|
nakaone
|
 |
January 28, 2014, 10:50:07 AM |
|
regarding the whitepaper of bitshares - they have, if I understand it correctly bitshares, which back bitassets.
how does the backing system in xcp run?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the
first distributed timestamping system.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SyRenity
|
|
January 28, 2014, 12:40:29 PM |
|
Just checked the blockscan.com assets, and noticed that my test asset is gone?
Any breaking changes that were done lately?
|
|
|
|
|
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
|
|
January 28, 2014, 12:54:15 PM |
|
Just checked the blockscan.com assets, and noticed that my test asset is gone?
Any breaking changes that were done lately?
Do you know the transaction ID, issuing address, or the exact asset name? |
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
January 28, 2014, 01:05:41 PM |
|
Just checked the blockscan.com assets, and noticed that my test asset is gone?
Any breaking changes that were done lately?
Do you know the transaction ID, issuing address, or the exact asset name? I upgraded the client to the latest develop branch git and also noticed the reduction in valid assets One of my test asset have also dissapeared. The corresponding validity field has the remark "insufficient funds" which is was not an issue in the master branch. At the moment I am only displaying assets from issuances table with the validity of "valid' Eg: the asset Blockscan |
|
|
|
|
SyRenity
|
|
January 28, 2014, 01:27:35 PM |
|
I also constantly getting zmq error on Windows after upgrade to latest, even after running re-setup.py.
Ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
brite_enclave
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
January 28, 2014, 02:12:12 PM |
|
Syrenity: what exact error message are you getting? I'm not a Windows person, but I'll be glad to help if I can.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SyRenity
|
|
January 28, 2014, 02:14:38 PM |
|
Syrenity: what exact error message are you getting? I'm not a Windows person, but I'll be glad to help if I can.
Deps issue: C:\counterpartyd_build>c:\Python32\python.exe run.py server Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 22, i <module> from lib import (config, api, zeromq, util, exceptions, bitcoin, blocks) File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\zeromq.py", line 14, in < odule> import zmq ImportError: No module named zmq |
|
|
|
|
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
|
|
January 28, 2014, 02:21:30 PM |
|
Just checked the blockscan.com assets, and noticed that my test asset is gone?
Any breaking changes that were done lately?
Do you know the transaction ID, issuing address, or the exact asset name? I upgraded the client to the latest develop branch git and also noticed the reduction in valid assets One of my test asset have also dissapeared. The corresponding validity field has the remark "insufficient funds" which is was not an issue in the master branch. At the moment I am only displaying assets from issuances table with the validity of "valid' Eg: the asset Blockscan Ah, there's a bug in the develop branch where counterpartyd isn't checking to make sure that the fee is only charged after the protocol was changed to include it. I'll fix that now. |
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
January 28, 2014, 02:32:26 PM |
|
Ah, there's a bug in the develop branch where counterpartyd isn't checking to make sure that the fee is only charged after the protocol was changed to include it. I'll fix that now.
Please do drop a note once you're done with the commit. I will continue running the develop branch on blockscan if it helps to uncover some of these issues before they make it to the master Cheers |
|
|
|
Alias
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 127
Merit: 100
Money be green
|
|
January 28, 2014, 02:56:05 PM |
|
Looks like you can buy 1 XCP for ฿0.01 here: http://btc-market.net/bitcoin/buy-counterparty-xcp.htmlThat is quite a markup.  |
In times of change, it is the learners who will inherit the earth, while the learned will find themselves beautifully equipped for a world that no longer exists.
|
|
|
xnova
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 390
Merit: 254
Counterparty Developer
|
|
January 28, 2014, 03:13:19 PM |
|
Syrenity: what exact error message are you getting? I'm not a Windows person, but I'll be glad to help if I can.
Deps issue: C:\counterpartyd_build>c:\Python32\python.exe run.py server Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 22, i <module> from lib import (config, api, zeromq, util, exceptions, bitcoin, blocks) File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\zeromq.py", line 14, in < odule> import zmq ImportError: No module named zmq Please see the docs: http://counterpartyd-build.readthedocs.org/en/latest/BuildingFromSource.html#id1You will need to install the zmq library as stated there (as this is windows it's independent from running setup.py and a manual installation). |
|
|
|
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
|
|
January 28, 2014, 03:19:19 PM |
|
Ah, there's a bug in the develop branch where counterpartyd isn't checking to make sure that the fee is only charged after the protocol was changed to include it. I'll fix that now.
Please do drop a note once you're done with the commit. I will continue running the develop branch on blockscan if it helps to uncover some of these issues before they make it to the master Cheers See commit 5708257caf0a53c77eb5038a1c999c6fa27ecf38. That sounds good: we need more testing on develop. |
|
|
|
|
|
lonsharim
|
|
January 28, 2014, 03:39:14 PM |
|
Especially when you can still burn and get a minimum of 10 XCP for that price. |
|
|
|
|
|
SyRenity
|
|
January 28, 2014, 04:00:07 PM |
|
Thanks, I was certain it something small like this  . |
|
|
|
|
|
nakaone
|
|
January 28, 2014, 04:07:26 PM |
|
Status: RESTART Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python33\lib\site-packages\cx_Freeze\initscripts\Console3.py", line 2 7, in <module> File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 600, i n <module> File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 470, in f ollow File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 437, in f ollow File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 301, in g et_tx_info binascii.Error: Odd-length string  |
|
|
|
|
wizzardTim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1000
Reality is stranger than fiction
|
|
January 28, 2014, 04:13:29 PM |
|
|
Behold the Tangle Mysteries! Dare to know It's truth.
- Excerpt from the IOTA Sacred Texts Vol. I
|
|
|
Patel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1321
Merit: 1007
|
|
January 28, 2014, 04:15:27 PM |
|
He did the same with MSC too. Made quite a bit i'm guessing. But he is legit. |
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
January 28, 2014, 04:27:11 PM |
|
Ah, there's a bug in the develop branch where counterpartyd isn't checking to make sure that the fee is only charged after the protocol was changed to include it. I'll fix that now.
Please do drop a note once you're done with the commit. I will continue running the develop branch on blockscan if it helps to uncover some of these issues before they make it to the master Cheers See commit 5708257caf0a53c77eb5038a1c999c6fa27ecf38. That sounds good: we need more testing on develop. I assume that I will have to manually delete the existing version 5 db and rebuild from scratch again? |
|
|
|
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
|
|
January 28, 2014, 04:56:34 PM |
|
Ah, there's a bug in the develop branch where counterpartyd isn't checking to make sure that the fee is only charged after the protocol was changed to include it. I'll fix that now.
Please do drop a note once you're done with the commit. I will continue running the develop branch on blockscan if it helps to uncover some of these issues before they make it to the master Cheers See commit 5708257caf0a53c77eb5038a1c999c6fa27ecf38. That sounds good: we need more testing on develop. I assume that I will have to manually delete the existing version 5 db and rebuild from scratch again? I actually just committed another change to the database, so you can just use that (this one increments the DB version number, which makes the rebuild automatic). |
|
|
|
|
|
delulo
|
|
January 28, 2014, 04:59:44 PM |
|
How does XCP improve on Bitshares (Mastercoin to a lesser degree)? As those are similar concepts. What advantages does XCP have? What are core differences?
Main feature is XCP has features working right now, and everyone else is mostly just talk. I will acknowledge when they release features, but so far MSC only has simple send in 6 months, whereas XCP has its core already developed in less than 1. XCP will also have a client released soon. Does Counterparty use price feeds or is price discovery solely marked based (like with Bitshares)? Any info on that? |
|
|
|
|
|
