WompRat
|
|
January 07, 2014, 12:28:55 PM |
|
up to 1,5% cash back but you forgot to mention the annual fee that they charge you. Credit card companies take up to ~4% from the merchant on each transaction, and charge the customer an annual fee. How cool is that?
I had a card once that charged an annual fee, but fees in the UK were largely abandoned due to increased competition.
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
January 07, 2014, 12:29:43 PM |
|
up to 1,5% cash back but you forgot to mention the annual fee that they charge you. Credit card companies take up to ~4% from the merchant on each transaction, and charge the customer an annual fee. How cool is that?
Also to be able to use a CC you need to have money in the bank and all the taxes that are involved in the process. So you pay a CC annual fee plus an account maintenance fee (at least here in Brazil).
But the whole point is, with BTC you don't need to put money in the bank system to begin with. It's not like you buy BTC to use it. You receive BTC and use it and avoid the banking system altogether. But I agree that right now most people would have to buy BTC. This is just because we are in the beginning of the process(transition).
Let me tell you another scenario that happens here in Brazil. If you use your CC to purchase abroad, you are taxed 6%!!! So I'm here in Brazil and want to purchase something on Ebay, whhaammm , 6% tax! I travel abroad and use my CC for my expenses (food, hotel, etc) whhaaam another 6% gone. Not to mention the dollar to brazilian money conversion rate that the bank uses.
When you see the big picture, it's easy to spot the advantages of using BTC.
This ^
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
January 07, 2014, 02:14:50 PM |
|
Because the merchant can offer 5% discount by not having to go through VISA. Or because they just like using bitcoins and don't care about the costs.
I sell stuff online and give a 20% discount for paying with Bitcoin. The reduction in fraud more than makes up for the discount. Bingo - so do I - www.thaidomains.com
|
|
|
|
BitchicksHusband
|
|
January 07, 2014, 06:34:35 PM |
|
I not only don't pay an annual fee but I also get free Disney dollars with every purchase. So why would I rather use bitcoin?
My daughter just got her debit card and went to the movies and it was declined. She was with a friend who paid but she was angry. Who was the bank to tell her she couldn't spend HER money? I told her, "This is why I like bitcoin. Nobody can tell me that I can't spend my money." My wife had to take her back to the credit union to fix it. Apparently, there's an "unwritten rule" that you should just know that an ATM card MUST be used at an ATM once before using it as a MASTERCARD. Would have been nice to know.
Also, the other day I didn't have cash so I texted some money to my bitcoin-buddy co-worker to pay my share. Technically, I only paid 42 cents for lunch. That's a good reason right there. (Yeah, someday it might be worth $400, but by then I won't care.)
|
1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
January 08, 2014, 03:26:31 AM |
|
I not only don't pay an annual fee but I also get free Disney dollars with every purchase. So why would I rather use bitcoin?
My daughter just got her debit card and went to the movies and it was declined. She was with a friend who paid but she was angry. Who was the bank to tell her she couldn't spend HER money? I told her, "This is why I like bitcoin. Nobody can tell me that I can't spend my money." My wife had to take her back to the credit union to fix it. Apparently, there's an "unwritten rule" that you should just know that an ATM card MUST be used at an ATM once before using it as a MASTERCARD. Would have been nice to know.
Also, the other day I didn't have cash so I texted some money to my bitcoin-buddy co-worker to pay my share. Technically, I only paid 42 cents for lunch. That's a good reason right there. (Yeah, someday it might be worth $400, but by then I won't care.)
Didn't know that rule, but you make a good point. Credit cards can get declined for "random reasons". hard to think of a reason for bitcoins to be declined
|
|
|
|
romerun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
|
|
January 08, 2014, 04:01:54 AM |
|
before btc go mainstream merchants should offer a lot of discount to take btc reasons is
merchant will get that discount back as btc grow at least 10x every year until saturation
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
January 08, 2014, 04:04:18 AM |
|
before btc go mainstream merchants should offer a lot of discount to take btc reasons is
merchant will get that discount back as btc grow at least 10x every year until saturation
Lots of merchants offer discounts for bitcoin purchases already, and I'm sure many more will in the future, for exactly the reason you state
|
|
|
|
Mattius459 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
January 08, 2014, 06:53:35 AM Last edit: January 08, 2014, 07:13:04 AM by Mattius459 |
|
No, this is how you bootstrap a currency without concentrating all the wealth in a few hands. From an investing standpoint, which is where I am, it doesn't matter why or how a currency is maintained, all that matters is the bottom line cost. Centralized, decentralized, all things considered, which is the cheaper way to do business? That is my question. To simplify things, lets imagine that we are in 2040 and that there are no more Bitcoins entering the market. Will the market cost of solving these algorithms on the Bitcoin network be less than that of centralized systems doing the same work? I honestly don't know but the next question to ask is this: As transaction volume goes up on the BTC network, is the average transaction cost (after 2040) going to look like a negative exponential curve, will it be linear, or will it be exponential? Would love to hear anyone's response on this one. ** On the other hand when looking at CC's, will fraud become more or less prevalent in the future? I read that fraud prevention accounts for 40% of CC company costs. If fraud declines because cyber security improves over time, or if the general population becomes more educated on identity protection, then this will lower the cost of CC transaction fees. Other things to consider are: Electricity cost in the future, precious metal costs in the future, Moore's law, and open internet to name a few. BTC is more sensitive to these variables than conventional means of transaction processing. P.S. FYI those figures are well-known to be overstated because miners don't use equipment they calculate for. Blockchain should update for the efficiency of ASICs The chart shows BTC payout per volume, I don't see how an increase in efficiency would change anything on this chart. To my understanding it is simply 3600/daily volume. Please explain. ** I have read a bit on how the blockchain works and how solving these algorithms works, but I do not know what determines increase or decrease in complexity of these algorithms, particularly how the difficulty is expected to change over time per transaction
|
|
|
|
FenixRD
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I am Citizenfive.
|
|
January 08, 2014, 02:08:46 PM |
|
|
Uberlurker. Been here since the Finney transaction. Please consider this before replying; there is a good chance I've heard it before.
