Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 08:20:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Why I don't listen to Paul Krugman, or anyone that says the Internet is a Bubble  (Read 3585 times)
cdog
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 12:36:37 PM
 #21

I respect Krugman but disagree with him entirely on this point, and the link to Stross' blog just highlights how weak this argument is.
Hawker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 29, 2013, 05:13:14 PM
 #22

Krugman is backpedalling on the headline "Bitcoin is Evil"

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/the-humor-test/?_r=0
Quote
Matt O’Brien makes a funny about BitCoin — and the faithful are furious.

But then, they do seem to be a humor-impaired bunch. I’ve been getting rage-filled missives about the title of my last post on the subject. Folks, there’s this concept you may not have heard about, called a “joke.”

The actual post he made was rational - Bitcoin is the antithesis of what he believes in so he will always oppose its adoption.  But the headline was plain old clickbait.
Peter R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1007



View Profile
December 29, 2013, 05:27:02 PM
Last edit: December 29, 2013, 06:31:17 PM by Peter R
 #23

Krugman is backpedalling on the headline "Bitcoin is Evil"

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/the-humor-test/?_r=0
Quote
Matt O’Brien makes a funny about BitCoin — and the faithful are furious.

But then, they do seem to be a humor-impaired bunch. I’ve been getting rage-filled missives about the title of my last post on the subject. Folks, there’s this concept you may not have heard about, called a “joke.”

The actual post he made was rational - Bitcoin is the antithesis of what he believes in so he will always oppose its adoption.  But the headline was plain old clickbait.

It was a "half joke."  You say something you really mean, but add a bit of hyperbole so that people can't tell for sure, and back-peddle when the trial balloon pops.  I think we've all done it.  

Was the quote where he implied that it was good if governments could monitor the financial transactions of its citizens a joke about the NSA?


Run Bitcoin Unlimited (www.bitcoinunlimited.info)
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 06:23:00 PM
 #24

Oh dear, Cbeast doesn't understand how open source coding works does he? Tongue It just so happens that I've been thinking about copying a lot of the earlier versions of Bitcoin to my hard drive to redistribute over Bittorrent in the event of a takeover just in case any loyalists or the Bitcoin foundation get any ideas about trying to take over the network with force.
Is that how you interpret what I wrote? I didn't say anything about force. If you're implying forking, then you completely misunderstood the point. What you propose is possible, but unreasonable.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
cryptocoinmkt.com
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
December 29, 2013, 11:56:58 PM
 #25

Today, December 28 Paul Krugman posts an article stating how he doesn't believe in Bitcoin and is probably nothing but a Bubble:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bitcoin-is-evil/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto&_r=0

In another comment from Reddit, they show another article that shows his prediction of the Internet is nothing more than a bubble and will be no more popular than a fax machine:

http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2010/12/paul-krugmans-predictions.html

If too lazy to click on the links, here is what Paul predicted on the internet:

* Productivity will drop sharply this year. Nineteen ninety-seven, which was a very good year for worker productivity, has led many pundits to conclude that the great technology-led boom has begun. They are wrong. Last year will prove to have been a blip, just like 1992.

* Inflation will be back. Wages are rising at almost 5 percent annually, and the underlying growth of productivity is probably only 1.5 percent or less. Sooner or later, companies will have to start raising prices. In 1999 inflation will probably be more than 3 percent; with only moderate bad luck–say, a drop in the dollar–it could easily top 4 percent. Sell bonds!

* Within two or three years, the current mood of American triumphalism–our belief that we have pulled economically and technologically ahead of the rest of the world–will evaporate. All it will take is a few technological setbacks or a mild recession here while Europe or Japan recovers a bit.

* The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in "Metcalfe's law"–which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants–becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet's impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine's.

* As the rate of technological change in computing slows, the number of jobs for IT specialists will decelerate, then actually turn down; ten years from now, the phrase information economy will sound silly.

* Sometime in the next 20 years, maybe sooner, there will be another '70s-style raw-material crunch: a disruption of oil supplies, a sharp run-up in agricultural prices, or both. And suddenly people will remember that we are still living in the material world and that natural resources matter.

Because of this, I will probably go all in on Bitcoin. I will do the opposite of what the media and pros say.

By doing this, I have netted unimaginable returns so far whether be it Stocks or Bitcoin. The media and other "professionals" told me to stay away from Bitcoin, guess what I invested a bunch in April of 2013 when it crashed at 60 and didn't sell. I'm probably gonna invest more since 2014 seems more promising then the news we had in 2013.


Paul Krugman is a "full on retard". 
He is nothing but a mouthpiece for Wall Street and the Federal Reserve. The crap he says and writes about don't make sense...he is a clueless pundit put into a "expert podium" to fool the masses and sway how people think.

Paul Krugman knows crap about crap, and he projects himself as "Oh, I am a super smart academic"...Dumbass.

Watch the financial media long enough, you know who is telling the "truth" and who is blowing smoke and hiding facts or telling lies.  Krugman is definitely one of them, the other I despise is Jim Kramer....what a loser.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!