msin
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
 |
February 11, 2014, 05:02:54 PM |
|
I have a hard time believing that anything makes you overly excited.  Believe me - if I get overly excited by Nxt then I think all of you would have already become very rich.  Well, let's work on that! Anyway, are cross chain transactions even possible? I would think that this could be solved on the client level, if someone were to develop a client that implements multiple coins (BTC, LTC, Nxt), loading BTC, LTC, Nxt blockchains into client (I know that would take some time), then you could trade BTC/Nxt within client and confirmations could happen within client. Doesn't seem like that would be very difficult. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:03:37 PM |
|
It's a good opportunity to test Nxt Improvement Proposal workflow.
Agreed - would you mind to be the first to have a go at this (I don't feel I know the code well enough to do this myself)? I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled. |
|
|
|
|
|
swartzfeger
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:07:15 PM |
|
I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled.
Approved.  |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:08:20 PM |
|
Screenshoots?
Please just post links rather than screenshots - it makes my head dizzy with the web page jumping up and down all the time (oh - now my post looks bad after reading the one above).  ROFL |
|
|
|
|
abctc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1025
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:08:40 PM |
|
may i have some testNXT please
17567379695603145590
- 10k sent. |
██████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ |
, the Next platform. Magis quam Moneta (More than a Coin) |
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1075
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:09:47 PM |
|
Anyway, are cross chain transactions even possible?
As far as I know they are ( https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Atomic_cross-chain_trading), however, the problem of "malleable" transactions that has recently come to light might screw this up as far as the refund txs go (that needs to be researched). Also although theoretically the information about doing this looks fine I've yet to find an example of anyone "actually having done it" which means that it is at best an "unproven idea". |
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:10:42 PM |
|
If you are involved in testing the decentralized asset exchange than come over to this thread. It'll help to keep things more organized i think. I know i have lots of questions and i don't want to flood this thread with them. Im sure others are in a similar situation. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=460343 |
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited? |
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1075
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:11:46 PM |
|
I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled.
Hmm.. don't tell me... "a vote". |
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:13:39 PM |
|
I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled.
Hmm.. don't tell me... "a vote". Actually I don't know how the community will solve the problem of approval. Watching... |
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:15:23 PM |
|
I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled.
Approved. Swartzfeger approved so what are you waiting for? |
|
|
|
jenya-les12
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:15:59 PM |
|
have about 49k testnxt.feel free 2 PM me
your captain J
|
|
|
|
|
|
BloodyRookie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:18:16 PM |
|
3rd party could add a number equal to Curve25519 group order to create a valid transaction with another id. That's how DoctorEvil hacked Nxt to replay a transaction.
Also the legit owner of a transaction could generate zillions of valid signatures for the same set of data.
Aha - my math lets me down unfortunately but I do get your point. So is there any way you think that this could be solved? Easily. We just need ID_2 that is calculated like ID but with signature bytes set back to zeros. The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember. |
Nothing Else Matters
NEM: NALICE-LGU3IV-Y4DPJK-HYLSSV-YFFWYS-5QPLYE-ZDJJ
NXT: 11095639652683007953
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1075
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:18:49 PM |
|
Actually I don't know how the community will solve the problem of approval. Watching...
Okay - then "approved" from me also! |
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1075
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:20:19 PM |
|
The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember.
The problem is whether a different hash can apply to essentially "the same" tx (apparently at the moment - it can). |
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:20:36 PM |
|
The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember.
It includes signature bytes. |
|
|
|
|
|
wesleyh
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:20:44 PM |
|
Actually I don't know how the community will solve the problem of approval. Watching...
Okay - then "approved" from me also! +1 don't know anyone who would be against that, unless there is a downside that you haven't yet shared? |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:22:31 PM |
|
+1 don't know anyone who would be against that, unless there is a downside that you haven't yet shared?
The point is to develop a workflow for a NIP approval. |
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1075
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:23:36 PM |
|
The point is to develop a workflow for a NIP approval.
I think we're doing that just right now. |
|
|
|
|
Mistafreeze
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:23:55 PM |
|
Being Android device myself, I'm often confuses with human gender identity. Only boobs IRL can help me. Have someone good boobs asset?
(.)(.) (_)_)|||||||||||||Ð~~~  ಠ_ಠ <|> /ω\ |
|
|
|
|
msin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 11, 2014, 05:26:23 PM |
|
The point is to develop a workflow for a NIP approval.
I think we're doing that just right now. +1 Approved. |
|
|
|
|
|
