Bitcoin Forum
August 14, 2022, 01:40:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 [1491] 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761308 times)
ImmortAlex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:34:14 PM
 #29801

why dont adjust fees in a predictably, dynamically and automatically way?? i mean, drecrease fees in relation with number of blocks in the block chain or something that makes fees go down as people use nxt more....as people use nxt more, price should rise, so, it would also be related to prices...
We can't correlate fee with any prices. Blockchain doesn't know anything about real world.
We can correlate min fee with block numbers. But I doubt someone can give us any good formula.

So I personally prefer lowering fee from time to time on user's demand. It will be fight between users and forgers. Forgers always want higher fees, users always want lower ones. So we'll have long voting threads, blockchain forks (if someone release software with lower fees) and so on Smiley Democracy, as you like it Smiley

Another way is to set very low fee right now, but doesn't increase transactions limit in block (255 for now). So in future users will fight for place in block, setting higher fees.
But very low fee in present time can hurt forgers.
1660441213
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1660441213

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1660441213
Reply with quote  #2

1660441213
Report to moderator
1660441213
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1660441213

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1660441213
Reply with quote  #2

1660441213
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:34:59 PM
 #29802

Fee: 1.0
Until we really have high price for 1 NXT.
Until we really have big number of transactions per block.
Until we really start to scream: "WTF, I buy one gram of blow cheap cheneese smartphone and need to pay 5% of it's price as fee!"

Exactly, my thoughts. Would also like a % of transaction's amount to be spent as fee with min 1NXT.

Reducing Nxt fee lowers incentive to forge with large Nxt account, while at the same time encouraging use of Nxt features. I like it.

Why not waiting for a month or two? Why the hurry?
ImmortAlex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:35:25 PM
 #29803

How's the weather in St. Petersburg these days?
Why do you think he is from St.Petersburg?

Why do you think he's not?
He is from Minsk, Belarus.
abctc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024



View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:36:15 PM
 #29804

why dont adjust fees in a predictably, dynamically and automatically way?? i mean, drecrease fees in relation with number of blocks in the block chain or something that makes fees go down as people use nxt more....as people use nxt more, price should rise, so, it would also be related to prices...
- no need, because in the future the senders will compete for a place in the next block for the place for theirs transactions (like in the bitcoin even today).

█████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
   
, the Next platform.  Magis quam Moneta (More than a Coin)
opticalcarrier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:36:30 PM
 #29805

I would be ok with moving to 0.1, but only full nxt numbers should be able to be sent.

So you cannot send for example 0.5 nxt to someone. The minimum you can send is 1nxt. will this be the case?

If you have 105.45 nxt, you can send 105nxt, the 0.45 can only be spent on fees.

im curious, what is your rationale behind this structure?
and I am perfectly fine with 0.1, but if CfB *really* believes the price will jump we may as well move to .01.  That would be what I call 'conviction'.  But .001 would be asking for trouble at this point, IMO

given that it looks like the system as designed supports only 2 decimal places.  A decompile shows getBalance methods using some integer casting operations being divided by 100L.  So how much extra work would it be to implement .001 versus .01?
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:36:58 PM
 #29806

why dont adjust fees in a predictably, dynamically and automatically way?? i mean, drecrease fees in relation with number of blocks in the block chain or something that makes fees go down as people use nxt more....as people use nxt more, price should rise, so, it would also be related to prices...
We can't correlate fee with any prices. Blockchain doesn't know anything about real world.
We can correlate min fee with block numbers. But I doubt someone can give us any good formula.

So I personally prefer lowering fee from time to time on user's demand. It will be fight between users and forgers. Forgers always want higher fees, users always want lower ones. So we'll have long voting threads, blockchain forks (if someone release software with lower fees) and so on Smiley Democracy, as you like it Smiley

If forgers don't agree, they don't let their software sign those transactions. It is as simple as that. It is irrelevant if a client allows lower fees if the majority of the forgers don't.
Quote
Another way is to set very low fee right now, but doesn't increase transactions limit in block (255 for now). So in future users will fight for place in block, setting higher fees.
But very low fee in present time can hurt forgers.

I agree. Let's do it slowly.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:39:50 PM
 #29807

We only get the result from the forger. That's a result of having a turing-complete language. You cannot prove what the script is going to calculate.

This statement is wrong.
MarvellousMutant
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:40:46 PM
 #29808

I altered my mind. I think 0.1 NxT fee is good for now. Everything else can be decided by voting.

ImmortAlex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:41:31 PM
 #29809

Fixed a critical bug. Everybody should upgrade immediately.
So my paranoia wake up.

What is the bug?! Do I need to decompile pair of sources and do diff and than do analyse just before upgrade?
Do you try to hide something from evil hackers? I think they are first who do analysis on decompiled sources...
msin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1004


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:42:51 PM
 #29810

Fee: 1.0
Until we really have high price for 1 NXT.
Until we really have big number of transactions per block.
Until we really start to scream: "WTF, I buy one gram of blow cheap cheneese smartphone and need to pay 5% of it's price as fee!"

