AlexGR
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
 |
May 03, 2014, 10:53:40 PM |
|
GPU miners remember to check experimental intensity in sph-sgminer. I've used experimental intensity at 400 & 800 with slight increase in hashpower and less rejects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
drkman
|
|
May 03, 2014, 11:08:03 PM |
|
So which one is best to use?
PHM-sgminer or SPH-miner?
|
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 03, 2014, 11:10:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DieCommieScum
|
|
May 03, 2014, 11:13:30 PM |
|
Shirt order update:   I have 3 spare shirts left on hand, two XL's and one XXL Had a nightmare shipping international with the big order, so these are open to US only (sorry). $23usd in either dark or btc. Still looking to sell these. one of the XL's gone... still one remaining as well as a 2XL |
|
|
|
|
|
drkman
|
|
May 03, 2014, 11:29:18 PM |
|
Any benefit from using the latest SPH-sgminer vs a slightly older one that supports less of the X11 coins? It looks like the latest version may only add support for the newest X11 coins. Is that correct or is the latest version faster than a version 2 or 3 back?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simcom
|
|
May 03, 2014, 11:39:31 PM |
|
Any benefit from using the latest SPH-sgminer vs a slightly older one that supports less of the X11 coins? It looks like the latest version may only add support for the newest X11 coins. Is that correct or is the latest version faster than a version 2 or 3 back?
I don't think it makes a difference but I could be wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
jakecrow
|
|
May 03, 2014, 11:42:19 PM |
|
Any benefit from using the latest SPH-sgminer vs a slightly older one that supports less of the X11 coins? It looks like the latest version may only add support for the newest X11 coins. Is that correct or is the latest version faster than a version 2 or 3 back?
Depends on how old the one you're using is. At -some- point the miner was optimized a bit and took my 280x cards from 2.1 to 2.3, but I don't know exactly where that was. If you're already hitting 2.3 then you don't need to worry about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
eltito
|
|
May 03, 2014, 11:47:12 PM |
|
Password protecting the goddamn wallet on startup would alleviate the sender-record problem at least.
I never understood why this is not standard. I've been going on about this since page 600 and you're the only person who's noticed.  I'm not even sure what this means to be honest. Are you saying you shouldn't need to manually encrypt wallet and add password, it should prompt for a new password as soon as the wallet launches for the first time? Not the first time, because you haven't set a password yet, but if you've encrypted your wallet, it should ask you for a password subsequently, before opening up and allowing everyone and anyone to see full records of your transactions. Or copying your .dat and viewing everything you've done later. You expect to have to enter a password to see your banking online, right? And your email, and your exchange accounts, and just about everything else, for good reason. For an "anonymous" coin, it's a baffling omission. Hmm, yes that is a good point. I agree a password should be required to see history of transactions. The problem I see is that the more times you input your password the more chances a malicious key-logger has to get your coins. :/ It guess it is a tradeoff. I wonder if it could be built in to the transaction log tab specifically? Regardless, I would only support the idea if it were a separate pw from the actual wallet pw for just the reason you mention (key loggers). |
|
|
|
|
Donho
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
May 03, 2014, 11:54:00 PM |
|
Password protecting the goddamn wallet on startup would alleviate the sender-record problem at least.
I never understood why this is not standard. I've been going on about this since page 600 and you're the only person who's noticed. I'm not even sure what this means to be honest. Are you saying you shouldn't need to manually encrypt wallet and add password, it should prompt for a new password as soon as the wallet launches for the first time? Not the first time, because you haven't set a password yet, but if you've encrypted your wallet, it should ask you for a password subsequently, before opening up and allowing everyone and anyone to see full records of your transactions. Or copying your .dat and viewing everything you've done later. You expect to have to enter a password to see your banking online, right? And your email, and your exchange accounts, and just about everything else, for good reason. For an "anonymous" coin, it's a baffling omission. Hmm, yes that is a good point. I agree a password should be required to see history of transactions. The problem I see is that the more times you input your password the more chances a malicious key-logger has to get your coins. :/ It guess it is a tradeoff. I wonder if it could be built in to the transaction log tab specifically? Regardless, I would only support the idea if it were a separate pw from the actual wallet pw for just the reason you mention (key loggers). Like blockchain.info where you can set 2 passwords. One to see your wallets balancee and addresses and stuff and a second one thats necessary for sending coins, generating new addresses etc |
|
|
|
|
|
TingCoin
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:04:11 AM |
|
Localbitcoin down for anyone else?
