New Report to moderator stats ;) thank you theymos

[TheBeardedBaby]

Here there are

Report to moderator
Use this function to inform the moderators and administrators of an abusive or wrongly posted message.
Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this.
 
You have reported 1073 posts with 100% accuracy (1012 good, 9 bad, 52 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports.

Update. Now we have also "report history"


image loading ....

[1713298347]

1713298347

[mdayonliner]

Aha! here is mine 

Click here if unable to see image

[Welsh]

I noticed that things were being changed step by step as I was reporting, and then hit a error for a few seconds thought I might of broken something for a moment. I particularly like the unhandled stats being shown could be useful if your ever wondering why a post hasn't been dealt with.

Hopefully people don't go on a rant when they see that one of their posts got marked bad though. Impressive stats from the both of you considering your relatively new. Good job.

[criz2fer]

Hopefully people don't go on a rant when they see that one of their posts got marked bad though.

It would not be a big deal for the reporter because we are not reporting just for the stat but to make the forum clean from spammers and users that are present in the forum.

Hope we can filter our reports in the future. (Just a suggestion)

[TheBeardedBaby]

I think now Vod and LoyceV will be happy with the new stats. They were the ones pushing for this extra data.
Next step is to get a data dump on the report stats, it will be good to see how many are actively reporting

[InvoKing]

Hopefully people don't go on a rant when they see that one of their posts got marked bad though.

It is legitimate to know why in order to improve our reports quality imo.
Well, i don't ask for it urgently but hopefully it will happens in the future.
I consider this as a good move. Thx theymos.

[Welsh]

I think now Vod and LoyceV will be happy with the new stats. They were the ones pushing for this extra data.
Next step is to get a data dump on the report stats, it will be good to see how many are actively reporting

In addition to this it would be nice to know the average reports per week/month. Could put into perspective how much the moderators are actually dealing with. (hint: a lot)

It would not be a big deal for the reporter because we are not reporting just for the stat but to make the forum clean from spammers and users that are present in the forum.

Hope we can filter our reports in the future. (Just a suggestion)

We've already seen people bring up the issue when their accuracy drops in the past. I feel it could become more common now once someone sees that one of their posts was marked bad. Especially, since before this implementation accuracy didn't fluctuate where as the new system does.

It is legitimate to know why in order to improve our reports quality imo.
Well, i don't ask for it urgently but hopefully it will happens in the future.
I consider this as a good move. Thx theymos.

Yeah, I like the new stats. Although, it could have the opposite effect, and prevent people reporting posts they aren't 100% sure on as the stats are much more accurate now. Hopefully, that isn't the case though.

I remember theymos changing how the report percentage was calculated before to a more precise way. Although, was quickly changed back. Here's the quote:

Since so many people have so many reports, I changed the percentage on the reports page so that it uses proper rounding instead of ceil() and shows 1 decimal. Actually, I changed my mind. This would probably make people feel subconsciously paranoid about reporting.

UPDATE: Seems we have a report history button which shows what reports have been dealt with now. Which I do like, a lot.

[TheBeardedBaby]

@Welsh
I do report what I see, and in the report I often write what I feel is wrong with the post.
I would be very happy to know which are those 9 bad reports. Just for info.
I try to do some research before I report something.

[SFR10]

How far back, we can see these report stats on our "report history" (a week, a month or more)?
- I'm asking this since I've been inactive (recently), in terms of reporting.
Would be nice to see our own comments, somewhere on "report history".

[MadZ]

How far back, we can see these report stats on our "report history" (a week, a month or more)?
- I'm asking this since I've been inactive (recently), in terms of reporting.
Would be nice to see our own comments, somewhere on "report history".

Most of my reports are from years ago and I still have stats on them. Just hit report to moderator and you will see for yourself.

[TheQuin]

How far back, we can see these report stats on our "report history" (a week, a month or more)?
- I'm asking this since I've been inactive (recently), in terms of reporting.

It looks to be one month.


I have to say I'm amazed that such a high number are dealt with. I'd assumed the % of unhandled reports to be much higher. The mods are certainly earning their pennies.

[SFR10]

Most of my reports are from years ago and I still have stats on them. Just hit report to moderator and you will see for yourself.

You may have misunderstood my first post (perhaps I should've included the appropriate link as well).

I was asking for listed reports on "report history".

It looks to be one month.

Thank you.

[TheBeardedBaby]

I see that all the homograph attacks I reported are note handled yet. Why is that? Do you need more proof for those?

[LoyceV]

I think now Vod and LoyceV will be happy with the new stats. They were the ones pushing for this extra data.

I wouldn't call it pushing, but I was curious Abd it is nice to see the stats.

My stats:

You have reported 3093 posts with 98% accuracy (2810 good, 63 bad, 220 unhandled).

That means my 98% is rounded up, I'm 10 bad reports away from falling into 97% territory.

From my history, some of the posts that I considered off-topic and/or trolling are marked as bad reports. Spam or wrong board are all marked as good.

Is this not available for all accounts (yet)? My LoyceBot and LoyceMobile don't show more stats.

[TheBeardedBaby]

I think now Vod and LoyceV will be happy with the new stats. They were the ones pushing for this extra data.

I wouldn't call it pushing, but I was curious Abd it is nice to see the stats.

My stats:

You have reported 3093 posts with 98% accuracy (2810 good, 63 bad, 220 unhandled).

That means my 98% is rounded up, I'm 10 bad reports away from falling into 97% territory.

From my history, some of the posts that I considered off-topic and/or trolling are marked as bad reports. Spam or wrong board are all marked as good.

Yeah OK, maybe pushing was not the right word here. It was also interesting for me to know my stats too.

BTW congrats to the new Merit Source. We need more people like you here

Is this not available for all accounts (yet)? My LoyceBot and LoyceMobile don't show more stats.

Maybe it is also rank related.

[WelshOnTheRoad]

That's interesting. Either rank based or number of reports based. As the majority of users likely wouldnt use this stat unfortunately.

[hilariousetc]

I don't even have a link to my report history on this account for some reason. I do on my main one but there's obviously nothing there since I haven't needed to report anything in years.

I see that all the homograph attacks I reported are note handled yet. Why is that? Do you need more proof for those?

They take time to look into. It's best to include the link to the post they copied which makes things much easier. Otherwise staff have to spend time searching for it and they can't always be found easy.

[WelshOnTheRoad]

Anyone who beats my 1 reported post can have a howeycoin on me

I don't even have a link to my report history on this account for some reason. I do on my main one but there's obviously nothing there since I haven't needed to report anything in years.

I suppose you haven't reported much on this account? Which would somewhat support my idea of it being tied to number of reports.

[TheBeardedBaby]

I don't even have a link to my report history on this account for some reason. I do on my main one but there's obviously nothing there since I haven't needed to report anything in years.

I see that all the homograph attacks I reported are note handled yet. Why is that? Do you need more proof for those?

They take time to look into. It's best to include the link to the post they copied which makes things much easier. Otherwise staff have to spend time searching for it and they can't always be found easy.

It takes a lot of time for me to change back all Cyrillic letters back to Latin in order to search for copy/paste posts. It's easier to detect the homographs.
This is why I proposed here using of homographs/homoglyphs outside of the Local boards to be forbidden and added into rules. Why would one use such a technique if there is nothing to hide in the text?
This will make both our and Mod's lives easier

[hilariousetc]

I don't think all of them are doing it maliciously though. Maybe that's just the way their keyboard is configured if that's their native language and originally it's genuine users making a post and some other bot is just coming along and copy and pasting that one. Could be wrong but I'm not sure whether people are doing purposely to avoid detection.