Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 11:57:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Would Anyone try a group rental?  (Read 3600 times)
ezeminer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1118

Lie down. Have a cookie


View Profile
February 27, 2015, 07:47:05 AM
 #1

It sounds crazy but would anyone want to try a group rental?
I was only wondering since miningrigrentals has a 500TH, well sorta looking thing, that is up for rental.
500TH
Other 500TH
400TH

If people would want to buy shares to have it aimed at a solo pool.
Shares could be percentage wise of the total cost, as well as total payout.

Escrowed for sure, by someone willing to collaborate or do work.

1715342275
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715342275

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715342275
Reply with quote  #2

1715342275
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715342275
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715342275

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715342275
Reply with quote  #2

1715342275
Report to moderator
1715342275
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715342275

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715342275
Reply with quote  #2

1715342275
Report to moderator
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7864


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2015, 08:10:17 PM
 #2

not cost effective.

nicehash has a fixed contract much cheaper.

your link wants 300th minimum    so a  1 day contract  cost 3.99 btc

nicehash will do 50th  1 day fixed  for  .55 btc   it is a little cheaper and no escrow to worry about.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
ezeminer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1118

Lie down. Have a cookie


View Profile
March 01, 2015, 08:28:00 PM
 #3

not cost effective.

nicehash has a fixed contract much cheaper.

your link wants 300th minimum    so a  1 day contract  cost 3.99 btc

nicehash will do 50th  1 day fixed  for  .55 btc   it is a little cheaper and no escrow to worry about.
Thanks for the information philip!

lowbander80
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 03, 2015, 07:21:26 AM
 #4

group rental and mine solo yes but no real reason to do it
if someone want to play with solo mining just mines or rents for himself...
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 2300


View Profile
March 04, 2015, 01:04:12 AM
 #5

All three of your offers have an asking price of 0.01330 BTC per TH/s per day. However 4% PPS would result in a payment of 0.01034174 BTC per TH/s per day. The total hash rate of all of the offers you posted do not have a high enough of a hash rate for it to make sense to try to solomine (if you did then you would be buying very expensive lottery tickets), so you would need to point them at a pool. In order for these rentals to be profitable for you, the pool you have the rented mining power pointed to would need to have at least 128% luck over the time you have the hash rate rented for, which is very high.

This might make more sense if you can get the owner to lower their asking price to closer to a price that works out to 100% luck, and hopefully the pool you point them to would have good luck on the day you rent them. 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!