Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2017, 10:24:28 AM *
News: If the forum does not load normally for you, please send me a traceroute.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 [1487] 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign  (Read 2106470 times)
testcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432


View Profile WWW
March 19, 2017, 02:31:13 PM
 #29721

https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte.git can we compile from this or is this still being updated?

Please use https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte-old if you are compiling from source until we announce an official release.

Cheers
or follow this advice clearly stated in README.md and now directly from one of the devs working on the code.  Wink  Thx G.


Nice, we finally have some wallet upgrade for DGB

Where can I find the list of changes for the new upgrade?

Spend GCN at World of electronics Transfer files at www.gfile.us 10k free per transfer Smiley
1493375068
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493375068

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493375068
Reply with quote  #2

1493375068
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1493375068
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493375068

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493375068
Reply with quote  #2

1493375068
Report to moderator
morningman
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18


View Profile
March 19, 2017, 04:44:57 PM
 #29722

Having issue with wallet. Running latest Windows 64 bit wallet. Wallet has been operating fine since download last year. This weekend I tried opening it but I receive a window that reads, "cannot read blocks".
Can someone tell Me how to fix this problem?
ReSl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229



View Profile
March 19, 2017, 04:58:32 PM
 #29723

Yes, please add other nodes and start your client with the -reindex command-line option

Quote
46.4.66.6
134.255.221.7
178.33.228.14
95.47.155.37
176.9.61.40
54.89.21.44
68.63.19.64
108.61.10.90
213.73.136.90
60.205.112.102
104.238.187.114
86.31.44.129
86.31.245.140
185.128.41.158
162.243.59.178
176.31.126.191
104.131.142.198
173.212.199.201
130.240.22.202
93.113.101.229
The new wallet currently being tested will overcome your issues but for now you need patience.
Anyone having trouble with core wallet connecting, you may need to add seed nodes.
1.   Help
2.   Debug window
3.   Console and enter

addnode “[any of the above IPs]” “add”
eg.   addnode “93.113.101.229” “add”
Jumanji7
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


🌟 SONM ICO: 25/05/17 🌟


View Profile
March 19, 2017, 05:13:20 PM
 #29724

Any roadmap for the short term?

lionhead666
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92


View Profile
March 19, 2017, 05:14:14 PM
 #29725

What are the three best things about Digibyte?

Security - real decentralization with Multi-Algo support and Digi-Shield
Speed - very fast transactions
Commited development team
cryptmebro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 761


View Profile
March 20, 2017, 02:30:58 AM
 #29726

What are the three best things about Digibyte?

Security - real decentralization with Multi-Algo support and Digi-Shield
Speed - very fast transactions
Commited development team


cheap as fuck
best potential for ROI of nearly any alt on poloniex.
it works, fast
supports a trillion lot of TPS. more than will be needed for a long time. Furthermore, it's already programmed to increase with time. No scaling issues here.
connexus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 506



View Profile
March 20, 2017, 03:33:48 AM
 #29727

Any roadmap for the short term?

There isn't any at the moment, the current roadmap is strategically plan for long term.




           _____ 
     __¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_
   _¦¦¦¦¦¯       ¯¦¦¦¦¦_
 _¦¦¦¦¯             ¯¦¦¦¦_
 ¦¦¦¯                 ¯¦¦¦_
¦¦¦¯   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦   ¯¦¦¦
¦¦¦    ¯¯¯¯¯¦¦¦¯¯¯¯¯    ¦¦¦
¦¦¦         ¦¦¦         ¦¦¦
¦¦¦_        ¦¦¦        ¦¦¦¦
¯¦¦¦_       ¦¦¦       _¦¦¦¯
 ¯¦¦¦¦_     ¯¯¯     _¦¦¦¦¯
   ¯¦¦¦¦¦__     __¦¦¦¦¦¯
      ¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
           ¯¯¯¯¯¯ 
WeTrust.io¦
¦
¦

             _¦¦_
     _      ¦¦¦¦¦   __
   ¦¦¦¦¦     ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
    ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
 _¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦     ¯¦¦¦¦     
 ¯¯   ¦¦¦¦¦     ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
      ¯¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
    ___¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯    ¦¦¦¦¦
    ¯¯¯  ¦¦¦¦¦     ¯¯¯
         ¯¦¦¦¯
.........SLACK..........
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
BITCOINTALK THREAD


 _¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦    ¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦    _¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ _¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
 ¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
.YOUTUBE.
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
BLOG

                 _¦¦¦¦__    _
¦¦             ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
¦¦¦¦_         ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦__   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
__¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
    ¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
      _¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
__¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯
   ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
.TWITTER.
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
MEDIUM

