Bitcoin Forum
November 15, 2018, 06:14:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: JPMorgan’s Monopoly Money: IP Analysis of USPTO App 20130317984  (Read 1793 times)
row5_seat47
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 01:04:42 AM
 #1

Report Date:  Wed, 12/11/2013
On August 5, 2013 JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPMorgan) filed an application for an electronic mobile payment system which has eerie similarities to the popular online currency Bitcoin. Unfortunately for JPMorgan, all of the claims, totaling 175 claims, as of October 18, 2013, for published US patent application 20130317984 (the ‘984 application) have been either cancelled or rejected.

http://www.m-cam.com/patently-obvious/jpmorgan-s-monopoly-money

Full Report
http://www.m-cam.com/sites/www.m-cam.com/files/JPMorganMonopolyMoney.pdf

Ref: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/jpmorgan-chase-building-bitcoin-killer/
1542305671
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542305671

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542305671
Reply with quote  #2

1542305671
Report to moderator
1542305671
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542305671

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542305671
Reply with quote  #2

1542305671
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1542305671
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542305671

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542305671
Reply with quote  #2

1542305671
Report to moderator
hieroglyph
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
December 14, 2013, 01:33:10 AM
 #2

Thank you very much for the post.  I look forward to diving into the articles for the full picture of what JPM is trying to pull.  Good to know there isn't any progress thus far.

stompix
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 739



View Profile
December 14, 2013, 01:58:11 AM
 #3

Report Date:  Wed, 12/11/2013
On August 5, 2013 JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPMorgan) filed an application for an electronic mobile payment system which has eerie similarities to the popular online currency Bitcoin. Unfortunately for JPMorgan, all of the claims, totaling 175 claims, as of October 18, 2013, for published US patent application 20130317984 (the ‘984 application) have been either cancelled or rejected.

http://www.m-cam.com/patently-obvious/jpmorgan-s-monopoly-money

Full Report
http://www.m-cam.com/sites/www.m-cam.com/files/JPMorganMonopolyMoney.pdf

Ref: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/jpmorgan-chase-building-bitcoin-killer/


So if those claims have already been rejected a few month ago , why is everybody freaking now?

Bitcoinpro
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 14, 2013, 09:28:17 AM
 #4

Report Date:  Wed, 12/11/2013
On August 5, 2013 JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPMorgan) filed an application for an electronic mobile payment system which has eerie similarities to the popular online currency Bitcoin. Unfortunately for JPMorgan, all of the claims, totaling 175 claims, as of October 18, 2013, for published US patent application 20130317984 (the ‘984 application) have been either cancelled or rejected.

http://www.m-cam.com/patently-obvious/jpmorgan-s-monopoly-money

Full Report
http://www.m-cam.com/sites/www.m-cam.com/files/JPMorganMonopolyMoney.pdf

Ref: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/jpmorgan-chase-building-bitcoin-killer/


So if those claims have already been rejected a few month ago , why is everybody freaking now?

no one its ?

WWW.FACEBOOK.COM

CRYPTOCURRENCY CENTRAL BANK

LTC: LP7bcFENVL9vdmUVea1M6FMyjSmUfsMVYf
row5_seat47
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 15, 2013, 12:48:22 AM
 #5


So if those claims have already been rejected a few month ago , why is everybody freaking now?

Because it was "Refiled" and possibly amended?  Because they are still attempting to patent it?
Just because claims have been rejected doesn't mean that they don't possess technology.  Is it vaporware? I dunno.
Those dismissing patent because its from 1999 should also dismiss the U.S. Constitution because its from 1787 (and i'm sure that there are many who would like to).
Bitcoin has been around since 2008/2009.  Do I dismiss latest generation of Android because Android 1.0 was  created in September 2008 like Bitcoin?
The fact that JPM technology dates back to 1999 means they had that many more years to improve the underlying tech.

However at the end of the day, all this lends credibility to Bitcoin.
NewLiberty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001


Gresham's Lawyer


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2013, 02:54:16 PM
 #6

Yes, just because its JPM, and they are filing patents to prevent others from doing what they think they can do, does this mean that what they were crafting was bad technology.
Or just in hands that aren't ours.

FREE MONEY1 Bitcoin for Silver and Gold NewLibertyDollar.com and now BITCOIN SPECIE (silver 1 ozt) shows value by QR
Bulk premiums as low as .0012 BTC "BETTER, MORE COLLECTIBLE, AND CHEAPER THAN SILVER EAGLES" 1Free of Government
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1011


https://karatcoin.co


View Profile
December 21, 2013, 02:54:50 PM
 #7

So if those claims have already been rejected a few month ago , why is everybody freaking now?

No one is getting ballistic here. But we should not underestimate our enemies. JP Morgan bosses are no idiots. They are among our strongest rivals.


  █ █████       ▄████▀▄██▀
  █ █████     ▄████▀███▀
  █ █████    ████▀███▀
  █ █████  ▄███▀███▓
  █ █████▄███▀████▀
  █ ███████▀████▀
  █ █████▀▄█████▄
  █ ███▀▄█████████▄
  █ █▀▄██ ▀█████████▄
  █ ▄████   ▀███████▀█▄   
  █ █████     ▀███▀▄████▄
  █ █████       ▀▄████████▄
                   
                    █████                   
                ▄███  █  ███▄               
             ███      █      ███             
         ▄███         █         ███▄         
       ██    ███████████████████    ██       
    ████            ██ ██            ████   
    ██             █     █             ██   
    █ █           █       █           █ █   
    █ ██         █         █         ██ █   
    █  ██      ██           ██      ██  █   
    █   ██    ██             ██    ██   █   
    █    ██  ██               ██  ██    █   
    █     █ ██                 ██ █     █   
    █     █████████████████████████     █   
    █  ███  ██                 ██  ███  █   
    ███       █               █       ███   
      ███      ██           ██      ███     
         ███     █         █     ███         
            ▀███  ██     ██  ███▀           
                ▀████   ████▀               
▀███▀
                 
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
row5_seat47
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 21, 2013, 08:41:12 PM
 #8

There was a good post on slashdot

From the USPTO PAIR database, "By this preliminary Amendment, claims 1-154 have been canceled......

http://beta.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4541007&op=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=45655665
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!