And fontas twitter is now gone.
NY times article connects @fontase with BTC-E and 1FCzmB3DhsuzBSM4wKcfJoTLRAvMARRuXM connects @FontasBTC with BTC-E's hot wallet.
Thus I am suggesting that @Fontase IS @FontasBTC, despite @Fontase's denial. See?
If the 1FC... address itself, is a BTCe deposit address, then there is nothing in itself suspicious about a transaction connecting it with the hot wallet, see?
This isn't proof.
I have also given out my deposit address to an exchange when I didn't want to wait to launch my client and wait for the block chain to catch up.
You haven't given any evidence to suggest that 1FC address isn't a deposit address, and is instead, an address in his own wallet.dat, while the transaction going from the 1FC address, directly to what is assumed to be BTCe's hot wallet, carries more weight to suggest that the 1FC address is a deposit address, and not one of his personal ones.
In fact, as I think about it more, giving out the deposit address directly, is the smarter move for a scammer, since the coin doesn't touch the personal wallet, makes it easier to launder.
I said earlier that I'm not saying you're wrong about both names being the same person. I am in no position to say so either way.
All I'm saying, is that you lack the evidence to support your suspicion at this point. Certainly not enough to prove it to a 3rd party.
I agree with you completely. It makes sense if that address he gave is just a deposit address.
