Bitcoin Forum
April 16, 2024, 06:19:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 2013-12-12 Wired - U.S. Government Nastygram Shuts Down One-Man Bitcoin Mint  (Read 6185 times)
No_2 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 901
Merit: 1031


BTC: the beginning of stake-based public resources


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 03:44:29 PM
 #1

Nooooooooooo!

http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/12/casascius/

Quote
Mike Caldwell spent years turning digital currency into physical coins. That may sound like a paradox. But it’s true. He takes bitcoins — the world’s most popular digital currency — and then he mints them here in the physical world. If you added up all the bitcoins Caldwell has minted on behalf his customers, they would be worth about $82 million.

...

Just before Thanksgiving, he says, he received a letter from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FINCEN, the arm of the Treasury Department that dictates how the nation’s anti-money-laundering and financial crime regulations are interpreted. According to FINCEN, Caldwell needs to rethink his business. “They considered my activity to be money transmitting,” Caldwell says. And if you want to transmit money, you must first jump through a lot of state and federal regulatory hoops Caldwell hasn’t jumped through.

...

Mike: what a pain.

1713291581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713291581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713291581
Reply with quote  #2

1713291581
Report to moderator
1713291581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713291581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713291581
Reply with quote  #2

1713291581
Report to moderator
1713291581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713291581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713291581
Reply with quote  #2

1713291581
Report to moderator
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713291581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713291581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713291581
Reply with quote  #2

1713291581
Report to moderator
1713291581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713291581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713291581
Reply with quote  #2

1713291581
Report to moderator
1713291581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713291581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713291581
Reply with quote  #2

1713291581
Report to moderator
Rygon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 03:50:45 PM
 #2

So sad.  Cry
I_bitcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 04:16:28 PM
 #3

Sorry for Mike Sad.   That said, he did not seem overly upset when last he spoke about this.   

No matter where you go, there you are.
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3071



View Profile
December 12, 2013, 04:17:11 PM
 #4

If they can construe Mike Caldwell's business as unlicensed money transmitting, then all bitcoin miners and users can by an extension of the same logic be considered to be the more guilty parties (and possibly businesses that post any precious metals in coin form). Users and miners are doing the deed directly, without any regulation or license :O Casascius is very much the lesser infringer, as they use the postal service to send people wallet access that is protected by a hologram housed in a coin.

So FinCEN have basically gone after an easy target because of the unique nature of his business, and what's more is that it's a business whose activity least resembles the transgression that they have charged Casascius with. Sending someone cash or a cheque in the post should also be considered money transmitting in this case. Hell, why not just simply giving people bank notes? Money is transmitted, no?

Vires in numeris
I_bitcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 04:49:22 PM
 #5

If they can construe Mike Caldwell's business as unlicensed money transmitting, then all bitcoin miners and users can by an extension of the same logic be considered to be the more guilty parties (and possibly businesses that post any precious metals in coin form). Users and miners are doing the deed directly, without any regulation or license :O Casascius is very much the lesser infringer, as they use the postal service to send people wallet access that is protected by a hologram housed in a coin.

So FinCEN have basically gone after an easy target because of the unique nature of his business, and what's more is that it's a business whose activity least resembles the transgression that they have charged Casascius with. Sending someone cash or a cheque in the post should also be considered money transmitting in this case. Hell, why not just simply giving people bank notes? Money is transmitted, no?

The physical thing always seems get cracked down on.     It might be fun to have a 3D printer implementation of Mike's coins.   I bet he would not mind giving out some designs.   This way anyone can print them at a whim Smiley.

No matter where you go, there you are.
solex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


100 satoshis -> ISO code


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 06:44:24 PM
 #6

Mike did a fantastic job of getting Bitcoin into the mainstream. The photos of his physical coins are everywhere and much more advanced-looking than any ordinary coin.

Eventually, I expect the Smithsonian will be wanting one to put on display.

Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 07:09:09 PM
 #7

This is why we need bitcoin.

Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3071



View Profile
December 12, 2013, 07:16:58 PM
 #8

Mike did a fantastic job of getting Bitcoin into the mainstream. The photos of his physical coins are everywhere and much more advanced-looking than any ordinary coin.

Eventually, I expect the Smithsonian will be wanting one to put on display.


