Bitcoin Forum
April 22, 2024, 11:27:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 ... 129 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC]  (Read 281316 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1030



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:00:13 PM
 #1341

Thanks for addressing this.

Tired on source posted as of 30 minutes ago, I still get the same thing... 32mb per thread added to vmem every time the CPU dips (not exactly sure what's happening, probably finished with old work and starting new work?)

Okay, thanks - so if you're just running 1 thread, on each iteration, it's adding 32mb?
and if you're running 32 threads, it's adding 32x32mb = 1GB each iteration?

Membercoin - Layer 1 Coin used for the member.cash decentralized social network.
10% Interest On All Balances. Browser and Solo Mining. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
1713828429
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713828429

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713828429
Reply with quote  #2

1713828429
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713828429
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713828429

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713828429
Reply with quote  #2

1713828429
Report to moderator
montecristo83
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:01:08 PM
 #1342

Maybe a stupid question... Will this coin be listed on any cryptocurrency exchange someday? Is there any info or assumption on when will it happen and what the price might be?
This coin has better features than a lot of the (cloned) coins already listed on the various exchanges. I don't see why it shouldn't get added to an exchange.

It sure was the right choice to re-adjust the fork. But block 607? A higher block number would have given everyone a bit more time to react.
I think the sooner the better. That's just my personal opinion though.

He announced the fork yesterday, and pushed it forward since it seemed like we were gonna be stuck for a very long time at a certain block. Surely the same would happen with more than one of about 150 blocks.
giveBTCpls
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:06:48 PM
 #1343

Is this still as useless to mine as it was when it launched? any pools yet? or any place to buy some?? This seems like yet again another 1% scenareo where only people with NASA tier computers are getting coins.

montecristo83
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:11:02 PM
 #1344

Is this still as useless to mine as it was when it launched? any pools yet? or any place to buy some?? This seems like yet again another 1% scenareo where only people with NASA tier computers are getting coins.
A recent fork sorted out the excessive difficulty fluctuations.

You can buy/sell in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=373396.0
Snard
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:13:18 PM
 #1345

Is the block stuck at 612?
ryen123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:15:36 PM
 #1346

Is the block stuck at 612?

It is currently block 639

skwinx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:20:14 PM
 #1347

bitcoind: db/version_set.cc:715: leveldb::VersionSet::~VersionSet(): Assertion `dummy_versions_.next_ == &dummy_versions_' failed.

I have experienced this many times...........
jeroenn13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:24:37 PM
 #1348

Yay. Block found =)

280 MMC for sale, PM your offers.

..bustadice..         ▄▄████████████▄▄
     ▄▄████████▀▀▀▀████████▄▄
   ▄███████████    ███████████▄
  █████    ████▄▄▄▄████    █████
 ██████    ████████▀▀██    ██████
██████████████████   █████████████
█████████████████▌  ▐█████████████
███    ██████████   ███████    ███
███    ████████▀   ▐███████    ███
██████████████      ██████████████
██████████████      ██████████████
 ██████████████▄▄▄▄██████████████
  ▀████████████████████████████▀
                     ▄▄███████▄▄
                  ▄███████████████▄
   ███████████  ▄████▀▀       ▀▀████▄
               ████▀      ██     ▀████
 ███████████  ████        ██       ████
             ████         ██        ████
███████████  ████     ▄▄▄▄██        ████
             ████     ▀▀▀▀▀▀        ████
 ███████████  ████                 ████
               ████▄             ▄████
   ███████████  ▀████▄▄       ▄▄████▀
                  ▀███████████████▀
                     ▀▀███████▀▀
           ▄██▄
           ████
            ██
            ▀▀
 ▄██████████████████████▄
██████▀▀██████████▀▀██████
█████    ████████    █████
█████▄  ▄████████▄  ▄█████
██████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
       ████████████
......Play......
Rubick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:27:52 PM
 #1349

Is the block stuck at 612?

You'll have to delete your blockchain, update your Client and redownload the Blockchain.
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1030



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:31:57 PM
 #1350

bitcoind: db/version_set.cc:715: leveldb::VersionSet::~VersionSet(): Assertion `dummy_versions_.next_ == &dummy_versions_' failed.

I have experienced this many times...........

