|
pat25 (OP)
|
 |
May 12, 2018, 09:50:29 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
The Cryptovator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 2170
Need PR/CMC & CG? TG @The_Cryptovator
|
|
May 13, 2018, 05:45:13 AM |
|
I think this is not enough proof. Try to gather more proof. And edit your thread with more proof. Specially need to match eth address or transaction made between them.
|
|
|
|
HCP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4316
<insert witty quote here>
|
|
May 13, 2018, 09:48:37 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 13, 2018, 09:55:14 AM |
|
Well, it requires a lot of time and skill to find some ETH transactions to prove that they are connected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 13, 2018, 09:56:26 AM |
|
Thank you, you did a great work! I hope this will be enough to tag them all  |
|
|
|
|
marlboroza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270
|
|
May 13, 2018, 11:06:06 AM |
|
Chinese -> English -> Turkish Portuguese -> Off topic farming rank in 2016 -> Turkish Accounts velho, dustinfroe and start activated on February 11. and joined DIW bounty Account tammyla activated on February 21 and joined DIW bounty(irrelevant) Accounts velho, distinfroe, start and tammyla joined Gilgamesh bounty on March 04. Accounts jedimindtricks, jari76, a83748619, w709190200 and googlemy activated on March 9. and all 9 accounts joined Docademic bounty. All 9 accounts joined Betex bounty on April 16.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 13, 2018, 06:30:32 PM |
|
Chinese -> English -> Turkish Portuguese -> Off topic farming rank in 2016 -> Turkish Accounts velho, dustinfroe and start activated on February 11. and joined DIW bounty Account tammyla activated on February 21 and joined DIW bounty(irrelevant) Accounts velho, distinfroe, start and tammyla joined Gilgamesh bounty on March 04. Accounts jedimindtricks, jari76, a83748619, w709190200 and googlemy activated on March 9. and all 9 accounts joined Docademic bounty. All 9 accounts joined Betex bounty on April 16. Thank you for your work! This have to prove that the accounts are connected. |
|
|
|
|
HCP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4316
<insert witty quote here>
|
|
May 14, 2018, 02:03:09 AM |
|
Well, it requires a lot of time and skill to find some ETH transactions to prove that they are connected.
Ain't that the truth! If I have some time, I'll have a look later tonight when I get off shift... Chinese -> English -> Turkish Portuguese -> Off topic farming rank in 2016 -> Turkish Looks like I missed a few posts... In other news... Just discovered that if you have "ignored" certainly boards, messages from those boards don't show when you view the posting history of a user!  |
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 14, 2018, 07:45:27 PM |
|
I don´t see any negative trust on their profiles... Why DT members do not care about that?
When I was interested in buying accounts, I received negative trust immediately, not that I bought any account...
|
|
|
|
|
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 3318
Merit: 6796
Cashback 15%
|
|
May 14, 2018, 08:13:02 PM |
|
I don´t see any negative trust on their profiles... Why DT members do not care about that?
When I was interested in buying accounts, I received negative trust immediately, not that I bought any account...
Well in your case, what you were asking about was blatantly obvious. Posting gaps and language changes aren't rock-solid proof. Yes, I've left people negs because of both of those things but there's always some doubt, however small, that the account was hacked or bought. In the case of this thread, I just haven't had a chance to go through these profiles to take a look for myself. I know damn well you're not actually complaining about DT members not being as efficient as you'd like them to be--you're complaining because you got tagged and not these accounts here. Stop pretending it's otherwise. |
.
.HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINO & SPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
HCP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4316
<insert witty quote here>
|
|
May 15, 2018, 03:36:02 AM
Last edit: May 15, 2018, 04:24:14 AM by HCP |
|
Ok, it would seem that at least one of these accounts might be an alt of a large scale alt-account abuser... deebttHere we see " start" inexplicably using the twitter https://twitter.com/cemaatimuslum - http://archive.is/HXzYs#selection-3313.0-3313.33 in amongst all their posts using twitter: @4yam3 This "cemaatimuslum" account seems to be the main twitter of deebtt, who has already been tagged for having some 60+ alt accounts abusing campaigns - http://archive.is/qN1sh#selection-477.0-477.33
Also, I haven't been able to find an "address" link amongst all these accounts there are some *very* complicated connections between these accounts (see below), despite them all seeming to participate in the same bounties and following the same "post gap, switch to Turkish" history pattern. It's possible they're just very organised, or they're actually just a group of individuals all joining the same campaigns. I can certainly understand why The Pharmacist is hesitant to tag them up. EDIT: Found some links between some of these accounts (but no concrete proof): ETH "distribution" account: 0xff1a971bd60b127f077028e9a1b1e58627efdabcThis account seems to be distributing small amounts (0.002) of ETH amongst all the other accounts... maybe so they can shift tokens?  ... here we find a link between: start: https://etherscan.io/address/0x0a1356257c4ded4284469f4af472590ecd59b6f8dustinfroe: https://etherscan.io/address/0x13AacA2bbA64C7EF0C8B0A08604256c770d8897djedimindtriks: https://etherscan.io/address/0x1f01cab113cccb4b848cf9a68c31dc28853d043bjari76: https://etherscan.io/address/0x4C9d7BFD195BEea55D793864A05C2821cEe06C1Bw709190200: https://etherscan.io/address/0xA18A65A22b713fE3CEdcBF34De5327c1f4Dcfa11googlemi: https://etherscan.io/address/0x749C20dA956526Eb4D749C5B9FdfFF82684FF03aas they all received payments from the "0xff1a97" address... but I can't find any links apart from that... ETH address 0x9949C7eb27e93Fd1b4Eb580C6039F4376b893764 seems to be another such distribution address... send a lot of 0.001 ETH payments out to multiple addresses like: tammyla: https://etherscan.io/address/0x892F9071429BD509EA147055Cf4B5d7705A21fecAlso... Tammyla ( 0x892F9071429BD509EA147055Cf4B5d7705A21fec) sent ETH to velho ( 0xB90E9f6303Ad691868fFe2C50eC7099cbda711FC) in this transactionHowever, none of these transactions really " proves" that they're all Alt accounts... it certainly isn't like other cases we have seen where you can see alts all sending their tokens to one collection address. Unless you can find some more concrete proof, I don't see any reason that a DT member would want to tag these guys... (except maybe "start" for being an alt of "deebtt") |
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 15, 2018, 08:43:53 AM |
|
Ohh my goot! You are awesome, how did you find so much information? You are a cryptodetective  But you and marlboroza spent a lot of time by searching informations about these accounts and still we can´t do nothing  |
|
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 21, 2018, 07:26:39 AM |
|
As you can see, it is not enough to prove that the account is bought or hacked. But I would like to know, if someone buy Legendary member, changes email, password and woke up from a long period of inactivity - it is considered as a hacked or bought account? Will you tagg the account? Because I see many tagged legendaries for this ... But member accounts are not in your interest? |
|
|
|
|
The Cryptovator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 2170
Need PR/CMC & CG? TG @The_Cryptovator
|
|
May 21, 2018, 09:00:07 AM |
|
No one will tag unless you provide eth or token transaction between them or any other strong evidences. Only registered or joined on bounty same date it dose not mean they are connected. |
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 21, 2018, 04:46:28 PM |
|
No one will tag unless you provide eth or token transaction between them or any other strong evidences. Only registered or joined on bounty same date it dose not mean they are connected. Language switch, poor quality of posts, almost same posts, only in turkish, everything is okay, right? |
|
|
|
|
HCP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4316
<insert witty quote here>
|
|
May 21, 2018, 10:06:03 PM |
|
No one will tag unless you provide eth or token transaction between them or any other strong evidences. Only registered or joined on bounty same date it dose not mean they are connected.
Language switch, poor quality of posts, almost same posts, only in turkish, everything is okay, right? Some of the evidence is fairly circumstantial... unless accounts have posted the same cryptocurrency address or external account name (telegram/facebook/twitter) from different BitcoinTalk accounts, I (personally) don't think that we can confidently say accounts are "alts" based purely on token transfers either (although some are getting tagged for it). Are token transfers suspicious? yes... are they proof of alt accounts? I'm not 100% convinced unless there is other evidence to back it up. But I would like to know, if someone buy Legendary member, changes email, password and woke up from a long period of inactivity - it is considered as a hacked or bought account? Will you tagg the account? Because I see many tagged legendaries for this ... But member accounts are not in your interest?
