Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 09:02:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 ... 251 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] microCoin MRC - alcurEX - Scrypt-Jane - nFactor  (Read 374701 times)
spiffcow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:26:29 AM
 #2521

Kernel.cpp Line 20

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic
static std::map<int, unsigned int> mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
    boost::assign::map_list_of
    ( 0, 0x0e00670bu )
   ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu )
    
    ;

It looks like block 124000 is looking for 0xa4251ce5b54ee576 but got 0xe791f02cu in checkpoints array.



I was also looking into this ...
My understanding is that the second checkpoint (124000) should not be set at all yet.

It was most probably in the coin MRC was cloned from, because this coin already went over block 124000. But the value is probably valid for this coin blockchain, not for MRC.

Anyone can confirm ?

EDIT1: anyway, it clearly is not required also because proof-of-stake is not enabled yet in MRC ... it should kick in only after one full year (60*60*24*365 seconds, as stated in main.cpp)

EDIT2: the 124000 value does not come from the PPC code (they have other checkpoints for the proof of stake, but not this one). From which coin was MRC cloned ? This value most probably comes from that ancestor.

MRC comes from TIX. We have found the proof-of-stake checkpoint and removed it. We now face the problem of testing if the problem is fixed or not. This should create a hardfork, but fortunately the fork the older client is on should never be able to go past block 123,999.

Does anyone have any suggestions? We are considering putting the wallet for download and getting pools to use it and see if it works.

Put it up for download.  Launch 2.0!
1714035738
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035738

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035738
Reply with quote  #2

1714035738
Report to moderator
1714035738
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035738

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035738
Reply with quote  #2

1714035738
Report to moderator
1714035738
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035738

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035738
Reply with quote  #2

1714035738
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714035738
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035738

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035738
Reply with quote  #2

1714035738
Report to moderator
1714035738
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035738

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035738
Reply with quote  #2

1714035738
Report to moderator
1714035738
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035738

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035738
Reply with quote  #2

1714035738
Report to moderator
lexa
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 10:29:37 AM
 #2522

Kernel.cpp Line 20

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic
static std::map<int, unsigned int> mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
    boost::assign::map_list_of
    ( 0, 0x0e00670bu )
   ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu )
    
    ;

It looks like block 124000 is looking for 0xa4251ce5b54ee576 but got 0xe791f02cu in checkpoints array.



I was also looking into this ...
My understanding is that the second checkpoint (124000) should not be set at all yet.

It was most probably in the coin MRC was cloned from, because this coin already went over block 124000. But the value is probably valid for this coin blockchain, not for MRC.

Anyone can confirm ?

EDIT1: anyway, it clearly is not required also because proof-of-stake is not enabled yet in MRC ... it should kick in only after one full year (60*60*24*365 seconds, as stated in main.cpp)

EDIT2: the 124000 value does not come from the PPC code (they have other checkpoints for the proof of stake, but not this one). From which coin was MRC cloned ? This value most probably comes from that ancestor.

MRC comes from TIX. We have found the proof-of-stake checkpoint and removed it. We now face the problem of testing if the problem is fixed or not. This should create a hardfork, but fortunately the fork the older client is on should never be able to go past block 123,999.

Does anyone have any suggestions? We are considering putting the wallet for download and getting pools to use it and see if it works.

I can test it on my pool with my GPU's

mattbigblue
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:32:33 AM
 #2523

so atm mining is pointless??

lexa
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 10:35:28 AM
 #2524

so atm mining is pointless??

Yes, until issue is resolved

freshmeat
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:36:19 AM
 #2525

The dump is on at poloniex ....
jinhuadfh1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:39:08 AM
 #2526

oh god I just bought some MRC in poloniex and transfer is to Mintpal but it always in pending stuts, what can i do?
spiffcow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:40:14 AM
 #2527

So is there an ETA on this?  It's 2:30 am and I need to get some sleep, but don't want to miss a giant goldrush when the servers come back online.  Maybe you should set the block rewards to 0 for a few hundred blocks, just to get everyone time to get back on?
spiffcow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:41:22 AM
 #2528

The dump is on at poloniex ....

