Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 02:20:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Modeling the Historical Price of Bitcoin Long w/ sincx Morlet Wavelets... help?  (Read 1375 times)
litepresence (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 358
Merit: 118


View Profile
December 10, 2013, 05:36:56 AM
 #1

Google Keyword this expression:


100(1.01^x)+(90sin(x)+20sin(1.1x^2)+8sin(x^3))*(5*(((1.5)/(2(3.14)))^(1/2))*(2.77^((-1.5)/((2)*(x+0)))/((x+0)^(1/2))*(2.77^-((3.14)*(.12(x-.5))^2)



**zoom out**


roughly price in dollars and time in days beginning w/ April 2013 and "expecting" another parabolic event.


I posted that in the trollbox archive at btce after the April crash.   Seems we got another "parabolic event" Smiley

Thoughts?


Would like to build a model which includes April 2013 event, Dec 2013, and Aug 2012.

Any takers to help approximate?



Please post equations.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morlet_wavelet
Quote
Morlet wavelet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In mathematics, the Morlet wavelet (or Gabor wavelet)[1] is a wavelet composed of a complex exponential (carrier) multiplied by a Gaussian window (envelope). This wavelet is closely related to human perception, both hearing[2] and vision.[3]

In 1946, physicist Dennis Gabor, applying ideas from quantum physics, introduced the use of Gaussian-windowed sinusoids for time-frequency decomposition, which he referred to as atoms, and which provide the best trade-off between spatial and frequency resolution.[1] These are used in the Gabor transform, a type of short-time Fourier transform.[2] In 1984, Jean Morlet introduced Gabor's work to the seismology community and, with Goupillaud and Grossmann, modified it to keep the same wavelet shape over equal octave intervals, resulting in the first formalization of the continuous wavelet transform.[4] (See also Wavelet history)
1714746018
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714746018

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714746018
Reply with quote  #2

1714746018
Report to moderator
1714746018
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714746018

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714746018
Reply with quote  #2

1714746018
Report to moderator
1714746018
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714746018

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714746018
Reply with quote  #2

1714746018
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714746018
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714746018

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714746018
Reply with quote  #2

1714746018
Report to moderator
1714746018
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714746018

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714746018
Reply with quote  #2

1714746018
Report to moderator
Desensitizer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 10, 2013, 08:11:43 AM
 #2

I don't think that the graph really fits. I know it would be sweet to try and find a magic formula to predict pricing trends but I personally believe the market is just very volatile and it makes the graph go a little nuts as a result. The trollboxes, numerous exchanges with slightly different currencies, and technical difficulties also are contributors to the hard to lay an equation to nature of bitcoin pricing trends.
knightcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


Stand on the shoulders of giants


View Profile
December 10, 2013, 12:46:24 PM
 #3

I've been played a little bit with "Agent-based model" ...

You can try http://www.altreva.com/ , you can import cvs historical data and run simulations ..

Wink

http://www.introversion.co.uk/
mit/x11 licence 18.x/16|o|3ffe ::71
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!