All rating platforms are shit!?

[pokerjet]

We can not rate all rating platforms as shit but some i read that they raise the grade with invalid votes, the goal may be to mislead the investor. When participating in an ICO, it would be a huge mistake for the investor only to base itself on the ICO rating.

[1713583564]

1713583564

[Fenixsfeather]

We need DAICO or another platform where inventors must register their docs or something for help searching them. This protection against scammers will make investors lives easier.

[salinaangel]

Sorry I cant agree with you that all ratting platforms are shit. Some of them might be bad but not all of them.For your doubtness I recommend you to analyze all the project by yourself

[makishart]

Sorry I cant agree with you that all ratting platforms are shit. Some of them might be bad but not all of them.For your doubtness I recommend you to analyze all the project by yourself

The majority of them are shit and i will never repeat it again, i agree with OP basically the majority of them are getting paid by manipulating the rate of ico itself. More than 90% of ico site.
To do any research has become the investor's responsibility but it looks so shady to see even there is an ico rating site that listed scam ico.

[singpolyma]

I know that many such platforms really uncompromisingly evaluate campaigns and ICO and this big problem for crypt because it is very difficult to trust something..because of scam and fake. I hope we will find some ways to cope with it.

[ccsang]

I don't trust all the rating platform because I believed that "experts" just paid for rating, I saw that high rating project also don't have people invest, but low rating project raised more than 10M $$$, they also don't do any action after report to them about scam ICO project, so I just trust my eyes and do my own research to find out potential ICO project

[restumaulana]

hahaha i hate to say it but i agree with it. most ico rating is fake and not independent, i prefer to learn it by myself

[dicaprio]

Rating agencies today are really very often wrong, and from this it can be concluded that they do not exactly make the correct forecast, because now there are already many projects, about which they wrote and appropriated good grades, as a result, they turned out to be a scam.

[cryptomite]

I've heard about one particular project when the wife was an expert on the rating site and the husband was a leader of project and they would rate it.

[Nidhi Bhatia]

I do not think so, all rating platforms are shit. Some are doing a great job and giving appropriate information. On the other hand some platforms provide a false or fake information related to campaigns and ICO and this is a big problem for crypto because it is very difficult to trust something who is fake or who is real.

[Gontxi]

Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?

of course the scammer makes the crypto industry become negative. and it is very difficult to detect any cheats that are in the name of an ico. as for ico is successful but very no good chance and grow. even tend to walk on the spot, there are many altcoin that fall more than 90% of ico price. this is very regrettable, and make ico reputation even more negative

[iram1011]

Although there are lot of review sites that are coming up, but except icobench, I don't think any other is reliable enough.
The funny part is that the same ICO is given a rating of 3 on one platform and 4.4-4.7 on the other review platform. Any investor who goes by the rating of a scam ico on a scam review website is in for a lot of trouble since he would be losing his hard earned money to some scam ICO.
I don't trust any other website except icobench and I feel others shouldn't trust too.

[bealoveall]

I also think there is dishonesty here. Many expert votes are being purchased for the purpose of enhancing the virtual value of an ICO project. 

[kicauklaten]

the rating which provides platform does not guarantee the success of the ICO. better analyze yourself and are confident with the choice of owning on trust in rating. they value are also not entirely true because many have the good rating but did not succeed in earning. It's a lot going on and of course rating, I think to begin to have no function.

[dollarneed]

Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?

This is what I was thinking, I don't think they are trusted and reliable. It's not a secret anymore that they can manipulate or list a bad ICO into their site. The solution is "do your own research" The first step is to check the team and their advisors, are they real or not, then keep in touch with them. Next, check if the project has a competitor or not, or is there something similar to the project? and the last analyze future prospects of a project.

[kangkilokang]

Sorry I cant agree with you that all ratting platforms are shit. Some of them might be bad but not all of them.For your doubtness I recommend you to analyze all the project by yourself

in fact they are either independently, but the facts prove their analysis also can not speak much when many projects become unsuccessful and even scam. They are no different from the advertising sites and are not very accurate in assessing the project. they do not seem to be a professional platform and just pursue traffic only. I'm not a critic to go back to personal analysis, but there is great hope for them to become more reliable in the future and keep improving common mistakes.

[bontkoli01]

I think that rating platforms are doing very good jobs as they are providing comment about ICO with their related paper like whitepaper and their expectation in a project. They are commenting based on the paper of the coin so they should not be blamed for any discrepancies by the coin. Moreover there are both good and fake platforms. We should be aware of that.

[askmecrypto]

Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?

I agree to it, all rating websites and others are more like paid media these days. You cannot trust any of those as they are getting paid to write a project profiting posts.
Personally, investors should mature more and start doing research, read whitepaper, check out the Team and advisor. etc.

[longergou]

I think the rating platform can only be used as one of the reference projects. We can't blindly invest in a project by relying solely on rating. We need to analyze from more aspects!

[Soccernet344]

In my opinion, one shouldn't trust rating websites as criteria to pick icos. You need to do your in depth research to be able to decipher what is good and what is not good though their are no guarantees. I personally like icodrops as they are very professional and gives accurate results up to the tune of 90%.