cr1st0f
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2014, 03:42:44 PM |
|
I just connected my 3 BE to this server and I get more accepted but with the low hash on the pool it may not be more profitable than staying on the other pool. The pool has 33GHS for now ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) the profit are the same of other pool yes ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I want do some test on low hash hardware for optimizing the varDiff
|
|
|
|
shpion
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2014, 03:52:23 PM |
|
I just connected my 3 BE to this server and I get more accepted but with the low hash on the pool it may not be more profitable than staying on the other pool. The pool has 33GHS for now ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) the profit are the same of other pool yes ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I want do some test on low hash hardware for optimizing the varDiff I took my 3 BE's off. Would you like me to put them back?
|
|
|
|
cr1st0f
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2014, 03:54:16 PM |
|
I just connected my 3 BE to this server and I get more accepted but with the low hash on the pool it may not be more profitable than staying on the other pool. The pool has 33GHS for now ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) the profit are the same of other pool yes ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I want do some test on low hash hardware for optimizing the varDiff I took my 3 BE's off. Would you like me to put them back? if you want to would very useful to test the pool ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Edit.: Raise raise raise raise ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Good work ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs30.postimg.org%2Fjjd1kp4a9%2F94o_GBDlc.png&t=665&c=LGc5qoBVPfa71Q)
|
|
|
|
XiaoRui
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 229
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2014, 04:04:30 PM |
|
i WTB MED,plz give me your offer
|
|
|
|
halabibk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2014, 08:59:48 PM |
|
1 MED = 0.0001 BTC
|
|
|
|
oscarsum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 01:23:41 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
poplolnman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 01:26:53 AM |
|
1 MED=0.0001 btc because its going to be worth alot more soon enough
|
I'm in 400,000 euros debt , dont help me , i rather die
|
|
|
oscarsum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 01:55:20 AM |
|
1 MED=0.0001 btc because its going to be worth alot more soon enough No,Thx,Price is too high .I am not chinese local tyrant
|
|
|
|
adnx2h
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 03:13:19 AM |
|
1 MED=0.0001 btc because its going to be worth alot more soon enough No,Thx,Price is too high .I am not chinese local tyrant Which price is ok for you?
|
|
|
|
eestimees
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 07:32:27 AM |
|
Should we vote for escrow person for smoother trades btc-med and ltc-med ? and IHMO 1btc for 10k med is not much ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) but that is my opinion.
|
— eestimees
|
|
|
eestimees
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 08:21:03 AM |
|
MediterraneanCoin pool ibipot.com (390GHash) offers: Superfut - thrilling football-themed game - 3000 MED (in stock: 3, BO in 1 day from central warehouse) Superfut is the best choice for any football fan! You have a unique chance to play real football as a dynamic board game, becoming a true champion through luck and clever strategy! Everyone gets to show their friend, father, mother, sister, brother, son, daughter or anyone else who the real football champion is! more info: http://www.superfut.com/superfut/en![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.superfut.com%2Fsuperfut%2Fuserfiles%2Fslides%2Fbanner01.png&t=665&c=DMJfKJdbccUiRA) How to buy: - send e-mail to: med@ibipot.com with:
- your full shipping address
product and quantity you want to buy
- we reply:
- amount of MED + order number to pay (eg order is 5000, order number is 0001 then you must pay 5000.0001 MED)
an address where to send MED's if we get transaction, we will ship products via regular air mail within 3 days.
|
— eestimees
|
|
|
loonsert
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 08:30:14 AM |
|
You want to buy 1med = 1 cent?)))) 1 MED = 0.0001 BTC is a good price in a week under the current difficulties will cost much more
|
|
|
|
eestimees
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 08:35:02 AM |
|
just noticed that my USB erupters cgminer window hashrate was very low... taskmanager showed that java is using 1.2Gigs of RAM and using 85% of CPU restarting java with MCProxy3 helped a lot for hashrate to appear normal again
|
— eestimees
|
|
|
cr1st0f
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 12:10:18 PM |
|
just noticed that my USB erupters cgminer window hashrate was very low... taskmanager showed that java is using 1.2Gigs of RAM and using 85% of CPU restarting java with MCProxy3 helped a lot for hashrate to appear normal again
Oh yess... there is a little memory leak on mcproxy. SmallPlatf works on this issue;)
|
|
|
|
ShinerCC
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 02:31:39 PM |
|
I apologize in advance if any of this sounds ignorant, but I'm a bit new at mining.