Got 2.5 BTC in there waiting to be spent on DRK!
LocalBitcoins received a very dangerous attack against the site infrastructure on Saturday 3.5.2014.
For now
All user data and Bitcoins are safe;
The site will be down for a while as the system is being rebuilt
Details
LocalBitcoins hosting provided received a request to restart the LocalBitcoins.com website server and give access to the server console (root) on Sat May 3 13:32:27. LocalBitcoins team did not initiate this request. For now, it looks like the request was made using spoofed email addresses and other weakness in the hosting provider support system.
LocalBitcoins team was alerted about the abnormal activity when the hosting provider restarted the server.
The attacker gained a root access to the server for ~40 minutes before the attacker was kicked out and the server shutdown.
All data on the website server is encrypted. Manual actions are needed to make this data readable, so the attacker could not gain access to the data even when having a server console access.
It is very unlikely that the attacker gained access to any data; LocalBitcoins is still performing full investigation on the matter.
Bitcoins in hot wallet and cold wallet are safe, as LocalBitcoins runs its bitcoind and wallets on a separate server.
LocalBitcoins team has started to rebuild the website server on fresh hardware.
LocalBitcoins team will make further announcements when the investigation proceeds and the site becomes available again. We expect to spend at least 24 hours on this. LocalBitcoins team apologizes the issues the downtime may cause to the users.
Fuck me trust my luck, my biggest DRK purchase and the site goes down before I withdraw. Anyone know who I can contact about getting my coins out before it's up? Hope the site's ok it's by far the best exchange imo. Probably going to be crawling round IRC later finding who I need to speak to  . Want to make the buy before Monday's Wired article ofc. |
Any posts from me that were posted in Russian were NOT from me. A cykablyat obtained my forum login details when they were leaked, I was inactive from the forum at that time.
|
|
|
|
Simcom
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:15:38 AM |
|
So I have a bit of a confession to make. Maybe you guys already knew this but... Today I figured out that you cannot darksend 101 coins unless you have 1000 coins in your wallet. Just to clarify: when you send 101 coins from address A to address B, you submit 1000 coins into the 1000 coin pool, address B recieves 101 and you receive 899 back at a change address C. Same goes if you want to darkssend 10.1 coins, you need 100 coins in your wallet. If you want to darksend 1.1 coins you need to have 10 coins in your wallet. So back to my confession - when I discovered this issue I panicked a bit and sold 7,000 coins and tanked the market  . Now for the good news, if anyone can come up with an ingenious solution to this problem I'll buy back all of these coins in an instant. Put your thinking caps on  |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:23:11 AM |
|
So I have a bit of a confession to make. Maybe you guys already knew this but... Today I figured out that you cannot darksend 101 coins unless you have 1000 coins in your wallet. Just to clarify: when you send 101 coins from address A to address B, you submit 1000 coins into the 1000 coin pool, address B recieves 101 and you receive 899 back at a change address C. Same goes if you want to darkssend 10.1 coins, you need 100 coins in your wallet. If you want to darksend 1.1 coins you need to have 10 coins in your wallet. So back to my confession - when I discovered this issue I panicked a bit and sold 7,000 coins and tanked the market . If anyone can come up with an ingenious solution to this problem I'll buy back all of these coins in an instant. Put your thinking caps on pool : 10, 100, 1000 darkssend 10.1 coins --> 10 + 0.1 --> need 10 + 10 coins, not 100 darkssend 101 coins --> 100 + 1 ---> need 100 + 10 coins, not 1000 Need more smallest pool's size. Isn't it ? If there is 1 coin pool, just need 1 coin more. http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkcoinWhitepaper.pdfImproved Anonymity
An anonymity enhancement to the generic CoinJoin implementation is added by only allowing
inputs of the same size into the DarkSend pools. These sizes are referred to as “denominations”
and are in powers of ten (for example, 1DRK, 10DRK, 100DRK, 1000DRK). This allows the
inputs from all users to be virtually the same. Outputs per user must add up to the denomination
size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jakecrow
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:30:13 AM |
|