Things like the language switch and posting gaps etc tend to indicate an account has possibly be sold or hacked... again, isn't a definite proof. If you have absolute proof that the account was bought/sold then you'll find DT members who will tag it. |
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 26, 2018, 09:19:30 PM |
|
No one will tag unless you provide eth or token transaction between them or any other strong evidences. Only registered or joined on bounty same date it dose not mean they are connected.
Language switch, poor quality of posts, almost same posts, only in turkish, everything is okay, right? Some of the evidence is fairly circumstantial... unless accounts have posted the same cryptocurrency address or external account name (telegram/facebook/twitter) from different BitcoinTalk accounts, I (personally) don't think that we can confidently say accounts are "alts" based purely on token transfers either (although some are getting tagged for it). Are token transfers suspicious? yes... are they proof of alt accounts? I'm not 100% convinced unless there is other evidence to back it up. But I would like to know, if someone buy Legendary member, changes email, password and woke up from a long period of inactivity - it is considered as a hacked or bought account? Will you tagg the account? Because I see many tagged legendaries for this ... But member accounts are not in your interest?
Things like the language switch and posting gaps etc tend to indicate an account has possibly be sold or hacked... again, isn't a definite proof. If you have absolute proof that the account was bought/sold then you'll find DT members who will tag it. " unless accounts have posted the same cryptocurrency address or external account name (telegram/facebook/twitter) from different BitcoinTalk accounts, " This should not be taken as multiaccounting, I think that many users here posting someone else's telegram or friend´s telegram (because they do not have telegram, or they do not want to be bothered) Or they buy new twitter or facebook account. Also my blog was misused several times by another bitcointalk profile. |
|
|
|
|
HCP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4316
<insert witty quote here>
|
|
May 27, 2018, 01:30:37 AM |
|
" unless accounts have posted the same cryptocurrency address or external account name (telegram/facebook/twitter) from different BitcoinTalk accounts, "
This should not be taken as multiaccounting, I think that many users here posting someone else's telegram or friend´s telegram (because they do not have telegram, or they do not want to be bothered)
Or they buy new twitter or facebook account.
Also my blog was misused several times by another bitcointalk profile.
On it's own... maybe not for the external accounts like Twitter/FB etc... as it seems the new "scam" is to claim another users posts as your own. But it certainly would add to the level of certainty that the accounts were alts if you find instances where they are claiming the same cryptocurrency wallet address. What use would it be for a scammer to have the coins sent to some innocent guys wallet? Honestly, I'm beginning to wonder if we should even care about all this twitter/FB/Telegram campaign multi accounting... If <xyzICO> don't do their own due diligence and wants to give away <xyzCoins> to anyone that can put a name and a link in a Google Spreadsheet and start spamming (or copying) posts on Twitter/FB/Telegram... do we really care? I honestly don't see ANY of that nonsense unless people start posting reputation threads for them. I'm personally more concerned about all the shitposters in the general forums posting away for their sig campaigns... necroposting threads from 2016... adding incomprehensible google translate nonsense into discussion threads... asking the same question that has been asked (and answered) about 3246286 times etc. |
|
|
|
|
pat25 (OP)
|
|
May 27, 2018, 07:48:51 AM |
|
" unless accounts have posted the same cryptocurrency address or external account name (telegram/facebook/twitter) from different BitcoinTalk accounts, "
This should not be taken as multiaccounting, I think that many users here posting someone else's telegram or friend´s telegram (because they do not have telegram, or they do not want to be bothered)
Or they buy new twitter or facebook account.
Also my blog was misused several times by another bitcointalk profile.
I'm personally more concerned about all the shitposters in the general forums posting away for their sig campaigns... necroposting threads from 2016... adding incomprehensible google translate nonsense into discussion threads... asking the same question that has been asked (and answered) about 3246286 times etc. Well, it is because signature campaign requires some posts per week, so bounty participants have to post - they have to, they do not want and I think this is the main problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