With the latest bfgminer build (3.9.0) pointed to the ibipot pool, I'm running a single BFL 30GHs w/ an 8 core cpu (win7 64bit). I'm getting an avg of about 12GHs on the BFL and only 4 cores are being used at ~30% at the high end (while crunching). I checked bfgminer.exe's affinity and it's set to all 8 cores. Also, bfgminer is reporting a lot of errors (further decreasing efficiency) at optimal temps (see below):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BFL 0: 56.0C | 13.62/13.97/12.49Gh/s | A:116 R:16+0( 11%) HW:22/.21% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Though the idea behind this coin is fantastic and I'm not giving up on it (yet), it appears that 50% of the hashing power that our lower-end miners have is being wasted.
Is there any way to tweak anything on my end to bring the hash rate up?
Note: I also have a 1.5GH/s Antminer which is displaying all the same issues (hw errors, 50% lower hash rate, barely touches my cpu's potential, and both miner & pool reporting 0.4MH/s = 50% potential). The HW errors do not occur when mining other coins, but does occur whether I'm solo mining or pool mining MED, so I'm wondering if it's the build of the miner...
One last note about the ibipot pool - the reported GH/s rate (on the dashboard) fluctuates dramatically and appears to be almost arbitrary. Their reported hash-rate varies anywhere from 0.8GH/s to 36GH/s while the bfgminer & CPUs on my end stays steady at ~12GH/s & 30% (respectively). Is this a known hash-rate calculation bug at the pool?
Thanks in advance for any help...
|
|
|
|
eestimees
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 02:39:46 PM |
|
I apologize in advance if any of this sounds ignorant, but I'm a bit new at mining.
With the latest bfgminer build (3.9.0) pointed to the ibipot pool, I'm running a single BFL 30GHs w/ an 8 core cpu (win7 64bit). I'm getting an avg of about 12GHs on the BFL and only 4 cores are being used at ~30% at the high end (while crunching). I checked bfgminer.exe's affinity and it's set to all 8 cores. Also, bfgminer is reporting a lot of errors (further decreasing efficiency) at optimal temps (see below):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BFL 0: 56.0C | 13.62/13.97/12.49Gh/s | A:116 R:16+0( 11%) HW:22/.21% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Though the idea behind this coin is fantastic and I'm not giving up on it (yet), it appears that 50% of the hashing power that our lower-end miners have is being wasted.
Is there any way to tweak anything on my end to bring the hash rate up?
Note: I also have a 1.5GH/s Antminer which is displaying all the same issues (hw errors, 50% lower hash rate, barely touches my cpu's potential, and both miner & pool reporting 0.4MH/s = 50% potential). The HW errors do not occur when mining other coins, but does occur whether I'm solo mining or pool mining MED, so I'm wondering if it's the build of the miner...
One last note about the ibipot pool - the reported GH/s rate (on the dashboard) fluctuates dramatically and appears to be almost arbitrary. Their reported hash-rate varies anywhere from 0.8GH/s to 36GH/s while the bfgminer & CPUs on my end stays steady at ~12GH/s & 30% (respectively). Is this a known hash-rate calculation bug at the pool?
Thanks in advance for any help...