How so?  Sell prices are still at .00000200, which is near the high for the week
bittick
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 506


Cryptocasino.com


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:42:34 AM
 #2529

The dump is on at poloniex ....

yes dumping has commenced, I have no coins on the exchange all are in my wallet so I cant sell.
yet you can buy some more Smiley

Mr.V
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:43:05 AM
 #2530

So is there an ETA on this?  It's 2:30 am and I need to get some sleep, but don't want to miss a giant goldrush when the servers come back online.  Maybe you should set the block rewards to 0 for a few hundred blocks, just to get everyone time to get back on?

There wont be a gold rush because the diff retargets every block so it could jump from 0 to 4 if all the miners return anyway.

BTC:1NwEE7C2hVLSNGwSrFvsYgTrKddCvfhRwY
jcarl987
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:44:43 AM
 #2531

I think the idea is that not all miners will return at once, so there will be a period of low difficulty to start with. Hopefully it will come back online while I'm still awake to make up for the 6 hours spent sleeping and mining nothing last night.

HuuHachu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:45:16 AM
 #2532

The dump is on at poloniex ....

yes dumping has commenced, I have no coins on the exchange all are in my wallet so I cant sell.

The bug is identified and easy to correct, a patched version is currently being tested ... no need to dump Smiley Should buy instead Smiley

noble: 9mKQpsfLeabjFsPv3YR9zYoAVymDPyfjCp
SkyValeey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:45:43 AM
 #2533

Do NOT PANIC guys  Wink
Just wait, not stupid sell.
MRC will be on coinmarket - look what coinM did with mintcoin price:)
MRC will be above 12 sato at coinM I think.
spiffcow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:46:06 AM
 #2534

So is there an ETA on this?  It's 2:30 am and I need to get some sleep, but don't want to miss a giant goldrush when the servers come back online.  Maybe you should set the block rewards to 0 for a few hundred blocks, just to get everyone time to get back on?

There wont be a gold rush because the diff retargets every block so it could jump from 0 to 4 if all the miners return anyway.

But they won't return right away is the point.  The hashrate will be 1/10 of what it's been lately because people will not know yet that they can return to the coin.  Massive payouts can generally be expected for the next several hours after it comes back online.
freshmeat
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:46:11 AM
 #2535

The dump is on at poloniex ....

How so?  Sell prices are still at .00000200, which is near the high for the week


buy volume is shutting down so dump is on
Mr.V
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:47:33 AM
 #2536

The dump is on at poloniex ....

yes dumping has commenced, I have no coins on the exchange all are in my wallet so I cant sell.
yet you can buy some more Smiley

lol im actually waiting for ltc to crash on btc-e so I could use it to buy more MRC, only problem is the price of MRC has risen much more then ltc has fallen so im back at point A lol. I was thinking of spending 50ltc for 50Mil MRC just a few days ago but didn't pull the trigger due to increasing block rewards, but I wish I had bought up until this lil prob we're having tonight

BTC:1NwEE7C2hVLSNGwSrFvsYgTrKddCvfhRwY
MCR (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 10:55:16 AM
 #2537

Please update to the latest microCoin wallet. This update is mandatory and older clients will not work anymore.

Sourcecode:
https://github.com/microcoinsource/microcoin

Windows wallet:
http://www19.zippyshare.com/v/62125419/file.html
jinhuadfh1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:57:07 AM
 #2538

Do NOT PANIC guys  Wink
Just wait, not stupid sell.
MRC will be on coinmarket - look what coinM did with mintcoin price:)
MRC will be above 12 sato at coinM I think.

Hi bro, how do you know coinmarket will add MRC?
kovand11
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:57:21 AM
 #2539

What you should do, is to fix the PoS and the checkpoint both, and set the 124000 for a random value (and dont tell it before the release).

Thats important, because if you only fix that hardcoded checkpoint, someone can stream out his alone mined version of blockchain, in case if he built his own client before.
SkyValeey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:58:46 AM
 #2540

Do NOT PANIC guys  Wink
Just wait, not stupid sell.
MRC will be on coinmarket - look what coinM did with mintcoin price:)
MRC will be above 12 sato at coinM I think.

Hi bro, how do you know coinmarket will add MRC?

Well just guess; good volume, raising popularity; it's not info but my guess:)
Pages: « 1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 ... 251 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!