  _¦¦__                __¦¦_
  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦___________¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¯                  ¯¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦    ¦¦¦_      _¦¦¦    ¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦   ¦¦¦¦¦      ¦¦¦¦¦   ¦¦¦¦
 ¦¦¦    ¯¦¦¯      ¯¦¦¯    ¦¦¦¯
  ¯¦¦_                  _¦¦¯
    ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
.GITHUB.
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
TELEGRAM
¦
¦
¦
Jumbley
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882



View Profile WWW
March 20, 2017, 01:49:36 PM
 #29728

community thoughts on activation of segwit on DigiByte chain and consensus of community. All sensible thinkers welcome to comment.  https://t.me/DigiByteCoin

Jonesd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204



View Profile WWW
March 20, 2017, 04:02:21 PM
 #29729

community thoughts on activation of segwit on DigiByte chain and consensus of community. All sensible thinkers welcome to comment.  https://t.me/DigiByteCoin

Only sensible thinkers? Too bad. Let me know when you also accept unreasonably optimistic people. :-D

Jumbley
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882



View Profile WWW
March 20, 2017, 04:46:23 PM
 #29730

community thoughts on activation of segwit on DigiByte chain and consensus of community. All sensible thinkers welcome to comment.  https://t.me/DigiByteCoin

Only sensible thinkers? Too bad. Let me know when you also accept unreasonably optimistic people. :-D
They are up now.  Smiley

cryptmebro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 761


View Profile
March 20, 2017, 10:24:14 PM
 #29731

community thoughts on activation of segwit on DigiByte chain and consensus of community. All sensible thinkers welcome to comment.  https://t.me/DigiByteCoin

completely unnecessary. DGB does not need a new scaling solution, it already has the best on chain scaling of any coin right now and can handle far more transactions on chain than any other coin, and any other coin + Segwit.
HR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Transparency & Integrity


View Profile
March 20, 2017, 10:32:25 PM
 #29732

community thoughts on activation of segwit on DigiByte chain and consensus of community. All sensible thinkers welcome to comment.  https://t.me/DigiByteCoin

completely unnecessary. DGB does not need a new scaling solution, it already has the best on chain scaling of any coin right now and can handle far more transactions on chain than any other coin + Segwit.

I agree. No need for immediate activation. The fact that it's there for the future, if and when needed, is good enough for now. It's never a good idea to unnecessarily complicate things, and if it's needed for marketing purposes, "Segwit Ready" or "Segwit Capable" or something similar should get the job done, as well as implicitly saying that it isn't necessary at this time. Win-Win. :-)
Jumbley
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882



View Profile WWW
March 20, 2017, 10:45:42 PM
 #29733

community thoughts on activation of segwit on DigiByte chain and consensus of community. All sensible thinkers welcome to comment.  https://t.me/DigiByteCoin

completely unnecessary. DGB does not need a new scaling solution, it already has the best on chain scaling of any coin right now and can handle far more transactions on chain than any other coin + Segwit.

I agree. No need for immediate activation. The fact that it's there for the future, if and when needed, is good enough for now. It's never a good idea to unnecessarily complicate things, and if it's needed for marketing purposes, "Segwit Ready" or "Segwit Capable" or something similar should get the job done, as well as implicitly saying that it isn't necessary at this time. Win-Win. :-)

I'm inclined to agree but I think activation should happen in the region of 65% of miners. Here are some of the reasons stated by Jared on the subject.

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:16]
Segwit has many benefits besides simply increasing scalability

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:16]
it fixes the transaction malleability issue

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:17]
it allows for roughly 4mb worth of transactions in the same space as 1 mb takes now

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:17]
most importantly it allows for a future of on chain "smart" contracts on UTXO based blockchains

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:17]
so from an applications standpoint it opens many doors

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:18]
It actually makes the most sense to combine both approaches, Segwit + increased block sizes

Jonesd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204



View Profile WWW
March 20, 2017, 11:05:51 PM
 #29734

What are the disadvantages of implementing it? Bloating the chain with too big blocks?

cryptmebro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 761


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 12:07:06 AM
 #29735

community thoughts on activation of segwit on DigiByte chain and consensus of community. All sensible thinkers welcome to comment.  https://t.me/DigiByteCoin

completely unnecessary. DGB does not need a new scaling solution, it already has the best on chain scaling of any coin right now and can handle far more transactions on chain than any other coin + Segwit.

I agree. No need for immediate activation. The fact that it's there for the future, if and when needed, is good enough for now. It's never a good idea to unnecessarily complicate things, and if it's needed for marketing purposes, "Segwit Ready" or "Segwit Capable" or something similar should get the job done, as well as implicitly saying that it isn't necessary at this time. Win-Win. :-)

I'm inclined to agree but I think activation should happen in the region of 65% of miners. Here are some of the reasons stated by Jared on the subject.

