Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2021, 11:30:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 [139] 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 ... 200 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [SKY] Skycoin Launch Announcement  (Read 381238 times)
Relaxedsense
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 809
Merit: 1002


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 12:58:20 PM
 #2761

I think the only real solution is to burn a considerable amount, lets say 80 Million, after which only 15 million will be left over for distribution. The devs could keep a significant amount, lets say 5 mil, to fund future development.

Ideas?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1638790216
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638790216

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638790216
Reply with quote  #2

1638790216
Report to moderator
JUSTDLISK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447
Merit: 250


Bancor


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 04:59:11 PM
 #2762

I think the only real solution is to burn a considerable amount, lets say 80 Million, after which only 15 million will be left over for distribution. The devs could keep a significant amount, lets say 5 mil, to fund future development.

Ideas?

Agreed,
I would have purchased more if the distribution wasn't so rediculous,

nolispui
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 215
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 08:00:47 PM
 #2763

I think the only real solution is to burn a considerable amount, lets say 80 Million, after which only 15 million will be left over for distribution. The devs could keep a significant amount, lets say 5 mil, to fund future development.

Ideas?

I too think this is a pretty good idea
GTTIGER
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 08:07:28 PM
 #2764

I think the only real solution is to burn a considerable amount, lets say 80 Million, after which only 15 million will be left over for distribution. The devs could keep a significant amount, lets say 5 mil, to fund future development.

Ideas?

I too think this is a pretty good idea
The dev seems open to ideas. Do a thorough analysis and then post. The team hasn't had much time to think about distribution. Come back with historical examples and maybe you can change devs mind. Talking like this doesn't help cuz all investors want less supply lol

ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
April 19, 2017, 10:11:55 PM
 #2765

Visualization of Skycoin development:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gHyxomee6E

stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 03:19:17 AM
 #2766

I think the only real solution is to burn a considerable amount, lets say 80 Million, after which only 15 million will be left over for distribution. The devs could keep a significant amount, lets say 5 mil, to fund future development.

Ideas?

Agreed,
I would have purchased more if the distribution wasn't so rediculous,

Same. In fact I bought into the ICO thinking the total supply was the amount that was being sold in the ICO (I know, my mistake). But I am so far impressed by the devs responsiveness and receptiveness, they are definitely aware of our concerns. Let's wait and see what happens. Either way I am very optimistic about this project, I remember reading about it when I first joined BCT in early 2014 and I'm happy to see it is starting to come to fruition.
BitsifyOfficial
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 285
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 20, 2017, 07:34:23 AM
 #2767

Hmm yeah the distribution and Dev share is a bit on the high side. I'm sure the devs are considering something though.
huxdy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 12:56:51 PM
 #2768

I think developers are hoping to get more money
coin163
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 281


dApps Development Automation Platform


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 01:07:14 PM
 #2769

I think developers are hoping to get more money
maybe.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5245436.0

Disposable surgical Face Mask with CE, FDA Approved for sell.
FandangledGizmo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1139
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 01:24:31 PM
 #2770

Is it possible to clone? Surely people will just release the same product with more adoptable distribution?
ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
April 20, 2017, 01:39:13 PM
 #2771

Is it possible to clone? Surely people will just release the same product with more adoptable distribution?

There is still alot of development to do.

stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 05:00:35 PM
 #2772

Having issues running the wallet on windows, it just gets stuck "Loading..." any fix for this?

Also is there a way to password protect our wallets?
mladen00
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2127
Merit: 1013


K-ing®


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 05:53:28 PM
 #2773

Having issues running the wallet on windows, it just gets stuck "Loading..." any fix for this?

Also is there a way to password protect our wallets?

if you go win firewall you must add new inbound and outbund rules for skycoin

IOTA
ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
April 20, 2017, 08:57:06 PM
 #2774


I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

coinspeed
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 236
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
April 20, 2017, 09:03:11 PM
 #2775


I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

Had a great chat with ICOcountdown on telegram regarding distribution. Looking forward to developments regarding this issue.

Carry on Skycoin! Smiley

Momimaus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 767
Merit: 500

Never back down !!!


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 09:03:58 PM
 #2776


I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

Open up a slack channel and the people will come.

CoinTracking.info - Your personal Profit / Loss Portfolio Monitor and Tax Tool for all Digital Coins
CoinTracking is analyzing all your trades and generates in real time tons of useful information such as the profit / loss of your trades, your balances, realized and unrealized gains, reports for tax declaration and many more. For Bitcoin and over 3000 altcoins, assets and commodities.
Get 10% discount for all packages or create your own affiliate link to get 20% for every sale.
ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
April 20, 2017, 09:11:36 PM
 #2777


I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

Open up a slack channel and the people will come.

I think slack is a good approach but there is security issues and also the memory leaks are ridiculous. Please everyone join the telegram so we have a point of entry for the entire community. It's simple and easy and you can use it on any device.

stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 10:48:45 PM
 #2778


I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

Open up a slack channel and the people will come.

I think slack is a good approach but there is security issues and also the memory leaks are ridiculous. Please everyone join the telegram so we have a point of entry for the entire community. It's simple and easy and you can use it on any device.

Telegram is much nicer imo, more professional and secure.
ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2017, 01:18:49 AM
 #2779

Coinmarketcap is updated thank you Gliss!  Cool

chompyZ
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 291
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 21, 2017, 07:12:08 AM
 #2780

Also is there a way to password protect our wallets?

THIS !
Even with Linux, VPN, iptables etc. I still feel like a sitting duck... Sad
Pages: « 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 [139] 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 ... 200 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!