Bitcoin Forum
September 27, 2018, 10:33:32 PM *
News: ♦♦ New info! Bitcoin Core users absolutely must upgrade to previously-announced 0.16.3 [Torrent]. All Bitcoin users should temporarily trust confirmations slightly less. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: This is circulating among net-sec specialists...  (Read 2962 times)
Sukrim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1002


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 01:59:47 PM
 #21

Exactly, it is not even difficult to do and just not doing it in public (making people aware of the fact that it can be done) does NOT mean in any way that it won't be done in private. Proper blockchain analysis tools would for example have shown pirateat40s scams much earlier or even prevented them.

Bitcoin is not anonymous (even though a lot of people act like it is) and this is increasingly becoming a problem. As said, unless there are proper tools out there that demonstrate to anyone how easily their payment to Wikileaks can be has been traced (this has been done YEARS ago!) there won't be much incentive to make Bitcoin more secure against deanonymisation.

Even ignoring the case that 2 TXINs does not 100% mean that 1 person owns both addresses, just looking at clusters like "Bitstamp customers" or "MtGox customers" will probably have much more data inherent than some people might expect.

Thanks for the link by the way, I took another look at neo4j because of it. Unfortunately there still seems to be no real way for time-coded data in there (I found https://github.com/ccattuto/neo4j-dynagraph/wiki/Representing-time-dependent-graphs-in-Neo4j which maybe even has been used in this project...) which is a pity - a lot of data is strongly time dependent.

https://www.coinlend.org <-- automated lending at various exchanges. No fees(!).
Mail me at Bitmessage: BM-BbiHiVv5qh858ULsyRDtpRrG9WjXN3xf
1538087612
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538087612

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538087612
Reply with quote  #2

1538087612
Report to moderator
1538087612
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538087612

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538087612
Reply with quote  #2

1538087612
Report to moderator
1538087612
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538087612

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538087612
Reply with quote  #2

1538087612
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1538087612
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538087612

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538087612
Reply with quote  #2

1538087612
Report to moderator
1538087612
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538087612

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538087612
Reply with quote  #2

1538087612
Report to moderator
Dabs
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1104



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 03:48:35 PM
 #22

I meant mining brand new coins, plus whatever transaction fees are there. You don't attempt to pay yourself your own transaction fees, not unless you have lots of hash power.

Brand new coins are clean. Attempting to trace where they came from is going to be difficult, if not impossible as the block could have been relayed by anyone. Or good luck to whoever is tracking where new blocks come from.

Now, if you're part of a mining pool, that's another story. Still possible to be mostly anonymous, as most pools don't ask for any real info. They just want your workers and hash power and take 1% to 2% as pool fee.

Escrow Service (Services) - GPG ID: 32AD7565, OTC ID: Dabs
All messages concerning escrow or with bitcoin addresses are GPG signed. Please verify.
CompTIA A+, Microsoft Certified Professional, MCSA: Windows 10; Windows Server 2012, MCSE: Cloud Platform and Infrastructure; Productivity; Messaging
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!