-Citizenfive
|
|
|
granolageek
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
January 08, 2014, 02:21:32 PM |
|
An online merchant cannot afford to directly take credit cards until he is doing a couple of thousand dollars per month. Until then it's Paypal, which is about a 6% transaction fee, and scarily unreliable.
So a 5% discount for Bitcoin is a win. A few cents more cash, and a lot less pain in the anatomy. For the immediate future, neither conversion cost nor inflation are relevant: There are already a few monthly expenses, hosting was the first, that I can pay in Bitcoin.
Until you have been an extremely small (like, supporting one family, small) retail merchant, you have no idea how horrid credit cards and Paypal are, and thus how much it is worth to avoid them.
|
|
|
|
Kungfucheez
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 08, 2014, 09:38:24 PM |
|
Can BTC really be viewed as a currency though?
It seems like it's more of a commodity these days because the price of 1BTC is so high compared to all the other fiat currency. Plus the price is so volatile compared to more stable fiat currencies, I don't see this benefiting the every-day purchases people make in any way other then speculation.
I mean gold is a commodity, but you'd have a tough time using it to purchase every-day items. Idk
|
|
|
|
FenixRD
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I am Citizenfive.
|
|
January 08, 2014, 10:21:14 PM |
|
Can BTC really be viewed as a currency though?
It seems like it's more of a commodity these days because the price of 1BTC is so high compared to all the other fiat currency. Plus the price is so volatile compared to more stable fiat currencies, I don't see this benefiting the every-day purchases people make in any way other then speculation.
I mean gold is a commodity, but you'd have a tough time using it to purchase every-day items. Idk
It is most of the best aspects of many things -- commodities, currency, stocks. Really it's most like a stock, tbh. The main difference is the issuance. Instead of splits or dividends which go to holders (which, BTW, describes Proof-of-Stake mining exactly), in Bitcoin there is something you'd not find in a stock. Instead of periodic issuance of new shares, leading to a very discrete stairstep, Bitcoin issues shares algorithmically at a mostly fixed rate based on the mining activity, and while it too is technically a stairstep, it is much finer-grained and the steps decrease in height until the year 2140 (Minus the bit where miners get ahead of the block retargeting, so we may be done in 70 - 80% of time if this keeps up. Which is also okay: if we are still on an iteration of the protocol that is that close to what we have now, the protocol will -- I'm betting -- require added precision to the decimals, at which point mining can also continue, and probably should. Notable, no matter how precise the decimals, it will never quite reach fully 21 million.).
|
Uberlurker. Been here since the Finney transaction. Please consider this before replying; there is a good chance I've heard it before.
-Citizenfive
|
|
|
kkaspar
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
banned but not broken
|
|
January 08, 2014, 10:43:25 PM |
|
I think that cryptos won't be an serious alternative as payment, as long as they have to be supported by the dollar to fight against the volatility issues. Right now, the only way to do business with cryptos, is with intermediate support services, that directly converts coins received to dollars, so you can have some stability in your calculations. These intermediate services want to earn profit as well and paying with bitcoin won't be much more effective then paying with a credit card. I hope that maybe in the future, cryptos get big enough, so they start supporting each others value. Only then there can be price stability that removes the necessity of intermediate support services, and then payment can be truly efficient. But to get big enough, cryptos HAVE to develop some market integrity. With the current level of integrity, cryptos won't grow bigger from being an innovative gambling platform.
|
|
|
|
BitchicksHusband
|
|
January 09, 2014, 01:01:24 AM |
|
This is excellent. Thanks.
|
1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
January 09, 2014, 02:32:58 AM |
|
I think that cryptos won't be an serious alternative as payment, as long as they have to be supported by the dollar to fight against the volatility issues. Right now, the only way to do business with cryptos, is with intermediate support services, that directly converts coins received to dollars, so you can have some stability in your calculations. These intermediate services want to earn profit as well and paying with bitcoin won't be much more effective then paying with a credit card. I hope that maybe in the future, cryptos get big enough, so they start supporting each others value. Only then there can be price stability that removes the necessity of intermediate support services, and then payment can be truly efficient. But to get big enough, cryptos HAVE to develop some market integrity. With the current level of integrity, cryptos won't grow bigger from being an innovative gambling platform.
Bitcoin has plenty of advantages (e.g. you don't need a credit card to use it) to make it a great alternative to credit cards right now. Just because many merchants choose to convert to fiat immediately doesn't negate those benefits.
|
|
|
|
BitchicksHusband
|
|
January 10, 2014, 09:07:06 PM |
|
Which means:
• People with bad credit or who are recently bankrupt can buy things online • Underage kids can buy things online (this may or may not be a good thing since many people assume "credit card=18 years old", but it does change things)
|
1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
January 11, 2014, 02:50:55 AM |
|
Which means:
• People with bad credit or who are recently bankrupt can buy things online • Underage kids can buy things online (this may or may not be a good thing since many people assume "credit card=18 years old", but it does change things)
Kids borrow their parents credit cards anyway. But I don't see anything wrong with kids buying stuff online. Anyone who wants to watch porn can watch for free. Nobody pays for that, so that's not an issue. If someone has money (bitcoins), let them buy what they want. Freedom!
|
|
|
|
|