Criminalising the business of a person who's played a historic role, that will be cited in articles and exhibitions for perhaps many years to come? I guess that is what this amounts to, yeah. A Casascius coin is already featured in a display at the British Museum. This is pretty poor behaviour from FinCEN.

Vires in numeris
David M
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 07:20:17 PM
 #9

This is disgusting.

Get out of the USA as fast as you can Mike.

They do not deserve you.
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 07:31:12 PM
 #10

So now if i make a physical wow gold coin i am a money transmitter?

ercolinux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2013, 07:34:16 PM
 #11

It's a pity, the coins of Casascius are a true bitcoin icon  Undecided

I don't know american law but maybe the problem could be that he sell gold and silver coin too?

Bitrated user: ercolinux.
TitanBTC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366
Merit: 258



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2013, 07:39:53 PM
 #12

A few people have forwarded this to me and asked for a comment, so here it is. (Sorry for being away from the forums lately, by the way)

FinCEN is a regulator, so they are going to try to regulate whatever they can.  They sent Mike a letter to say, "we think we'd like to regulate you."  He has the option to say, "No thanks" and let them pursue legal action against him.  In my opinion, Mike could probably win a court case defending his non-MSB status, but it would be a landmark ruling and a huge expense to undertake.  

For Titan Mint, We registered as an MSB because we want to accept dollars and make it convenient for everyday people to buy and get into bitcoin.  We planned to comply with FinCEN's AML/KYC policies from the beginning.  If bitcoin is a "currency", these types of situations are going to keep appearing as the legacy regulatory systems catch up to the constant influx of innovative business that build on the bitcoin protocol.  

Money laundering is real, and it's a real problem.  While this type of thing is a huge pain for the innovators in the bitcoin space, there is a kernel of "good" in FinCEN's mission statement.  It's definitely not for everyone, but some of us are willing to stick it out and work with the regulators in order to bring them up to speed on the future of money.  I completely respect the separatists in bitcoin who want to distance bitcoin from the existing systems.  There's a place for everyone in this community and we'll all add value in our own ways.  The work that is being done to make inroads with the existing financial establishment can serve to make bitcoin and its digital offspring much stronger.  If it doesn't though, we can always just move to a different blockchain.

Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3071



View Profile
December 12, 2013, 08:15:39 PM
 #13

The work that is being done to make inroads with the existing financial establishment can serve to make bitcoin and its digital offspring much stronger.  If it doesn't though, we can always just move to a different blockchain.

Good luck with that chain, it's not the one the rest of the world will be using. And the genuinely freedom oriented coins will trade at a higher premium too, you guys will be stuck with the inferior money.

Vires in numeris
bitcool
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1441
Merit: 1000

Live and enjoy experiments


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 08:35:49 PM
 #14

Setup a shop and sell it from Canada.
ajax3592
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Crypto News & Tutorials - Coinramble.com


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 08:43:47 PM
 #15

That's sad to hear. I saw some pictues of 1000BTC physical coin by Casascius that goat auctioned.

So, what is this supposed to do to the value of existing Casascius coins, will their value increase or decrease.

Crypto news/tutorials >>CoinRamble<<                            >>Netcodepool<<                >>My graphics<<
jones31
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 08:55:58 PM
 #16

So now if i make a physical wow gold coin i am a money transmitter?
If you start selling them , yes.
Also , another requirement is that you have to live in good old USA.
bitbouillion
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 12, 2013, 11:09:03 PM
 #17

So now if I make a physical cookie dough coin I am a money transmitter?

marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 11:13:17 PM
 #18

If this is the 'light regulation" then USA is fucked as place to do bitcoin business ... watch what they do not what they say.

Edit: btw Mike you are great entrepreneur, I suggest a move to Switzerland might be a good option for you.

e521
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 11:27:47 PM
 #19

well, this is unexpected after the Senate hearing, I thought US was going to facilitate bitcoin related businesses up to a certain level.
casascius is well recognized from the community and I believe he is not part of any money laundering action.
he should move to another country and continue minting really, maybe canada is the best choice

dave111223
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2013, 01:06:09 AM
 #20

If no, then Casascius may be able to sell the coins unloaded, for fiat or bitcoin.  I would pay for an unloaded coin and then just load it myself.

Good point, what's stopping him just selling unloaded coins?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!