I run 3x antminer U1 using Mac and regular (bitcoin) latest bfgminer, that is pointed to latest bfgminer-med modification. It acts as proxy and does the nessesary other calculations eg: on Mac: bfgminer (bitcoin version) -o <proxyip>:1234 -u user.2 -p 123 on win: bfgminer (med version) --http-port 1234 -o ibipot.com:3333 -u user.2 -p 123 hash is normal, hw is low. you could try that or use startum-mining + mcproxy3 + cgminer, that appears to perform a little better, but there is a bottelneck as stratum-mining can only utilize 1 CPU core at the moment. I know there is a new and better solution under development. regarding to pool hashrate, this is calculated on submitting valid shares.. if miner window show one hashrate that includes sharer which are not valid, then pool only calculates valid shares. now the hash on pool is calculated using last 10min valid sharerate, usually sharerate is on average correct, but it will start jumping when miner submits invalid shares. I will look onto it when I have more time for that. At the moment I think it is not that important, as there is some more thing for me to do on pool ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) EDIT: Mac screen: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FuRv6yIE.png&t=665&c=n6eC1zprCGyYrA) Windows bfgminer (med) proxy screen ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fzpd4E4e.png&t=665&c=eT4ifXpqO-pBvA)
|
— eestimees
|
|
|
cr1st0f
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 05:11:21 PM |
|
I apologize in advance if any of this sounds ignorant, but I'm a bit new at mining.
With the latest bfgminer build (3.9.0) pointed to the ibipot pool, I'm running a single BFL 30GHs w/ an 8 core cpu (win7 64bit). I'm getting an avg of about 12GHs on the BFL and only 4 cores are being used at ~30% at the high end (while crunching). I checked bfgminer.exe's affinity and it's set to all 8 cores. Also, bfgminer is reporting a lot of errors (further decreasing efficiency) at optimal temps (see below):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BFL 0: 56.0C | 13.62/13.97/12.49Gh/s | A:116 R:16+0( 11%) HW:22/.21% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Though the idea behind this coin is fantastic and I'm not giving up on it (yet), it appears that 50% of the hashing power that our lower-end miners have is being wasted.
Is there any way to tweak anything on my end to bring the hash rate up?
Note: I also have a 1.5GH/s Antminer which is displaying all the same issues (hw errors, 50% lower hash rate, barely touches my cpu's potential, and both miner & pool reporting 0.4MH/s = 50% potential). The HW errors do not occur when mining other coins, but does occur whether I'm solo mining or pool mining MED, so I'm wondering if it's the build of the miner...
One last note about the ibipot pool - the reported GH/s rate (on the dashboard) fluctuates dramatically and appears to be almost arbitrary. Their reported hash-rate varies anywhere from 0.8GH/s to 36GH/s while the bfgminer & CPUs on my end stays steady at ~12GH/s & 30% (respectively). Is this a known hash-rate calculation bug at the pool?
Thanks in advance for any help...
Bfgminer not work well with multithreading. Use mcproxy3 ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) my bfl 30ghs work at full speed with it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
shpion
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 05:18:41 PM |
|
I would use mcproxy3 but cgminer doesn't recognize my bfl jally. Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
cr1st0f
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 05:53:27 PM |
|
I would use mcproxy3 but cgminer doesn't recognize my bfl jally. Any suggestions?
Use mcproxy3 with bfgminer ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) My Conf.: Bfgminer: mcproxy3 directly to getwork Pool: "C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin\java" -jar mcproxy3.jar -s poolIP -p GETWORKPORT -l 8080 -m 4
mcproxy trought stratum-mining-proxy: "C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin\java" -jar mcproxy3.jar -s 127.0.0.1 -p 3388 -l 8080 -m 4
stratum-mining-proxy conf: -q -o POOLADDRESS -p POOLPORT -oh 127.0.0.1 -gp 3388 -sh 127.0.0.1 -sp 3377 -nm -rt
|
|
|
|
rfe3
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2014, 06:52:10 PM |
|
I would use mcproxy3 but cgminer doesn't recognize my bfl jally. Any suggestions?
Use mcproxy3 with bfgminer ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) My Conf.: Bfgminer: mcproxy3 directly to getwork Pool: "C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin\java" -jar mcproxy3.jar -s poolIP -p GETWORKPORT -l 8080 -m 4
mcproxy trought stratum-mining-proxy: "C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin\java" -jar mcproxy3.jar -s 127.0.0.1 -p 3388 -l 8080 -m 4
stratum-mining-proxy conf: -q -o POOLADDRESS -p POOLPORT -oh 127.0.0.1 -gp 3388 -sh 127.0.0.1 -sp 3377 -nm -rt
If you are using the .jar and Stratum Proxy, do you still start the Wallet in -server mode?
|
|
|
|
|