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:16]
it fixes the transaction malleability issue

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:17]
it allows for roughly 4mb worth of transactions in the same space as 1 mb takes now

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:17]
most importantly it allows for a future of on chain "smart" contracts on UTXO based blockchains

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:17]
so from an applications standpoint it opens many doors

Digi Tater, [20.03.17 14:18]
It actually makes the most sense to combine both approaches, Segwit + increased block sizes

Only for segwit transactions

Best case scenario 4MB, and segwit saves space by removing the signature data to save KB in block space. This technically makes the coins spendable by anyone.

Segwit in itself does not do this. It's the byproduct of a malleability fix.

It finally opened the door for a much need hard fork for Bitcoin, yes. It's so bad people will now FINALLY hard fork the block size for bitcon; something Digibyte has already successfully done.
For litecoin, not so many doors.
It's already falied twice. No need to bring the failure and drama to Digibyte.

Again, Segwit is so overly complex it actually does not make sense.

I understand why jared is pro segwit, it's good for "marketing", but from a technical standpoint, its absolutely terrible.

Please read this with an open mind

http://www.wallstreettechnologist.com/2016/12/03/core-segwit-you-need-to-read-this/
esotericizm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750



View Profile
March 21, 2017, 12:38:59 AM
 #29736


I understand why jared is pro segwit, it's good for "marketing", but from a technical standpoint, its absolutely terrible.

Not going to disagree with anything else that's been said but the dev team is not 'pro segwit'.

We have a more than adequate fix for tx scaling via our increased speed and block sizes. I'm Far more interested in keeping our bloat down and in on-chain smart contracts.
cryptmebro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 761


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 02:14:52 AM
 #29737


I understand why jared is pro segwit, it's good for "marketing", but from a technical standpoint, its absolutely terrible.

Not going to disagree with anything else that's been said but the dev team is not 'pro segwit'.


Was not my intent to imply that about the whole team.
HR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Transparency & Integrity


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 09:07:07 AM
 #29738


What's the old saying? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Is that it?

I think that applies in DigiBytes case. Necessary updates, and the rest left as "future ready". Be a respected leader, not a mindless follower.

As for BTC, well, they're in another situation entirely, and it looks like they're not making good decisions either. Here's a nice run-down that I think is very hard to argue against using sound logic and fundamental facts. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-19/bitcoins-fork-road

Let others make the mistakes while we keep the safe and steady high road.

desynct
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 10:33:23 AM
 #29739


What's the old saying? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Is that it?


+100, Toyota way - look at others, analyze their success/problems, only then apply if needed.
there's no hurry with segwit at all.

but i really need 6.13.0, chain's pretty long, block check at startup takes too long, almost intolerable now.
Jumbley
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882



View Profile WWW
March 21, 2017, 10:54:51 AM
 #29740


What's the old saying? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Is that it?

I think that applies in DigiBytes case. Necessary updates, and the rest left as "future ready". Be a respected leader, not a mindless follower.

As for BTC, well, they're in another situation entirely, and it looks like they're not making good decisions either. Here's a nice run-down that I think is very hard to argue against using sound logic and fundamental facts. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-19/bitcoins-fork-road

Let others make the mistakes while we keep the safe and steady high road.



Now I understand your concern here but nobody is talking about breaking anything. This is about preparing DigiByte so that it can realise its full potential and compete or indeed outperform, at least with capability if not price, all others crypto’s including precious bitcoin.
It’s interesting that the article you have presented is an argument for bitcoin supporters to support Segwit and not a fork with increased block sizes. The argument is totally based in protectionism of price of bitcoin and I’m not saying it shouldn’t be of any concern but it is flawed. Any coin that is not bitcoin is an ‘alt coin’ and this article suggests that if it is an ’alt coin’, it is shit and that I think, just doesn’t make any real sense.
Because DigiByte is only traded through bitcoin and because how traders tend to operate, DigiByte maintains a relationship closer to fiat, so at this time, this means that whatever changes DigiByte dev team do make, anything other than total catastrophic failure of the blockchain is unlikely to lead to price being pushed far below this threshold before returning to at least this relationship with fiat again. To summarise, our risk is infinitesimally small compared to many other crypto’s and especially bitcoin.
That said, I agree this should not be approached without caution and planning. There is no great urgency to rush into this and a smooth transition will deliver the best outcome for all DigiByte supporters.

Pages: « 1 ... 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 [1487] 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!