So I have a bit of a confession to make. Maybe you guys already knew this but... Today I figured out that you cannot darksend 101 coins unless you have 1000 coins in your wallet. Just to clarify: when you send 101 coins from address A to address B, you submit 1000 coins into the 1000 coin pool, address B recieves 101 and you receive 899 back at a change address C. Same goes if you want to darkssend 10.1 coins, you need 100 coins in your wallet. If you want to darksend 1.1 coins you need to have 10 coins in your wallet. So back to my confession - when I discovered this issue I panicked a bit and sold 7,000 coins and tanked the market . Now for the good news, if anyone can come up with an ingenious solution to this problem I'll buy back all of these coins in an instant. Put your thinking caps on Why in the world would that make you sell $8500 in coins? We're not even at RC2 yet. /confused |
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:32:26 AM |
|
So I have a bit of a confession to make. Maybe you guys already knew this but... Today I figured out that you cannot darksend 101 coins unless you have 1000 coins in your wallet. Just to clarify: when you send 101 coins from address A to address B, you submit 1000 coins into the 1000 coin pool, address B recieves 101 and you receive 899 back at a change address C. Same goes if you want to darkssend 10.1 coins, you need 100 coins in your wallet. If you want to darksend 1.1 coins you need to have 10 coins in your wallet. So back to my confession - when I discovered this issue I panicked a bit and sold 7,000 coins and tanked the market . Now for the good news, if anyone can come up with an ingenious solution to this problem I'll buy back all of these coins in an instant. Put your thinking caps on Why in the world would that make you sell $8500 in coins? We're not even at RC2 yet. /confused If anyone else wants to panic sell, please PM me. Fiat purchases. |
|
|
|
|
|
sharkbyte093
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:33:13 AM |
|
So I have a bit of a confession to make. Maybe you guys already knew this but... Today I figured out that you cannot darksend 101 coins unless you have 1000 coins in your wallet. Just to clarify: when you send 101 coins from address A to address B, you submit 1000 coins into the 1000 coin pool, address B recieves 101 and you receive 899 back at a change address C. Same goes if you want to darkssend 10.1 coins, you need 100 coins in your wallet. If you want to darksend 1.1 coins you need to have 10 coins in your wallet. So back to my confession - when I discovered this issue I panicked a bit and sold 7,000 coins and tanked the market . If anyone can come up with an ingenious solution to this problem I'll buy back all of these coins in an instant. Put your thinking caps on pool : 10, 100, 1000 darkssend 10.1 coins --> 10 + 0.1 --> need 10 + 10 coins, not 100 darkssend 101 coins --> 100 + 1 ---> need 100 + 10 coins , not 1000 Need more smallest pool's size. Isn't it ? If there is 1 coin pool, just need 1 coin more. http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkcoinWhitepaper.pdfImproved Anonymity
An anonymity enhancement to the generic CoinJoin implementation is added by only allowing
inputs of the same size into the DarkSend pools. These sizes are referred to as “denominations”
and are in powers of ten (for example, 1DRK, 10DRK, 100DRK, 1000DRK). This allows the
inputs from all users to be virtually the same. Outputs per user must add up to the denomination
size.
This is correct. It appears he panic sold for no reason if that was his reason for selling. |
|
|
|
|
Kai Proctor
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:38:30 AM |
|
So I have a bit of a confession to make. Maybe you guys already knew this but... Today I figured out that you cannot darksend 101 coins unless you have 1000 coins in your wallet. Just to clarify: when you send 101 coins from address A to address B, you submit 1000 coins into the 1000 coin pool, address B recieves 101 and you receive 899 back at a change address C. Same goes if you want to darkssend 10.1 coins, you need 100 coins in your wallet. If you want to darksend 1.1 coins you need to have 10 coins in your wallet. So back to my confession - when I discovered this issue I panicked a bit and sold 7,000 coins and tanked the market . Now for the good news, if anyone can come up with an ingenious solution to this problem I'll buy back all of these coins in an instant. Put your thinking caps on Wow you sold 7k DRK for that  lol !! That's some panic  |
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:41:14 AM |
|
 According to the price predications for the end of May, this person that has accumulated 202k DRK over the past week or so, will be worth around $2m. God knows if this is an exchange, someone stocking up, someone getting some money to buy something in particular, just moving coins around.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=579976.msg6335710#msg63357107k DRK will be worth around $60k  |
|
|
|
|
|
drkman
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:48:05 AM |
|
If anyone else wants to panic sell, please PM me. Fiat purchases.
PM me too! |
|
|
|
|
|
Kai Proctor
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:48:50 AM |
|
If anyone else wants to panic sell, please PM me. Fiat purchases.
PM me too! me too ! I hope that there are not many like him with that much coins, the slightest gust of wind and they tank the market for nothing. |
|
|
|
|
|