Exactly, my thoughts. Would also like a % of transaction's amount to be spent as fee with min 1NXT.

Reducing Nxt fee lowers incentive to forge with large Nxt account, while at the same time encouraging use of Nxt features. I like it.

Why not waiting for a month or two? Why the hurry?

Cause we need more people using Nxt, not forging for profit.
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:43:01 PM
 #29811

We only get the result from the forger. That's a result of having a turing-complete language. You cannot prove what the script is going to calculate.

This statement is wrong.

Ah, really? What do we have instead?
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:44:12 PM
 #29812

Fixed a critical bug. Everybody should upgrade immediately.
So my paranoia wake up.

What is the bug?! Do I need to decompile pair of sources and do diff and than do analyse just before upgrade?
Do you try to hide something from evil hackers? I think they are first who do analysis on decompiled sources...

Don't waste ur time, it will be fully disclosed anyway.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:44:40 PM
 #29813

We only get the result from the forger. That's a result of having a turing-complete language. You cannot prove what the script is going to calculate.

This statement is wrong.

Ah, really? What do we have instead?

Every node will run the script by itself.
ImmortAlex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:44:50 PM
 #29814

given that it looks like the system as designed supports only 2 decimal places.  A decompile shows getBalance methods using some integer casting operations being divided by 100L.
Yes. And AFAIR situation was even worse at least in 0.4.7: transactions and fees was integer numbers, and account balance too, but 100 times higher.
ImmortAlex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:46:17 PM
 #29815

Fee: 1.0
Until we really have high price for 1 NXT.
Until we really have big number of transactions per block.
Until we really start to scream: "WTF, I buy one gram of blow cheap cheneese smartphone and need to pay 5% of it's price as fee!"

Exactly, my thoughts. Would also like a % of transaction's amount to be spent as fee with min 1NXT.

Reducing Nxt fee lowers incentive to forge with large Nxt account, while at the same time encouraging use of Nxt features. I like it.

Why not waiting for a month or two? Why the hurry?

Cause we need more people using Nxt, not forging for profit.
Do you think that 1 NXT fee is something that really stops people now?! C'mon, it's just few cents!
ImmortAlex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:47:05 PM
 #29816

Fixed a critical bug. Everybody should upgrade immediately.
So my paranoia wake up.

What is the bug?! Do I need to decompile pair of sources and do diff and than do analyse just before upgrade?
Do you try to hide something from evil hackers? I think they are first who do analysis on decompiled sources...

Don't waste ur time, it will be fully disclosed anyway.
I go to sleep, but my paranoia is not.
BitcoinForumator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:47:19 PM
 #29817

Fee: 1.0
Until we really have high price for 1 NXT.
Until we really have big number of transactions per block.
Until we really start to scream: "WTF, I buy one gram of blow cheap cheneese smartphone and need to pay 5% of it's price as fee!"

Exactly, my thoughts. Would also like a % of transaction's amount to be spent as fee with min 1NXT.

Reducing Nxt fee lowers incentive to forge with large Nxt account, while at the same time encouraging use of Nxt features. I like it.

Why not waiting for a month or two? Why the hurry?

Cause we need more people using Nxt, not forging for profit.
Do you think that 1 NXT fee is something that really stops people now?! C'mon, it's just few cents!

It isn't in $ valuation. But in NXT terms it "seems" a lot.
msin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1004


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:47:32 PM
 #29818

Fee: 1.0
Until we really have high price for 1 NXT.
Until we really have big number of transactions per block.
Until we really start to scream: "WTF, I buy one gram of blow cheap cheneese smartphone and need to pay 5% of it's price as fee!"

Exactly, my thoughts. Would also like a % of transaction's amount to be spent as fee with min 1NXT.

Reducing Nxt fee lowers incentive to forge with large Nxt account, while at the same time encouraging use of Nxt features. I like it.

Why not waiting for a month or two? Why the hurry?

Cause we need more people using Nxt, not forging for profit.
Do you think that 1 NXT fee is something that really stops people now?! C'mon, it's just few cents!

For someone who can only afford 1000 Nxt, yes.
EmoneyRu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 600
Merit: 500

Nxt-kit developer


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:47:55 PM
 #29819

Cause we need more people using Nxt, not forging for profit.

Forging works only for stakeholders. Why should we care about them?

Idea: don't use Nxt for chat because in April there will be a fork with infinite coins. CXT, MXT, whatsnxt, facenxt, nxtwitter.

ChuckOne
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 05:48:04 PM
 #29820

Cause we need more people using Nxt, not forging for profit.

I agree.

But, come on, NXT is two months old. Don't push it too hard.

I think the concept should convince people to come and to stay not the fees. If they stay, good. If they don't because of the fees, they will leave at the slightest problem. Let's accumulate those people first and then let people in that are just here for 'yet-another-altcoin' profit.

Don't you thing we have still some time?
Pages: « 1 ... 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 [1491] 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!