoshifty]

The client seems to eat more and more memory over time. Anyone else noticed that?

same here, i have to write a small script to restart nxt after it crash

yeah, something's got to be done about this.
Although RAM is cheap and getting cheaper, some leaking is going on for sure 
it's not a problem for home users who just launch, make some payments and close, but for public nodes it is an issue.

I never saw Java memory issues with my node, and it served several tens of GB of traffic (public static IP; hallmarked). It did get stuck on some occasions (running and serving requests, but not on the latest block even after browser refresh), and a restart usually fixed that, although sometimes it required reverting to a backup blockchain.

I'd like to look at any Java memory issues you see. If you consistently see out of memory exceptions, please run the client with the following parameters:

 -verbose:gc -Xloggc:gc.log -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps -XX:+PrintGCDetails

And then share the resulting gc.log file. NB: this gets overwritten on start, so take a copy first.

You can also run it with this parameter:

 -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError

This will produce a large file which is basically a copy of the entire heap at the point, so it's best to do it on a node with moderate memory settings (e.g. 512MB, not 4GB) and make sure you have sufficient disk space. Zip/gzip this up and upload it somewhere (e.g. mega) and share details. NB: very important, if you do this DO NOT enter your secret key on that node as it is likely to be visible in the heap dump (hallmarks are okay).

[TwinWinNerD]

ZeroTheGreat, remember that those are upper bounds on forge time.

A wallet that is unlocked 24/7 on an always up-to-date server will forge a block more often, because of the large portion of all NXT currently in locked accounts, lagging/stuck nodes (temporary phenomenon atm, though) etc.

No, that feature postponed. If 900M locked, 100M now'll forge like 100M. Later we'll have to say "200k unfrozen equivalent coins", and full amount can be any. Multiplier unthinkable now.

Really? That would mean that when 90% NXT are locked, forging would only go on at 10% speed. Sounds strange to me.

I really doubt that too! We are not too far of 1 Block/minute. So something doesnt compute here.

I guess it is like this now:

(Coins you forge with)/(total coins forging) = % change of creating the next block

but how would that work?
We are nearly at 1/minute, with your formula that means that nearly all 1 billion coins are forging? Thats 100% not the case

[Come-from-Beyond]

In continuation of the announcement that we r looking for more Nxt core devs, there are features we r planning to implement till block 525960 (in alphabetical order):

- Alias System (done)
- Arbitrary Messages (partially)
- Asset Exchange (done)
- Distributed Computing (concept not ready)
- Distributed Storage
- Instant Transactions (requires peer review)
- Mixing Service (concept not ready)
- Multisignatures
- Service Providers
- Shrinking
- Smart Contracts (concept not ready)
- Transparent Mining (partially)
- Two-phase Payments
- Voting System
- some non-revealed features

I'd like to get ur opinions what features should be implemented in the 1st place.

[TwinWinNerD]

distributed exchange not on the list?