Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 04:02:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: New SHA Functions Boost Crypto On 64-bit Chips  (Read 2412 times)
kseistrup (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 566
Merit: 500


Unselfish actions pay back better


View Profile WWW
February 19, 2011, 05:49:54 PM
 #1

The topic “New SHA Functions Boost Crypto On 64-bit Chips” was posted on Slashdot, and is talking about FIPS 180-4.  I haven't been able to retrieve the PDF from CSRC, but the summary caught my attention:

Quote
Draft FIPS 180-4 adds a general procedure for creating an initialization hash value and two additional secure hash algorithms: SHA-512/224 and SHA-512/256, and removes a requirement that padding must be done before hash computation begins. SHA-512/224 and SHA-512/256 may be more efficient alternatives to SHA-224 and SHA-256, respectively, on platforms that are optimized for 64-bit operations.

Does anyone know if SHA-512/256 produces the same digests as SHA256?  If so, the alleged efficiency might be interesting for CPU-miners on 64-bit platforms.

Anyone?

Cheers,

Klaus Alexander Seistrup
1715356974
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715356974

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715356974
Reply with quote  #2

1715356974
Report to moderator
1715356974
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715356974

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715356974
Reply with quote  #2

1715356974
Report to moderator
1715356974
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715356974

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715356974
Reply with quote  #2

1715356974
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Hal
VIP
Sr. Member
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 314
Merit: 3853



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 06:19:12 PM
 #2

Does anyone know if SHA-512/256 produces the same digests as SHA256?  If so, the alleged efficiency might be interesting for CPU-miners on 64-bit platforms.

No, it would not.

Hal Finney
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!