Bitcoin Forum
September 26, 2024, 11:59:16 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Money does not have intrinsic value says vsauce  (Read 1508 times)
Interized (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Coolness: ∞


View Profile
January 01, 2014, 10:49:12 PM
 #1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2tKg3E53DM

Gold isn't the answer.
lnternet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 299
Merit: 253


View Profile
January 01, 2014, 11:04:51 PM
 #2

USD or some such fiat is usually the preferred reference frame for value. But borrowing a bit from relativity theory, you can choose any reference frame. You can count your total assets in BTC, Gold, Coca Cola shares, cigarettes or bottles of Tide.

These units of value change relatively to one another in time.

People like to think they earned money when stock prices go up. But this is just an interpretation of what is happening. In more objective terms, if you hold stocks and cash, and stock prices go up relative to cash, you still hold the same stocks and cash. If you take the cash as preferred reference frame, you gained value, as when you convert everything to cash, you now have more than before. But if you take the stocks as preferred reference frame, you lost value, as when you convert everything to stocks, you now have less than before.

In this sense there is no inherent value anywhere, all value is relative to all other values. In this context choosing a preferred value reference frame and calling it intrinsically valuable seems arbitrary.




1ntemetqbXokPSSkuHH4iuAJRTQMP6uJ9
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 03:12:56 AM
 #3

USD or some such fiat is usually the preferred reference frame for value. But borrowing a bit from relativity theory, you can choose any reference frame. You can count your total assets in BTC, Gold, Coca Cola shares, cigarettes or bottles of Tide.

These units of value change relatively to one another in time.

People like to think they earned money when stock prices go up. But this is just an interpretation of what is happening. In more objective terms, if you hold stocks and cash, and stock prices go up relative to cash, you still hold the same stocks and cash. If you take the cash as preferred reference frame, you gained value, as when you convert everything to cash, you now have more than before. But if you take the stocks as preferred reference frame, you lost value, as when you convert everything to stocks, you now have less than before.

In this sense there is no inherent value anywhere, all value is relative to all other values. In this context choosing a preferred value reference frame and calling it intrinsically valuable seems arbitrary.





Couldn't have put it better myself. You don't have to use "money" as your frame of reference for value. Its often better if you don't, especially if you live in an inflationary environment.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!