Seriously, you have to make your first post WAY more clear.
You wrote NEX everywhere, is the confusion between NIC & NEC voluntary
So NEX=NIC are going to be given freely on the other post.
1'000'000 NXT distribute 5% of the initial distribution... of the NEC (what we invest on here).
Then again:
- why 5%? how are the other 95% distributed? do you plan to have a billion NEC?
- and how can you cap the maximum number of NEC? as more can be created by burning NIC
it's messy as hell, almost illogical/incoherent (maybe that's the reason..)
We still have to work out the exact numbers to get the economic balance correct. Anyway, we can implement it first and plug in the numbers before we release. We'll need to do some simulations.
So you register IPO funding promise but doesn't have any fixed number? Are you kidding me?
plus there is no mention on how many NEX=NIC will be given on the other post.
Totally unprofessional....
Also it seem you are avoiding a main question:
Why not burning the million NXT in order to distribute fairly the NEX_LVL2=NEC?
Why choosing NXT when it's bad distribution is very well known... could have chose LTC or BTC
"LIMITED invest time" and nothing is ready...
Scream scam-is-the-look-I-wish-to-have
Obviously no software to test.