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1449.new#new

Membercoin - Layer 1 Coin used for the member.cash decentralized social network.
10% Interest On All Balances. Browser and Solo Mining. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
giveBTCpls
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:38:48 PM
 #1351

Is this still as useless to mine as it was when it launched? any pools yet? or any place to buy some?? This seems like yet again another 1% scenareo where only people with NASA tier computers are getting coins.
A recent fork sorted out the excessive difficulty fluctuations.

You can buy/sell in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=373396.0

So how many NMC per day can I make mining at 0.4??

skwinx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:40:01 PM
 #1352

bitcoind: db/version_set.cc:715: leveldb::VersionSet::~VersionSet(): Assertion `dummy_versions_.next_ == &dummy_versions_' failed.

I have experienced this many times...........

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1449.new#new

yes, I hava rm the .memorycoin can be OK, but wait a period of time, will go wrong.
radiumsoup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356
Merit: 255


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:43:15 PM
 #1353

Okay, can you try uncommenting (latest source) lines 136, 137

      //CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data();
      //EVP_cleanup();

and  271, 272

      //CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data();
      //EVP_cleanup();

Let me know if that helps please.
Thanks for addressing this.

Tired on source posted as of 30 minutes ago, I still get the same thing... 32mb per thread added to vmem every time the CPU dips (not exactly sure what's happening, probably finished with old work and starting new work?)
actually, this sometimes (!?) breaks ssl with "context: unable to load ssl2 md5 routines". reverting to commented.

PGP fingerprint:   0x85beeabd110803b93d408b502d39b8875b282f86
radiumsoup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356
Merit: 255


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:43:30 PM
 #1354

Thanks for addressing this.

Tired on source posted as of 30 minutes ago, I still get the same thing... 32mb per thread added to vmem every time the CPU dips (not exactly sure what's happening, probably finished with old work and starting new work?)

Okay, thanks - so if you're just running 1 thread, on each iteration, it's adding 32mb?
and if you're running 32 threads, it's adding 32x32mb = 1GB each iteration?
correct.

PGP fingerprint:   0x85beeabd110803b93d408b502d39b8875b282f86
montecristo83
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 04:54:17 PM
 #1355

Is this still as useless to mine as it was when it launched? any pools yet? or any place to buy some?? This seems like yet again another 1% scenareo where only people with NASA tier computers are getting coins.
A recent fork sorted out the excessive difficulty fluctuations.

You can buy/sell in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=373396.0

So how many NMC per day can I make mining at 0.4??

Namecoin? 0. Cheesy

In all seriousness, I have no idea. But what I do know is that 0.4 hpm is very low, so unless you wanna roll the dice and try to get lucky; wait for a pool.
giveBTCpls
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 05:16:00 PM
 #1356

Is this still as useless to mine as it was when it launched? any pools yet? or any place to buy some?? This seems like yet again another 1% scenareo where only people with NASA tier computers are getting coins.
A recent fork sorted out the excessive difficulty fluctuations.

You can buy/sell in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=373396.0

So how many NMC per day can I make mining at 0.4??

Namecoin? 0. Cheesy

In all seriousness, I have no idea. But what I do know is that 0.4 hpm is very low, so unless you wanna roll the dice and try to get lucky; wait for a pool.

Yeah sorry, I keep saying NMC.
Please someone make a pool soon, this is useless.

chip99
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 05:19:23 PM
 #1357

i think i found a block but i didnt got it . it showed 280 MMC.  my client is in german  it showed the mmc under a third tab that i never saw before called "unreif"  . so it was not under balance or unverfied. so i guess it was a  orphaned block and its lost ? im using newest version. after i restarted client everything was normal again and just 0 everywhere.

Kazahstanec
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 0



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 05:20:19 PM
 #1358

After updating and removal of peers.dat the purse isn't synchronized at all

Why? ? ? ? ?
tagusk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 05:27:22 PM
 #1359

After updating and removal of peers.dat the purse isn't synchronized at all

Why? ? ? ? ?

Same here, "No block source available" even after the addnodes mentioned.
ZKRiNG
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 05:42:48 PM
 #1360

Finally it works? or still same as 2 days ago?

Ɖ: D5b1ZAM3SodS7p1o2h6Wk74D9My4HVynYy || ฿ : 1FdWjXRdtk6GghmmHN5MFvrQgcatR1Mjx3
Ł: LTuqhfA2VJcC5d5ZQGX3pR3C8Ku4P51nHH     || Ψ: AaHkji4brP26Yfs84GPp1RZ9a5mUiPL4bY
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 ... 129 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!